The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation

The aim of this study is to examine the results of the experiment when phonologically and acoustically similar and non-similar word lists of four conditions are presented in three different retention intervals. The relevant literature about short trem memory is summarized within the models of Alan B...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Nilgun Cepelioğullar
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN TR
Publicado:	Muhammed Yıldız 2018
Materias:	Working Memory Phonological Similarity Acoustic Similarity Retention Interval Psychology BF1-990
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/304046f6d6d7403f91d0452e107b1676
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:304046f6d6d7403f91d0452e107b1676
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:304046f6d6d7403f91d0452e107b16762021-12-02T11:41:38ZThe Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation10.31461/ybpd.5008042587-15362587-1536https://doaj.org/article/304046f6d6d7403f91d0452e107b16762018-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/605456https://doaj.org/toc/2587-1536https://doaj.org/toc/2587-1536The aim of this study is to examine the results of the experiment when phonologically and acoustically similar and non-similar word lists of four conditions are presented in three different retention intervals. The relevant literature about short trem memory is summarized within the models of Alan Baddeley’s Working Memory Model, James Nairne’s Feature Model and Dylan M. Jones, Robert W. Hughes, William J. Macken’s Perceptual Model. The effects of phonological similarity, acoustic similarity, modality and retention interval are examined through these models. In the present experiment; phonologically and acoustically similar and non-similar lists of five words are presented in four conditions among three different intervals with the participation of 80 students from Uludag University. After examinig the data it was found that phonological similarity had a main effect as the similar lists were recalled less correctly; serial position had a main effect in terms of recency and primacy; and retention interval had a main effect as the longer the interval gets, the recall performance drops. Phonological similarity proved to be effective as opposed to the findings ine the literature found before. Acoustic similarity had no main effect like theorized as the models that focus the importance on the perceptual features. The results are discussed through the relevant literature and the summarized models and suggestions are made regarding the studies that can be carried out from now on. Nilgun CepelioğullarMuhammed YıldızarticleWorking MemoryPhonological SimilarityAcoustic SimilarityRetention IntervalPsychologyBF1-990ENTRYaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi, Vol 2, Iss 4, Pp 429-440 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN TR
topic	Working Memory Phonological Similarity Acoustic Similarity Retention Interval Psychology BF1-990
spellingShingle	Working Memory Phonological Similarity Acoustic Similarity Retention Interval Psychology BF1-990 Nilgun Cepelioğullar The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation
description	The aim of this study is to examine the results of the experiment when phonologically and acoustically similar and non-similar word lists of four conditions are presented in three different retention intervals. The relevant literature about short trem memory is summarized within the models of Alan Baddeley’s Working Memory Model, James Nairne’s Feature Model and Dylan M. Jones, Robert W. Hughes, William J. Macken’s Perceptual Model. The effects of phonological similarity, acoustic similarity, modality and retention interval are examined through these models. In the present experiment; phonologically and acoustically similar and non-similar lists of five words are presented in four conditions among three different intervals with the participation of 80 students from Uludag University. After examinig the data it was found that phonological similarity had a main effect as the similar lists were recalled less correctly; serial position had a main effect in terms of recency and primacy; and retention interval had a main effect as the longer the interval gets, the recall performance drops. Phonological similarity proved to be effective as opposed to the findings ine the literature found before. Acoustic similarity had no main effect like theorized as the models that focus the importance on the perceptual features. The results are discussed through the relevant literature and the summarized models and suggestions are made regarding the studies that can be carried out from now on.
format	article
author	Nilgun Cepelioğullar
author_facet	Nilgun Cepelioğullar
author_sort	Nilgun Cepelioğullar
title	The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation
title_short	The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation
title_full	The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation
title_fullStr	The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation
title_full_unstemmed	The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation
title_sort	interaction between phonological similarity, acoustic similarity and retention interval under audiotry represantation
publisher	Muhammed Yıldız
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/304046f6d6d7403f91d0452e107b1676
work_keys_str_mv	AT nilguncepeliogullar theinteractionbetweenphonologicalsimilarityacousticsimilarityandretentionintervalunderaudiotryrepresantation AT nilguncepeliogullar interactionbetweenphonologicalsimilarityacousticsimilarityandretentionintervalunderaudiotryrepresantation
_version_	1718395391701942272

The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation

Ejemplares similares