Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression
Differential expression analysis of single-cell transcriptomics allows scientists to dissect cell-type-specific responses to biological perturbations. Here, the authors show that many commonly used methods are biased and can produce false discoveries.
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Jordan W. Squair, Matthieu Gautier, Claudia Kathe, Mark A. Anderson, Nicholas D. James, Thomas H. Hutson, Rémi Hudelle, Taha Qaiser, Kaya J. E. Matson, Quentin Barraud, Ariel J. Levine, Gioele La Manno, Michael A. Skinnider, Grégoire Courtine |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/315bac3c84574451adbbba4a10948a12 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Confronting the paradox of enrichment to the metacommunity perspective.
por: Céline Hauzy, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Discrete False-Discovery Rate Improves Identification of Differentially Abundant Microbes
por: Lingjing Jiang, et al.
Publicado: (2017) - Confrontation
-
Multi-pronged neuromodulation intervention engages the residual motor circuitry to facilitate walking in a rat model of spinal cord injury
por: Marco Bonizzato, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Secularism Confronts Islam
por: David L. Johnston
Publicado: (2009)