Dynamic aspect in territory sustainable development management: The case of the Volga macroregion

The paper assesses sustainable development dynamic aspects in territorial management. The relevance of the work is determined by the importance of territorial management based on the principles of sustainable development and the need to scrutinize the socio-environmental and economic potential of th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lilia A. Valitova, Marina Yu. Sheresheva
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Ural State University of Economics 2020
Materias:	sustainable development sustainability management regional development dynamic aspect integral indicator system of indicators volga regions Business HF5001-6182 Finance HG1-9999
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2fccc2a92e0e494884fa7fcd4d20f3b3
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2fccc2a92e0e494884fa7fcd4d20f3b3
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2fccc2a92e0e494884fa7fcd4d20f3b32021-12-02T08:40:19ZDynamic aspect in territory sustainable development management: The case of the Volga macroregion10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-3-22218-5003https://doaj.org/article/2fccc2a92e0e494884fa7fcd4d20f3b32020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2020/650https://doaj.org/toc/2218-5003The paper assesses sustainable development dynamic aspects in territorial management. The relevance of the work is determined by the importance of territorial management based on the principles of sustainable development and the need to scrutinize the socio-environmental and economic potential of the territories in order to create conditions for the full use of available resources without compromising the quality of life of current and future generations. Methodologically, the study rests on the concept of sustainable development, resource theory of economic systems, the dynamic approach to management, and the methodology for constructing integrated indicators and systems of indicators. In the article, the methods of analysis, synthesis, systematization, statistical observation, etc. are applied. Having shown the advantages and disadvantages of integral indicators found in Russian and foreign studies, the authors focus on selecting official statistics data that adequately reflect the state of the economy, population health and welfare, as well as natural capital. An increase in the level of welfare and population social development, while maintaining environmental sustainability, is regarded as the criterion of sustainability. Addressing the case of the Volga macroregion, we characterize the current state of regional development and scrutinize the dynamic aspect, namely the long-term development trajectory of each of the 17 regions. The research analyzes the growth rates of sustainable development indicators for the period of 2010–2017. The study reveals significant differences in the dynamics across the regions. The Republic of Tatarstan and Nizhny Novgorod oblast demonstrate a positive trend in all the components at initially high values, while the Republic of Kalmykia shows the worst dynamics at low values. The authors conclude that the system of indicators is preferable to the integral indicator and the system for assessing the effectiveness of long-term measures of public policy and related management decisions.Lilia A. ValitovaMarina Yu. ShereshevaUral State University of Economicsarticlesustainable developmentsustainability managementregional developmentdynamic aspectintegral indicatorsystem of indicatorsvolga regionsBusinessHF5001-6182FinanceHG1-9999RUУправленец, Vol 11, Iss 3, Pp 18-32 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	sustainable development sustainability management regional development dynamic aspect integral indicator system of indicators volga regions Business HF5001-6182 Finance HG1-9999
spellingShingle	sustainable development sustainability management regional development dynamic aspect integral indicator system of indicators volga regions Business HF5001-6182 Finance HG1-9999 Lilia A. Valitova Marina Yu. Sheresheva Dynamic aspect in territory sustainable development management: The case of the Volga macroregion
description	The paper assesses sustainable development dynamic aspects in territorial management. The relevance of the work is determined by the importance of territorial management based on the principles of sustainable development and the need to scrutinize the socio-environmental and economic potential of the territories in order to create conditions for the full use of available resources without compromising the quality of life of current and future generations. Methodologically, the study rests on the concept of sustainable development, resource theory of economic systems, the dynamic approach to management, and the methodology for constructing integrated indicators and systems of indicators. In the article, the methods of analysis, synthesis, systematization, statistical observation, etc. are applied. Having shown the advantages and disadvantages of integral indicators found in Russian and foreign studies, the authors focus on selecting official statistics data that adequately reflect the state of the economy, population health and welfare, as well as natural capital. An increase in the level of welfare and population social development, while maintaining environmental sustainability, is regarded as the criterion of sustainability. Addressing the case of the Volga macroregion, we characterize the current state of regional development and scrutinize the dynamic aspect, namely the long-term development trajectory of each of the 17 regions. The research analyzes the growth rates of sustainable development indicators for the period of 2010–2017. The study reveals significant differences in the dynamics across the regions. The Republic of Tatarstan and Nizhny Novgorod oblast demonstrate a positive trend in all the components at initially high values, while the Republic of Kalmykia shows the worst dynamics at low values. The authors conclude that the system of indicators is preferable to the integral indicator and the system for assessing the effectiveness of long-term measures of public policy and related management decisions.
format	article
author	Lilia A. Valitova Marina Yu. Sheresheva
author_facet	Lilia A. Valitova Marina Yu. Sheresheva
author_sort	Lilia A. Valitova
title	Dynamic aspect in territory sustainable development management: The case of the Volga macroregion
title_short	Dynamic aspect in territory sustainable development management: The case of the Volga macroregion
title_full	Dynamic aspect in territory sustainable development management: The case of the Volga macroregion
title_fullStr	Dynamic aspect in territory sustainable development management: The case of the Volga macroregion
title_full_unstemmed	Dynamic aspect in territory sustainable development management: The case of the Volga macroregion
title_sort	dynamic aspect in territory sustainable development management: the case of the volga macroregion
publisher	Ural State University of Economics
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/2fccc2a92e0e494884fa7fcd4d20f3b3
work_keys_str_mv	AT liliaavalitova dynamicaspectinterritorysustainabledevelopmentmanagementthecaseofthevolgamacroregion AT marinayusheresheva dynamicaspectinterritorysustainabledevelopmentmanagementthecaseofthevolgamacroregion
_version_	1718398409900032000

Dynamic aspect in territory sustainable development management: The case of the Volga macroregion

Ejemplares similares