“Privilege” Factor in Economic Policy of Bolsheviks and Kronstadt Rebellion

The influence of the Kronstadt mutiny (March 1921) on the change in the economic course of the Bolsheviks is analyzed. The results of a comparative analysis of different conceptual approaches to its interpretation as a factor of influence are presented. The authors consider the food dictatorship to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	A. Yu. Davydov, V. V. Khutsieva
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2021
Materias:	bolsheviks war communism peasantry kronstadt mutiny privilege nep tax in kind Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/314389d516254827b2e1b27db0be7ffc
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:314389d516254827b2e1b27db0be7ffc
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:314389d516254827b2e1b27db0be7ffc2021-12-02T07:58:15Z“Privilege” Factor in Economic Policy of Bolsheviks and Kronstadt Rebellion2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2021-10-343-358https://doaj.org/article/314389d516254827b2e1b27db0be7ffc2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3288https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The influence of the Kronstadt mutiny (March 1921) on the change in the economic course of the Bolsheviks is analyzed. The results of a comparative analysis of different conceptual approaches to its interpretation as a factor of influence are presented. The authors consider the food dictatorship to be the fundamental principle of war communism, periodically softened by campaigns to endow workers with “privileges” in the form of the right to transport food; contemporaries talked about “benefits”. An overview of events, which allows us to consider “privileges” as the main factor in the activation of illegal market relations in 1918—1921is provided in the article. Its novelty lies in the attribution of the Kronstadt mutiny as an essential reason for the transition of the Leninist leadership not to the NEP, but to the next “privileged” operation. At the same time, the authors of the article argue that the accumulation of concessions (“privileges”), accelerated by the rebellion, led in August 1921 to the legalization of freedom of trade and to the NEP. Great attention is paid to the issue of the social basis of the mutiny, since, among other things, the authors see the sources of fearlessness and despair of the insurgents in this circumstance. A. Davydov and V. Khutsieva prove that the rebels primarily acted on behalf of that part of the peasantry that managed to save their bread from the Bolshevik requisitions.A. Yu. DavydovV. V. KhutsievaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticlebolshevikswar communismpeasantrykronstadt mutinyprivilegeneptax in kindSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 10, Pp 343-358 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	bolsheviks war communism peasantry kronstadt mutiny privilege nep tax in kind Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	bolsheviks war communism peasantry kronstadt mutiny privilege nep tax in kind Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 A. Yu. Davydov V. V. Khutsieva “Privilege” Factor in Economic Policy of Bolsheviks and Kronstadt Rebellion
description	The influence of the Kronstadt mutiny (March 1921) on the change in the economic course of the Bolsheviks is analyzed. The results of a comparative analysis of different conceptual approaches to its interpretation as a factor of influence are presented. The authors consider the food dictatorship to be the fundamental principle of war communism, periodically softened by campaigns to endow workers with “privileges” in the form of the right to transport food; contemporaries talked about “benefits”. An overview of events, which allows us to consider “privileges” as the main factor in the activation of illegal market relations in 1918—1921is provided in the article. Its novelty lies in the attribution of the Kronstadt mutiny as an essential reason for the transition of the Leninist leadership not to the NEP, but to the next “privileged” operation. At the same time, the authors of the article argue that the accumulation of concessions (“privileges”), accelerated by the rebellion, led in August 1921 to the legalization of freedom of trade and to the NEP. Great attention is paid to the issue of the social basis of the mutiny, since, among other things, the authors see the sources of fearlessness and despair of the insurgents in this circumstance. A. Davydov and V. Khutsieva prove that the rebels primarily acted on behalf of that part of the peasantry that managed to save their bread from the Bolshevik requisitions.
format	article
author	A. Yu. Davydov V. V. Khutsieva
author_facet	A. Yu. Davydov V. V. Khutsieva
author_sort	A. Yu. Davydov
title	“Privilege” Factor in Economic Policy of Bolsheviks and Kronstadt Rebellion
title_short	“Privilege” Factor in Economic Policy of Bolsheviks and Kronstadt Rebellion
title_full	“Privilege” Factor in Economic Policy of Bolsheviks and Kronstadt Rebellion
title_fullStr	“Privilege” Factor in Economic Policy of Bolsheviks and Kronstadt Rebellion
title_full_unstemmed	“Privilege” Factor in Economic Policy of Bolsheviks and Kronstadt Rebellion
title_sort	“privilege” factor in economic policy of bolsheviks and kronstadt rebellion
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/314389d516254827b2e1b27db0be7ffc
work_keys_str_mv	AT ayudavydov privilegefactorineconomicpolicyofbolsheviksandkronstadtrebellion AT vvkhutsieva privilegefactorineconomicpolicyofbolsheviksandkronstadtrebellion
_version_	1718398713945128960

“Privilege” Factor in Economic Policy of Bolsheviks and Kronstadt Rebellion

Ejemplares similares