Treatment persistence and cost-effectiveness of latanoprost/latanoprost–timolol, bimatoprost/bimatoprost–timolol, and travoprost/travoprost–timolol in glaucoma: an analysis based on the United Kingdom general practitioner research database
Antoine Lafuma1, John F Salmon2, Julien Robert1, Gilles Berdeaux31Cemka, Bourg-la-Reine, France; 2Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford, UK; 3Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Chaire Economie et Gestion des Services de Santé, Paris, FranceObjective: To compare treatment...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Antoine Lafuma, John F Salmon, Julien Robert, et al |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/315a710ed4e14123a2e0ed956083aceb |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison between bimatoprost and latanoprost-timolol fixed combination for efficacy and safety after switching patients from latanoprost
por: Maruyama Y, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Efficacy and safety of fixed-combination travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% in patients transitioning from bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% combination therapy
por: Schnober D, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Efficacy and safety of travoprost/timolol vs dorzolamide/timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
por: Miguel A Teus, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Effect of preservative removal from fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol on intraocular pressure lowering: a potential timolol dose–response phenomenon
por: Shen J, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Efficacy of the travoprost/timolol fixed combination versus the concomitant use of travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.1% gel formulation
por: Kozobolis V, et al.
Publicado: (2018)