Sociological Realism
Ever since its revelation more than fourteen hundred years ago, the Qur’an has been the object of recitation and memorization, as well as scholarly analysis by millions in every generation. During this long span of time, not only religious scholars and jurists, but also other professionals like phy...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
1991
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/30cac572e96e43c093da24efda7754fe |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Ever since its revelation more than fourteen hundred years ago, the Qur’an
has been the object of recitation and memorization, as well as scholarly analysis
by millions in every generation. During this long span of time, not only
religious scholars and jurists, but also other professionals like physicists,
medical doctors, historians, and orientalists have tried to scrutinize and analyze
the Qur’an. It is about time that sociologists paid attention to this primary
source of Islam.
Sociological interest in the Qur’an, as belated as it is, is in fact natural,
for, after a brief foray in the direction of what one may call Origin IheoZogy,
the basic thrust of the Qur’an remains ideological- humanity and its society
in this world. Not that this is such a revealing idea. Whether one looks at
it from a juristic point of view or from a historical perspective, it hardly
escapes notice that the Qur’anic verses speak out loudly about the nature
of plural living as fabricated by the crisscrossing episodes generated by very
active, assertive, and expressive individuals over the course of history. Most
of what has been going on in Islamic studies, under the rubric of law and
history in particular, provides us with sufficient encouragement to cast a fresh
look at the same source of knowledge.
Questions Sociological Theory Should Answer
As we have already seen, sociologists have at different times asked different
and disparate, although quite relevant, questions. They have also been
insufficient questions. For example, symbolic interactionists remained interested
primarily in the indeterminstic nature of the human act. This microscopic
preoccupation prevented them from asking questions about social processes
of a larger magnitude. Even Blumer’s emphasis on collective behavior, which
showed an early promise for the analysis of revolutionary social change, has
had only scant appeal for his fellow symbolic interactionists.
On the other hand, structural-functionalists as well as conflict theorists
remained interested in the deterministic nature of the macro social order ...
|
|---|