Improved Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer with an Electronic Nose: A Large Pilot Study

Background: Bladder cancer (BCa) emits specific volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the urine headspace that can be detected by an electronic nose. The diagnostic performance of an electronic nose in detecting BCa was investigated in a pilot study. Methods: A prospective, single-center, controlled,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: PierFrancesco Bassi, Luca Di Gianfrancesco, Luigi Salmaso, Mauro Ragonese, Giuseppe Palermo, Emilio Sacco, Rosa Arboretti Giancristofaro, Riccardo Ceccato, Marco Racioppi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2f8d97be770a49f19f1126877679d023
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2f8d97be770a49f19f1126877679d023
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2f8d97be770a49f19f1126877679d0232021-11-11T17:36:51ZImproved Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer with an Electronic Nose: A Large Pilot Study10.3390/jcm102149842077-0383https://doaj.org/article/2f8d97be770a49f19f1126877679d0232021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/21/4984https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383Background: Bladder cancer (BCa) emits specific volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the urine headspace that can be detected by an electronic nose. The diagnostic performance of an electronic nose in detecting BCa was investigated in a pilot study. Methods: A prospective, single-center, controlled, non-randomized, phase 2 study was carried out on 198 consecutive subjects (102 with proven BCa, 96 controls). Urine samples were evaluated with an electronic nose provided with 32 volatile gas analyzer sensors. The tests were repeated at least two times per sample. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and variability were evaluated using mainly the non-parametric combination method, permutation tests, and discriminant analysis classification. Results: Statistically significant differences between BCa patients and controls were reported by 28 (87.5%) of the 32 sensors. The overall discriminatory power, sensitivity, and specificity were 78.8%, 74.1%, and 76%, respectively; 13/96 (13.5%) controls and 29/102 (28.4%) BCa patients were misclassified as false positive and false negative, respectively. Where the most efficient sensors were selected, the sensitivity and specificity increased up to 91.1% (72.5–100) and 89.1% (81–95.8), respectively. None of the tumor characteristics represented independent predictors of device responsiveness. Conclusions: The electronic nose might represent a potentially reliable, quick, accurate, and cost-effective tool for non-invasive BCa diagnosis.PierFrancesco BassiLuca Di GianfrancescoLuigi SalmasoMauro RagoneseGiuseppe PalermoEmilio SaccoRosa Arboretti GiancristofaroRiccardo CeccatoMarco RacioppiMDPI AGarticleelectronic nosenon-invasive diagnosisvolatile organic compoundsbladder cancerMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 4984, p 4984 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic electronic nose
non-invasive diagnosis
volatile organic compounds
bladder cancer
Medicine
R
spellingShingle electronic nose
non-invasive diagnosis
volatile organic compounds
bladder cancer
Medicine
R
PierFrancesco Bassi
Luca Di Gianfrancesco
Luigi Salmaso
Mauro Ragonese
Giuseppe Palermo
Emilio Sacco
Rosa Arboretti Giancristofaro
Riccardo Ceccato
Marco Racioppi
Improved Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer with an Electronic Nose: A Large Pilot Study
description Background: Bladder cancer (BCa) emits specific volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the urine headspace that can be detected by an electronic nose. The diagnostic performance of an electronic nose in detecting BCa was investigated in a pilot study. Methods: A prospective, single-center, controlled, non-randomized, phase 2 study was carried out on 198 consecutive subjects (102 with proven BCa, 96 controls). Urine samples were evaluated with an electronic nose provided with 32 volatile gas analyzer sensors. The tests were repeated at least two times per sample. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and variability were evaluated using mainly the non-parametric combination method, permutation tests, and discriminant analysis classification. Results: Statistically significant differences between BCa patients and controls were reported by 28 (87.5%) of the 32 sensors. The overall discriminatory power, sensitivity, and specificity were 78.8%, 74.1%, and 76%, respectively; 13/96 (13.5%) controls and 29/102 (28.4%) BCa patients were misclassified as false positive and false negative, respectively. Where the most efficient sensors were selected, the sensitivity and specificity increased up to 91.1% (72.5–100) and 89.1% (81–95.8), respectively. None of the tumor characteristics represented independent predictors of device responsiveness. Conclusions: The electronic nose might represent a potentially reliable, quick, accurate, and cost-effective tool for non-invasive BCa diagnosis.
format article
author PierFrancesco Bassi
Luca Di Gianfrancesco
Luigi Salmaso
Mauro Ragonese
Giuseppe Palermo
Emilio Sacco
Rosa Arboretti Giancristofaro
Riccardo Ceccato
Marco Racioppi
author_facet PierFrancesco Bassi
Luca Di Gianfrancesco
Luigi Salmaso
Mauro Ragonese
Giuseppe Palermo
Emilio Sacco
Rosa Arboretti Giancristofaro
Riccardo Ceccato
Marco Racioppi
author_sort PierFrancesco Bassi
title Improved Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer with an Electronic Nose: A Large Pilot Study
title_short Improved Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer with an Electronic Nose: A Large Pilot Study
title_full Improved Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer with an Electronic Nose: A Large Pilot Study
title_fullStr Improved Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer with an Electronic Nose: A Large Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Improved Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer with an Electronic Nose: A Large Pilot Study
title_sort improved non-invasive diagnosis of bladder cancer with an electronic nose: a large pilot study
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2f8d97be770a49f19f1126877679d023
work_keys_str_mv AT pierfrancescobassi improvednoninvasivediagnosisofbladdercancerwithanelectronicnosealargepilotstudy
AT lucadigianfrancesco improvednoninvasivediagnosisofbladdercancerwithanelectronicnosealargepilotstudy
AT luigisalmaso improvednoninvasivediagnosisofbladdercancerwithanelectronicnosealargepilotstudy
AT mauroragonese improvednoninvasivediagnosisofbladdercancerwithanelectronicnosealargepilotstudy
AT giuseppepalermo improvednoninvasivediagnosisofbladdercancerwithanelectronicnosealargepilotstudy
AT emiliosacco improvednoninvasivediagnosisofbladdercancerwithanelectronicnosealargepilotstudy
AT rosaarborettigiancristofaro improvednoninvasivediagnosisofbladdercancerwithanelectronicnosealargepilotstudy
AT riccardoceccato improvednoninvasivediagnosisofbladdercancerwithanelectronicnosealargepilotstudy
AT marcoracioppi improvednoninvasivediagnosisofbladdercancerwithanelectronicnosealargepilotstudy
_version_ 1718432053549072384