Considerations on Acoustic Mapping Velocimetry (AMV) Application for in-situ Measurement of Bedform Dynamics

Non-intrusive technologies for the in-situ measurement of river morphological features are increasingly popular in the scientific and practice communities due to their efficient and productive data acquisition. While the measurement of suspended load with optical and acoustic technologies is current...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: H. You, M. Muste, D. Kim, S. Baranya
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/318e5d2d28404b95b08c2736513a8199
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:318e5d2d28404b95b08c2736513a8199
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:318e5d2d28404b95b08c2736513a81992021-11-04T09:31:22ZConsiderations on Acoustic Mapping Velocimetry (AMV) Application for in-situ Measurement of Bedform Dynamics2624-937510.3389/frwa.2021.715308https://doaj.org/article/318e5d2d28404b95b08c2736513a81992021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frwa.2021.715308/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2624-9375Non-intrusive technologies for the in-situ measurement of river morphological features are increasingly popular in the scientific and practice communities due to their efficient and productive data acquisition. While the measurement of suspended load with optical and acoustic technologies is currently an active area of research, the measurement of bedform dynamics has not experienced similar progress. We have successfully demonstrated through laboratory experiments that, by combining acoustic mapping with image velocimetry concepts, we can characterize the planar dynamics of the bedform migration. The technique, labeled Acoustic Mapping Velocimetry (AMV), is currently transferred to field conditions using multiple-beam echo-sounders (MBES) for producing acoustic maps. During this transfer, new questions emerged because, in field conditions, many of the morphologic features targeted by AMV measurements are not a priori known. Moreover, the image velocimetry processing can be approached with several alternatives, each of them characterized by strength and limitations. This paper assembles guidelines for establishing optimal parameters for the acquisition of the acoustic maps based on analytical considerations, and for selecting essential features of the processing for image velocimetry. We test these guidelines using MBES data acquired in the Mississippi River.H. YouM. MusteD. KimS. BaranyaFrontiers Media S.A.articlebedform geometrybedform dynamicsacoustic mappingimage velocimetryacoustic mapping velocimetryEnvironmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066ENFrontiers in Water, Vol 3 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic bedform geometry
bedform dynamics
acoustic mapping
image velocimetry
acoustic mapping velocimetry
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
spellingShingle bedform geometry
bedform dynamics
acoustic mapping
image velocimetry
acoustic mapping velocimetry
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
H. You
M. Muste
D. Kim
S. Baranya
Considerations on Acoustic Mapping Velocimetry (AMV) Application for in-situ Measurement of Bedform Dynamics
description Non-intrusive technologies for the in-situ measurement of river morphological features are increasingly popular in the scientific and practice communities due to their efficient and productive data acquisition. While the measurement of suspended load with optical and acoustic technologies is currently an active area of research, the measurement of bedform dynamics has not experienced similar progress. We have successfully demonstrated through laboratory experiments that, by combining acoustic mapping with image velocimetry concepts, we can characterize the planar dynamics of the bedform migration. The technique, labeled Acoustic Mapping Velocimetry (AMV), is currently transferred to field conditions using multiple-beam echo-sounders (MBES) for producing acoustic maps. During this transfer, new questions emerged because, in field conditions, many of the morphologic features targeted by AMV measurements are not a priori known. Moreover, the image velocimetry processing can be approached with several alternatives, each of them characterized by strength and limitations. This paper assembles guidelines for establishing optimal parameters for the acquisition of the acoustic maps based on analytical considerations, and for selecting essential features of the processing for image velocimetry. We test these guidelines using MBES data acquired in the Mississippi River.
format article
author H. You
M. Muste
D. Kim
S. Baranya
author_facet H. You
M. Muste
D. Kim
S. Baranya
author_sort H. You
title Considerations on Acoustic Mapping Velocimetry (AMV) Application for in-situ Measurement of Bedform Dynamics
title_short Considerations on Acoustic Mapping Velocimetry (AMV) Application for in-situ Measurement of Bedform Dynamics
title_full Considerations on Acoustic Mapping Velocimetry (AMV) Application for in-situ Measurement of Bedform Dynamics
title_fullStr Considerations on Acoustic Mapping Velocimetry (AMV) Application for in-situ Measurement of Bedform Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Considerations on Acoustic Mapping Velocimetry (AMV) Application for in-situ Measurement of Bedform Dynamics
title_sort considerations on acoustic mapping velocimetry (amv) application for in-situ measurement of bedform dynamics
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/318e5d2d28404b95b08c2736513a8199
work_keys_str_mv AT hyou considerationsonacousticmappingvelocimetryamvapplicationforinsitumeasurementofbedformdynamics
AT mmuste considerationsonacousticmappingvelocimetryamvapplicationforinsitumeasurementofbedformdynamics
AT dkim considerationsonacousticmappingvelocimetryamvapplicationforinsitumeasurementofbedformdynamics
AT sbaranya considerationsonacousticmappingvelocimetryamvapplicationforinsitumeasurementofbedformdynamics
_version_ 1718444950959423488