Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument

Objective. This work aimed to evaluate validity and reliability to measure the technological competency of Nursing in Colombia of the Spanish version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument (TCCNI). Methods. This was a test validation study, which evaluated linguistic, facia...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel Andrés Rincón Álvarez, Lorena Chaparro Díaz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Universidad de Antioquia 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/312e7dfb25d74f778823bd8745d78312
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:312e7dfb25d74f778823bd8745d78312
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:312e7dfb25d74f778823bd8745d783122021-11-27T15:06:49ZValidity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument2216-028010.17533/udea.iee.v35n1a04https://doaj.org/article/312e7dfb25d74f778823bd8745d783122017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/iee/article/view/328030https://doaj.org/toc/2216-0280Objective. This work aimed to evaluate validity and reliability to measure the technological competency of Nursing in Colombia of the Spanish version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument (TCCNI). Methods. This was a test validation study, which evaluated linguistic, facial, content, and construct validity, besides, the instrument’s reliability. Results. The instrument reported face validity with Lawshe’s index: clarity 0.86, precision 0.83, and comprehension 0.89. Agreement of Fleiss’ kappa index was clarity 0.75, precision 0.72, and comprehension 0.81. Content validity was obtained with Lawshe’s index: relevance of 0.9 and pertinence of 0.9. Agreement of experts with Fleiss’ kappa index was relevance at 0.9 and pertinence at 0.9. For construct validity, 255 nurses participated. Factor analysis generated six factors (Knowing is Caring, Professional and Disciplinary Values of Nursing, Care and Ethics, Technological Competency, Healing and Human Care), which yielded a total accumulated variance of 54.2% and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.88. Conclusion. The TCCNI Spanish version reported a consolidated validity, becoming a viable and reliable instrument to measure the technological competency of Nursing in Colombia.   How to cite this article: Rincón DA, Chaparro L. Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2017; 35(2):154-164.Daniel Andrés Rincón ÁlvarezLorena Chaparro DíazUniversidad de Antioquiaarticlevalidation studiesmodelsnursingprofessional competencenurses.NursingRT1-120ENInvestigación y Educación en Enfermería, Vol 35, Iss 2 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic validation studies
models
nursing
professional competence
nurses.
Nursing
RT1-120
spellingShingle validation studies
models
nursing
professional competence
nurses.
Nursing
RT1-120
Daniel Andrés Rincón Álvarez
Lorena Chaparro Díaz
Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument
description Objective. This work aimed to evaluate validity and reliability to measure the technological competency of Nursing in Colombia of the Spanish version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument (TCCNI). Methods. This was a test validation study, which evaluated linguistic, facial, content, and construct validity, besides, the instrument’s reliability. Results. The instrument reported face validity with Lawshe’s index: clarity 0.86, precision 0.83, and comprehension 0.89. Agreement of Fleiss’ kappa index was clarity 0.75, precision 0.72, and comprehension 0.81. Content validity was obtained with Lawshe’s index: relevance of 0.9 and pertinence of 0.9. Agreement of experts with Fleiss’ kappa index was relevance at 0.9 and pertinence at 0.9. For construct validity, 255 nurses participated. Factor analysis generated six factors (Knowing is Caring, Professional and Disciplinary Values of Nursing, Care and Ethics, Technological Competency, Healing and Human Care), which yielded a total accumulated variance of 54.2% and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.88. Conclusion. The TCCNI Spanish version reported a consolidated validity, becoming a viable and reliable instrument to measure the technological competency of Nursing in Colombia.   How to cite this article: Rincón DA, Chaparro L. Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2017; 35(2):154-164.
format article
author Daniel Andrés Rincón Álvarez
Lorena Chaparro Díaz
author_facet Daniel Andrés Rincón Álvarez
Lorena Chaparro Díaz
author_sort Daniel Andrés Rincón Álvarez
title Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument
title_short Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument
title_full Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument
title_sort validity and reliability of the spanish version of the technological competency as caring in nursing instrument
publisher Universidad de Antioquia
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/312e7dfb25d74f778823bd8745d78312
work_keys_str_mv AT danielandresrinconalvarez validityandreliabilityofthespanishversionofthetechnologicalcompetencyascaringinnursinginstrument
AT lorenachaparrodiaz validityandreliabilityofthespanishversionofthetechnologicalcompetencyascaringinnursinginstrument
_version_ 1718408490897113088