Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.

<h4>Background</h4>Placebo groups are used in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to control for placebo effects, which can be large. Participants in trials can misunderstand written information particularly regarding technical aspects of trial design such as randomisation; the adequacy of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Felicity L Bishop, Alison E M Adams, Ted J Kaptchuk, George T Lewith
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/304b14ef463a4d44b30fe1f1995aa2fb
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:304b14ef463a4d44b30fe1f1995aa2fb
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:304b14ef463a4d44b30fe1f1995aa2fb2021-11-18T07:14:13ZInformed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0039661https://doaj.org/article/304b14ef463a4d44b30fe1f1995aa2fb2012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22761859/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Placebo groups are used in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to control for placebo effects, which can be large. Participants in trials can misunderstand written information particularly regarding technical aspects of trial design such as randomisation; the adequacy of written information about placebos has not been explored. We aimed to identify what participants in major RCTs in the UK are told about placebos and their effects.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We conducted a content analysis of 45 Participant Information Leaflets (PILs) using quantitative and qualitative methodologies. PILs were obtained from trials on a major registry of current UK clinical trials (the UKCRN database). Eligible leaflets were received from 44 non-commercial trials but only 1 commercial trial. The main limitation is the low response rate (13.5%), but characteristics of included trials were broadly representative of all non-commercial trials on the database. 84% of PILs were for trials with 50:50 randomisation ratios yet in almost every comparison the target treatments were prioritized over the placebos. Placebos were referred to significantly less frequently than target treatments (7 vs. 27 mentions, p<001) and were significantly less likely than target treatments to be described as triggering either beneficial effects (1 vs. 45, p<001) or adverse effects (4 vs. 39, p<001). 8 PILs (18%) explicitly stated that the placebo treatment was either undesirable or ineffective.<h4>Conclusions</h4>PILs from recent high quality clinical trials emphasise the benefits and adverse effects of the target treatment, while largely ignoring the possible effects of the placebo. Thus they provide incomplete and at times inaccurate information about placebos. Trial participants should be more fully informed about the health changes that they might experience from a placebo. To do otherwise jeopardises informed consent and is inconsistent with not only the science of placebos but also the fundamental rationale underpinning placebo controlled trials.Felicity L BishopAlison E M AdamsTed J KaptchukGeorge T LewithPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 6, p e39661 (2012)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Felicity L Bishop Alison E M Adams Ted J Kaptchuk George T Lewith Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.
description	<h4>Background</h4>Placebo groups are used in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to control for placebo effects, which can be large. Participants in trials can misunderstand written information particularly regarding technical aspects of trial design such as randomisation; the adequacy of written information about placebos has not been explored. We aimed to identify what participants in major RCTs in the UK are told about placebos and their effects.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We conducted a content analysis of 45 Participant Information Leaflets (PILs) using quantitative and qualitative methodologies. PILs were obtained from trials on a major registry of current UK clinical trials (the UKCRN database). Eligible leaflets were received from 44 non-commercial trials but only 1 commercial trial. The main limitation is the low response rate (13.5%), but characteristics of included trials were broadly representative of all non-commercial trials on the database. 84% of PILs were for trials with 50:50 randomisation ratios yet in almost every comparison the target treatments were prioritized over the placebos. Placebos were referred to significantly less frequently than target treatments (7 vs. 27 mentions, p<001) and were significantly less likely than target treatments to be described as triggering either beneficial effects (1 vs. 45, p<001) or adverse effects (4 vs. 39, p<001). 8 PILs (18%) explicitly stated that the placebo treatment was either undesirable or ineffective.<h4>Conclusions</h4>PILs from recent high quality clinical trials emphasise the benefits and adverse effects of the target treatment, while largely ignoring the possible effects of the placebo. Thus they provide incomplete and at times inaccurate information about placebos. Trial participants should be more fully informed about the health changes that they might experience from a placebo. To do otherwise jeopardises informed consent and is inconsistent with not only the science of placebos but also the fundamental rationale underpinning placebo controlled trials.
format	article
author	Felicity L Bishop Alison E M Adams Ted J Kaptchuk George T Lewith
author_facet	Felicity L Bishop Alison E M Adams Ted J Kaptchuk George T Lewith
author_sort	Felicity L Bishop
title	Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.
title_short	Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.
title_full	Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.
title_fullStr	Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.
title_full_unstemmed	Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.
title_sort	informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2012
url	https://doaj.org/article/304b14ef463a4d44b30fe1f1995aa2fb
work_keys_str_mv	AT felicitylbishop informedconsentandplaceboeffectsacontentanalysisofinformationleafletstoidentifywhatclinicaltrialparticipantsaretoldaboutplacebos AT alisonemadams informedconsentandplaceboeffectsacontentanalysisofinformationleafletstoidentifywhatclinicaltrialparticipantsaretoldaboutplacebos AT tedjkaptchuk informedconsentandplaceboeffectsacontentanalysisofinformationleafletstoidentifywhatclinicaltrialparticipantsaretoldaboutplacebos AT georgetlewith informedconsentandplaceboeffectsacontentanalysisofinformationleafletstoidentifywhatclinicaltrialparticipantsaretoldaboutplacebos
_version_	1718423716340170752

Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.

Ejemplares similares