Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies?
H. Bart van der Worp and colleagues discuss the controversies and possibilities of translating the results of animal experiments into human clinical trials.
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | H Bart van der Worp, David W Howells, Emily S Sena, Michelle J Porritt, Sarah Rewell, Victoria O'Collins, Malcolm R Macleod |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/30db6f0e822d428383098e05471007b2 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy.
por: Emily S Sena, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Evaluation of excess significance bias in animal studies of neurological diseases.
por: Konstantinos K Tsilidis, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.
por: Ana Antonic, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Using median survival in meta-analysis of experimental time-to-event data
por: Theodore C. Hirst, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Information can explain the dynamics of group order in animal collective behaviour
por: Hannah E. A. MacGregor, et al.
Publicado: (2020)