Mitigation of Particulate Matter and Airborne Pathogens in Swine Barn Emissions with Filtration and UV-A Photocatalysis

This study evaluated the use of filtration and UV-A photocatalysis for the reduction of particulate matter (PM) and airborne bacterial pathogens in swine barns. Two MERV filters (8 and 15) were used to mitigate PM concentrations measured at the PM 1, PM 2.5, respirable PM, and PM 10 ranges. Filtrati...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myeongseong Lee, Jacek A. Koziel, Nubia R. Macedo, Peiyang Li, Baitong Chen, William S. Jenks, Jeffrey Zimmerman, R. Vincent Paris
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3094d9932b7a46d298f21422ecab2f9f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3094d9932b7a46d298f21422ecab2f9f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3094d9932b7a46d298f21422ecab2f9f2021-11-25T17:05:39ZMitigation of Particulate Matter and Airborne Pathogens in Swine Barn Emissions with Filtration and UV-A Photocatalysis10.3390/catal111113022073-4344https://doaj.org/article/3094d9932b7a46d298f21422ecab2f9f2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/11/11/1302https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4344This study evaluated the use of filtration and UV-A photocatalysis for the reduction of particulate matter (PM) and airborne bacterial pathogens in swine barns. Two MERV filters (8 and 15) were used to mitigate PM concentrations measured at the PM 1, PM 2.5, respirable PM, and PM 10 ranges. Filtration was also used to generate different levels of airborne pathogens to be treated by UV-A. Results show that MERV 8 and 15 filters effectively reduced PM concentrations (96–98%) in air exhausted from a swine barn (<i>p</i> ranged from <0.01 to 0.04). UV-A photocatalysis did not mitigate PM concentrations. UV-A photocatalysis treatment reduced measured colony-forming units (CFUs) by 15–95%. The CFU percent reduction was higher when airborne PM concentration was low. The numeric results suggested a real mitigation effect despite <i>p</i>-values that did not meet the usual statistical cut-off of <0.05 for significance due to the large variability of the CFU control samples. Normalization of measured airborne pathogen concentrations by smaller PM size range concentrations led to emerging significant treatment differences for CFUs. A significant decrease (~51% reduction; <i>p</i> < 0.02) in the concentration of viable airborne bacteria was shown for all PM below the 10 micron range.Myeongseong LeeJacek A. KozielNubia R. MacedoPeiyang LiBaitong ChenWilliam S. JenksJeffrey ZimmermanR. Vincent ParisMDPI AGarticleair pollution controlbiosecurityanimal diseasesultraviolet lightadvanced oxidationfiltrationChemical technologyTP1-1185ChemistryQD1-999ENCatalysts, Vol 11, Iss 1302, p 1302 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic air pollution control
biosecurity
animal diseases
ultraviolet light
advanced oxidation
filtration
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle air pollution control
biosecurity
animal diseases
ultraviolet light
advanced oxidation
filtration
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
Chemistry
QD1-999
Myeongseong Lee
Jacek A. Koziel
Nubia R. Macedo
Peiyang Li
Baitong Chen
William S. Jenks
Jeffrey Zimmerman
R. Vincent Paris
Mitigation of Particulate Matter and Airborne Pathogens in Swine Barn Emissions with Filtration and UV-A Photocatalysis
description This study evaluated the use of filtration and UV-A photocatalysis for the reduction of particulate matter (PM) and airborne bacterial pathogens in swine barns. Two MERV filters (8 and 15) were used to mitigate PM concentrations measured at the PM 1, PM 2.5, respirable PM, and PM 10 ranges. Filtration was also used to generate different levels of airborne pathogens to be treated by UV-A. Results show that MERV 8 and 15 filters effectively reduced PM concentrations (96–98%) in air exhausted from a swine barn (<i>p</i> ranged from <0.01 to 0.04). UV-A photocatalysis did not mitigate PM concentrations. UV-A photocatalysis treatment reduced measured colony-forming units (CFUs) by 15–95%. The CFU percent reduction was higher when airborne PM concentration was low. The numeric results suggested a real mitigation effect despite <i>p</i>-values that did not meet the usual statistical cut-off of <0.05 for significance due to the large variability of the CFU control samples. Normalization of measured airborne pathogen concentrations by smaller PM size range concentrations led to emerging significant treatment differences for CFUs. A significant decrease (~51% reduction; <i>p</i> < 0.02) in the concentration of viable airborne bacteria was shown for all PM below the 10 micron range.
format article
author Myeongseong Lee
Jacek A. Koziel
Nubia R. Macedo
Peiyang Li
Baitong Chen
William S. Jenks
Jeffrey Zimmerman
R. Vincent Paris
author_facet Myeongseong Lee
Jacek A. Koziel
Nubia R. Macedo
Peiyang Li
Baitong Chen
William S. Jenks
Jeffrey Zimmerman
R. Vincent Paris
author_sort Myeongseong Lee
title Mitigation of Particulate Matter and Airborne Pathogens in Swine Barn Emissions with Filtration and UV-A Photocatalysis
title_short Mitigation of Particulate Matter and Airborne Pathogens in Swine Barn Emissions with Filtration and UV-A Photocatalysis
title_full Mitigation of Particulate Matter and Airborne Pathogens in Swine Barn Emissions with Filtration and UV-A Photocatalysis
title_fullStr Mitigation of Particulate Matter and Airborne Pathogens in Swine Barn Emissions with Filtration and UV-A Photocatalysis
title_full_unstemmed Mitigation of Particulate Matter and Airborne Pathogens in Swine Barn Emissions with Filtration and UV-A Photocatalysis
title_sort mitigation of particulate matter and airborne pathogens in swine barn emissions with filtration and uv-a photocatalysis
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3094d9932b7a46d298f21422ecab2f9f
work_keys_str_mv AT myeongseonglee mitigationofparticulatematterandairbornepathogensinswinebarnemissionswithfiltrationanduvaphotocatalysis
AT jacekakoziel mitigationofparticulatematterandairbornepathogensinswinebarnemissionswithfiltrationanduvaphotocatalysis
AT nubiarmacedo mitigationofparticulatematterandairbornepathogensinswinebarnemissionswithfiltrationanduvaphotocatalysis
AT peiyangli mitigationofparticulatematterandairbornepathogensinswinebarnemissionswithfiltrationanduvaphotocatalysis
AT baitongchen mitigationofparticulatematterandairbornepathogensinswinebarnemissionswithfiltrationanduvaphotocatalysis
AT williamsjenks mitigationofparticulatematterandairbornepathogensinswinebarnemissionswithfiltrationanduvaphotocatalysis
AT jeffreyzimmerman mitigationofparticulatematterandairbornepathogensinswinebarnemissionswithfiltrationanduvaphotocatalysis
AT rvincentparis mitigationofparticulatematterandairbornepathogensinswinebarnemissionswithfiltrationanduvaphotocatalysis
_version_ 1718412705937752064