Social Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications

To limit global warming, the use of carbon capture and storage technologies (CCS) is considered to be of major importance. In addition to the technical–economic, ecological and political aspects, the question of social acceptance is a decisive factor for the implementation of such low-carbon technol...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Katja Witte
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/30666d248dcd4b78bf34cde2243f9e09
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:30666d248dcd4b78bf34cde2243f9e09
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:30666d248dcd4b78bf34cde2243f9e092021-11-11T19:49:57ZSocial Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications10.3390/su1321122782071-1050https://doaj.org/article/30666d248dcd4b78bf34cde2243f9e092021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12278https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050To limit global warming, the use of carbon capture and storage technologies (CCS) is considered to be of major importance. In addition to the technical–economic, ecological and political aspects, the question of social acceptance is a decisive factor for the implementation of such low-carbon technologies. This study is the first literature review addressing the acceptance of industrial CCS (iCCS). In contrast to electricity generation, the technical options for large-scale reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the energy-intensive industry sector are not sufficient to achieve the targeted GHG neutrality in the industrial sector without the use of CCS. Therefore, it will be crucial to determine which factors influence the acceptance of iCCS and how these findings can be used for policy and industry decision-making processes. The results show that there has been limited research on the acceptance of iCCS. In addition, the study highlights some important differences between the acceptance of iCCS and CCS. Due to the technical diversity of future iCCS applications, future acceptance research must be able to better address the complexity of the research subject.Katja WitteMDPI AGarticlecarbon captureacceptancepublic perceptionindustrial applicationsliterature reviewknowledgeEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12278, p 12278 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic carbon capture
acceptance
public perception
industrial applications
literature review
knowledge
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle carbon capture
acceptance
public perception
industrial applications
literature review
knowledge
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Katja Witte
Social Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications
description To limit global warming, the use of carbon capture and storage technologies (CCS) is considered to be of major importance. In addition to the technical–economic, ecological and political aspects, the question of social acceptance is a decisive factor for the implementation of such low-carbon technologies. This study is the first literature review addressing the acceptance of industrial CCS (iCCS). In contrast to electricity generation, the technical options for large-scale reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the energy-intensive industry sector are not sufficient to achieve the targeted GHG neutrality in the industrial sector without the use of CCS. Therefore, it will be crucial to determine which factors influence the acceptance of iCCS and how these findings can be used for policy and industry decision-making processes. The results show that there has been limited research on the acceptance of iCCS. In addition, the study highlights some important differences between the acceptance of iCCS and CCS. Due to the technical diversity of future iCCS applications, future acceptance research must be able to better address the complexity of the research subject.
format article
author Katja Witte
author_facet Katja Witte
author_sort Katja Witte
title Social Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications
title_short Social Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications
title_full Social Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications
title_fullStr Social Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications
title_full_unstemmed Social Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications
title_sort social acceptance of carbon capture and storage (ccs) from industrial applications
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/30666d248dcd4b78bf34cde2243f9e09
work_keys_str_mv AT katjawitte socialacceptanceofcarboncaptureandstorageccsfromindustrialapplications
_version_ 1718431400863989760