Cultural effects on computational metrics of spatial and temporal context

Abstract The concept of “prediction error” - the difference between what occurred and was expected - is key to understanding the cognitive processes of human decision making. Expectations have to be learned so the concept of prediction error critically depends on context, specifically the temporal c...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicholas D. Wright, Jan Grohn, Chen Song, Geraint Rees, Rebecca P. Lawson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2f8a529d29cb4111ba6a5b7b1c67bdcc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2f8a529d29cb4111ba6a5b7b1c67bdcc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2f8a529d29cb4111ba6a5b7b1c67bdcc2021-12-02T15:08:05ZCultural effects on computational metrics of spatial and temporal context10.1038/s41598-018-20200-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/2f8a529d29cb4111ba6a5b7b1c67bdcc2018-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20200-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The concept of “prediction error” - the difference between what occurred and was expected - is key to understanding the cognitive processes of human decision making. Expectations have to be learned so the concept of prediction error critically depends on context, specifically the temporal context of probabilistically related events and their changes across time (i.e. volatility). While past research suggests context differently affects some cognitive processes in East Asian and Western individuals, it is currently unknown whether this extends to computationally-grounded measures of learning and prediction error. Here we compared Chinese and British nationals in an associative learning task that quantifies behavioural effects of prediction error, and—through a hierarchical Bayesian learning model—also captures how individuals learn about probabilistic relationships and their volatility. For comparison, we also administered a psychophysical task, the tilt illusion, to assess cultural differences in susceptibility to spatial context. We found no cultural differences in the effect of spatial context on perception. In the domain of temporal context there was no effect of culture on sensitivity to prediction error, or learning about volatility, but some suggestion that Chinese individuals may learn more readily about probabilistic relationships.Nicholas D. WrightJan GrohnChen SongGeraint ReesRebecca P. LawsonNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Nicholas D. Wright
Jan Grohn
Chen Song
Geraint Rees
Rebecca P. Lawson
Cultural effects on computational metrics of spatial and temporal context
description Abstract The concept of “prediction error” - the difference between what occurred and was expected - is key to understanding the cognitive processes of human decision making. Expectations have to be learned so the concept of prediction error critically depends on context, specifically the temporal context of probabilistically related events and their changes across time (i.e. volatility). While past research suggests context differently affects some cognitive processes in East Asian and Western individuals, it is currently unknown whether this extends to computationally-grounded measures of learning and prediction error. Here we compared Chinese and British nationals in an associative learning task that quantifies behavioural effects of prediction error, and—through a hierarchical Bayesian learning model—also captures how individuals learn about probabilistic relationships and their volatility. For comparison, we also administered a psychophysical task, the tilt illusion, to assess cultural differences in susceptibility to spatial context. We found no cultural differences in the effect of spatial context on perception. In the domain of temporal context there was no effect of culture on sensitivity to prediction error, or learning about volatility, but some suggestion that Chinese individuals may learn more readily about probabilistic relationships.
format article
author Nicholas D. Wright
Jan Grohn
Chen Song
Geraint Rees
Rebecca P. Lawson
author_facet Nicholas D. Wright
Jan Grohn
Chen Song
Geraint Rees
Rebecca P. Lawson
author_sort Nicholas D. Wright
title Cultural effects on computational metrics of spatial and temporal context
title_short Cultural effects on computational metrics of spatial and temporal context
title_full Cultural effects on computational metrics of spatial and temporal context
title_fullStr Cultural effects on computational metrics of spatial and temporal context
title_full_unstemmed Cultural effects on computational metrics of spatial and temporal context
title_sort cultural effects on computational metrics of spatial and temporal context
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/2f8a529d29cb4111ba6a5b7b1c67bdcc
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasdwright culturaleffectsoncomputationalmetricsofspatialandtemporalcontext
AT jangrohn culturaleffectsoncomputationalmetricsofspatialandtemporalcontext
AT chensong culturaleffectsoncomputationalmetricsofspatialandtemporalcontext
AT geraintrees culturaleffectsoncomputationalmetricsofspatialandtemporalcontext
AT rebeccaplawson culturaleffectsoncomputationalmetricsofspatialandtemporalcontext
_version_ 1718388241632067584