Power and sample size determination in the Rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait.

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) have gained importance in clinical and epidemiological research and aim at assessing quality of life, anxiety or fatigue for instance. Item Response Theory (IRT) models are increasingly used to validate and analyse PRO. Such models relate observed variables to a laten...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alice Guilleux, Myriam Blanchin, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Véronique Sébille
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/300ed274f9294bfcbac453582912f4d0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:300ed274f9294bfcbac453582912f4d0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:300ed274f9294bfcbac453582912f4d02021-11-18T08:38:04ZPower and sample size determination in the Rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0083652https://doaj.org/article/300ed274f9294bfcbac453582912f4d02014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24427276/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) have gained importance in clinical and epidemiological research and aim at assessing quality of life, anxiety or fatigue for instance. Item Response Theory (IRT) models are increasingly used to validate and analyse PRO. Such models relate observed variables to a latent variable (unobservable variable) which is commonly assumed to be normally distributed. A priori sample size determination is important to obtain adequately powered studies to determine clinically important changes in PRO. In previous developments, the Raschpower method has been proposed for the determination of the power of the test of group effect for the comparison of PRO in cross-sectional studies with an IRT model, the Rasch model. The objective of this work was to evaluate the robustness of this method (which assumes a normal distribution for the latent variable) to violations of distributional assumption. The statistical power of the test of group effect was estimated by the empirical rejection rate in data sets simulated using a non-normally distributed latent variable. It was compared to the power obtained with the Raschpower method. In both cases, the data were analyzed using a latent regression Rasch model including a binary covariate for group effect. For all situations, both methods gave comparable results whatever the deviations from the model assumptions. Given the results, the Raschpower method seems to be robust to the non-normality of the latent trait for determining the power of the test of group effect.Alice GuilleuxMyriam BlanchinJean-Benoit HardouinVéronique SébillePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 1, p e83652 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Alice Guilleux
Myriam Blanchin
Jean-Benoit Hardouin
Véronique Sébille
Power and sample size determination in the Rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait.
description Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) have gained importance in clinical and epidemiological research and aim at assessing quality of life, anxiety or fatigue for instance. Item Response Theory (IRT) models are increasingly used to validate and analyse PRO. Such models relate observed variables to a latent variable (unobservable variable) which is commonly assumed to be normally distributed. A priori sample size determination is important to obtain adequately powered studies to determine clinically important changes in PRO. In previous developments, the Raschpower method has been proposed for the determination of the power of the test of group effect for the comparison of PRO in cross-sectional studies with an IRT model, the Rasch model. The objective of this work was to evaluate the robustness of this method (which assumes a normal distribution for the latent variable) to violations of distributional assumption. The statistical power of the test of group effect was estimated by the empirical rejection rate in data sets simulated using a non-normally distributed latent variable. It was compared to the power obtained with the Raschpower method. In both cases, the data were analyzed using a latent regression Rasch model including a binary covariate for group effect. For all situations, both methods gave comparable results whatever the deviations from the model assumptions. Given the results, the Raschpower method seems to be robust to the non-normality of the latent trait for determining the power of the test of group effect.
format article
author Alice Guilleux
Myriam Blanchin
Jean-Benoit Hardouin
Véronique Sébille
author_facet Alice Guilleux
Myriam Blanchin
Jean-Benoit Hardouin
Véronique Sébille
author_sort Alice Guilleux
title Power and sample size determination in the Rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait.
title_short Power and sample size determination in the Rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait.
title_full Power and sample size determination in the Rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait.
title_fullStr Power and sample size determination in the Rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait.
title_full_unstemmed Power and sample size determination in the Rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait.
title_sort power and sample size determination in the rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/300ed274f9294bfcbac453582912f4d0
work_keys_str_mv AT aliceguilleux powerandsamplesizedeterminationintheraschmodelevaluationoftherobustnessofanumericalmethodtononnormalityofthelatenttrait
AT myriamblanchin powerandsamplesizedeterminationintheraschmodelevaluationoftherobustnessofanumericalmethodtononnormalityofthelatenttrait
AT jeanbenoithardouin powerandsamplesizedeterminationintheraschmodelevaluationoftherobustnessofanumericalmethodtononnormalityofthelatenttrait
AT veroniquesebille powerandsamplesizedeterminationintheraschmodelevaluationoftherobustnessofanumericalmethodtononnormalityofthelatenttrait
_version_ 1718421491859587072