Beyond the one-child policy: a response to Conly
The problems with Conly’s proposed ‘one-child’ policy are a good example of where the attempt to limit paternalism becomes self-defeating, and actually ends up potentially aiding the case against controlling population rather than promoting it, as well as negatively influencing the debate about pat...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
The White Horse Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/300d0af711dd4d208b6fa0fb2c532749 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:300d0af711dd4d208b6fa0fb2c532749 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:300d0af711dd4d208b6fa0fb2c5327492021-12-02T19:08:48ZBeyond the one-child policy: a response to Conly2398-54882398-5496https://doaj.org/article/300d0af711dd4d208b6fa0fb2c5327492017-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://whp-journals.co.uk/JPS/article/view/620https://doaj.org/toc/2398-5488https://doaj.org/toc/2398-5496 The problems with Conly’s proposed ‘one-child’ policy are a good example of where the attempt to limit paternalism becomes self-defeating, and actually ends up potentially aiding the case against controlling population rather than promoting it, as well as negatively influencing the debate about paternalism more generally. There are many better potential ways of developing public policy towards population control than a ‘one-child’ policy that synchronise with richer ways to understand individual interests. Julian RocheThe White Horse Pressarticlecoercive paternalismreproductive ethicsreproductive autonomyliberal individualismone child policyEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350Demography. Population. Vital eventsHB848-3697ENThe Journal of Population and Sustainability, Vol 2, Iss 1 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
coercive paternalism reproductive ethics reproductive autonomy liberal individualism one child policy Environmental sciences GE1-350 Demography. Population. Vital events HB848-3697 |
spellingShingle |
coercive paternalism reproductive ethics reproductive autonomy liberal individualism one child policy Environmental sciences GE1-350 Demography. Population. Vital events HB848-3697 Julian Roche Beyond the one-child policy: a response to Conly |
description |
The problems with Conly’s proposed ‘one-child’ policy are a good example of where the attempt to limit paternalism becomes self-defeating, and actually ends up potentially aiding the case against controlling population rather than promoting it, as well as negatively influencing the debate about paternalism more generally. There are many better potential ways of developing public policy towards population control than a ‘one-child’ policy that synchronise with richer ways to understand individual interests.
|
format |
article |
author |
Julian Roche |
author_facet |
Julian Roche |
author_sort |
Julian Roche |
title |
Beyond the one-child policy: a response to Conly |
title_short |
Beyond the one-child policy: a response to Conly |
title_full |
Beyond the one-child policy: a response to Conly |
title_fullStr |
Beyond the one-child policy: a response to Conly |
title_full_unstemmed |
Beyond the one-child policy: a response to Conly |
title_sort |
beyond the one-child policy: a response to conly |
publisher |
The White Horse Press |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/300d0af711dd4d208b6fa0fb2c532749 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT julianroche beyondtheonechildpolicyaresponsetoconly |
_version_ |
1718377139080790016 |