Beyond the one-child policy: a response to Conly
The problems with Conly’s proposed ‘one-child’ policy are a good example of where the attempt to limit paternalism becomes self-defeating, and actually ends up potentially aiding the case against controlling population rather than promoting it, as well as negatively influencing the debate about pat...
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Langue: | EN |
| Publié: |
The White Horse Press
2017
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/300d0af711dd4d208b6fa0fb2c532749 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| Résumé: | The problems with Conly’s proposed ‘one-child’ policy are a good example of where the attempt to limit paternalism becomes self-defeating, and actually ends up potentially aiding the case against controlling population rather than promoting it, as well as negatively influencing the debate about paternalism more generally. There are many better potential ways of developing public policy towards population control than a ‘one-child’ policy that synchronise with richer ways to understand individual interests.
|
|---|