Working memory load reduces corticospinal suppression to former go and trained no-go cues

Abstract Environmental cues associated with an action can prime the motor system, decreasing response times and activating motor regions of the brain. However, when task goals change, the same responses to former go-associated cues are no longer required and motor priming needs to be inhibited to av...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dominic M. D. Tran, William G. Nicholson, Justin A. Harris, Irina M. Harris, Evan J. Livesey
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/31a97b613a674fb29a7cbfb28daf6ba5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:31a97b613a674fb29a7cbfb28daf6ba5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:31a97b613a674fb29a7cbfb28daf6ba52021-12-02T15:57:03ZWorking memory load reduces corticospinal suppression to former go and trained no-go cues10.1038/s41598-021-91040-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/31a97b613a674fb29a7cbfb28daf6ba52021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91040-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Environmental cues associated with an action can prime the motor system, decreasing response times and activating motor regions of the brain. However, when task goals change, the same responses to former go-associated cues are no longer required and motor priming needs to be inhibited to avoid unwanted behavioural errors. The present study tested whether the inhibition of motor system activity to presentations of former go cues is reliant on top-down, goal-directed cognitive control processes using a working memory (WM) load manipulation. Applying transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex to measure motor system activity during a Go/No-go task, we found that under low WM, corticospinal excitability was suppressed to former go and trained no-go cues relative to control cues. Under high WM, the cortical suppression to former go cues was reduced, suggesting that the underlying mechanism required executive control. Unexpectedly, we found a similar result for trained no-go cues and showed in a second experiment that the corticospinal suppression and WM effects were unrelated to local inhibitory function as indexed by short-interval intracortical inhibition. Our findings reveal that the interaction between former response cues and WM is complex and we discuss possible explanations of our findings in relation to models of response inhibition.Dominic M. D. TranWilliam G. NicholsonJustin A. HarrisIrina M. HarrisEvan J. LiveseyNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Dominic M. D. Tran
William G. Nicholson
Justin A. Harris
Irina M. Harris
Evan J. Livesey
Working memory load reduces corticospinal suppression to former go and trained no-go cues
description Abstract Environmental cues associated with an action can prime the motor system, decreasing response times and activating motor regions of the brain. However, when task goals change, the same responses to former go-associated cues are no longer required and motor priming needs to be inhibited to avoid unwanted behavioural errors. The present study tested whether the inhibition of motor system activity to presentations of former go cues is reliant on top-down, goal-directed cognitive control processes using a working memory (WM) load manipulation. Applying transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex to measure motor system activity during a Go/No-go task, we found that under low WM, corticospinal excitability was suppressed to former go and trained no-go cues relative to control cues. Under high WM, the cortical suppression to former go cues was reduced, suggesting that the underlying mechanism required executive control. Unexpectedly, we found a similar result for trained no-go cues and showed in a second experiment that the corticospinal suppression and WM effects were unrelated to local inhibitory function as indexed by short-interval intracortical inhibition. Our findings reveal that the interaction between former response cues and WM is complex and we discuss possible explanations of our findings in relation to models of response inhibition.
format article
author Dominic M. D. Tran
William G. Nicholson
Justin A. Harris
Irina M. Harris
Evan J. Livesey
author_facet Dominic M. D. Tran
William G. Nicholson
Justin A. Harris
Irina M. Harris
Evan J. Livesey
author_sort Dominic M. D. Tran
title Working memory load reduces corticospinal suppression to former go and trained no-go cues
title_short Working memory load reduces corticospinal suppression to former go and trained no-go cues
title_full Working memory load reduces corticospinal suppression to former go and trained no-go cues
title_fullStr Working memory load reduces corticospinal suppression to former go and trained no-go cues
title_full_unstemmed Working memory load reduces corticospinal suppression to former go and trained no-go cues
title_sort working memory load reduces corticospinal suppression to former go and trained no-go cues
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/31a97b613a674fb29a7cbfb28daf6ba5
work_keys_str_mv AT dominicmdtran workingmemoryloadreducescorticospinalsuppressiontoformergoandtrainednogocues
AT williamgnicholson workingmemoryloadreducescorticospinalsuppressiontoformergoandtrainednogocues
AT justinaharris workingmemoryloadreducescorticospinalsuppressiontoformergoandtrainednogocues
AT irinamharris workingmemoryloadreducescorticospinalsuppressiontoformergoandtrainednogocues
AT evanjlivesey workingmemoryloadreducescorticospinalsuppressiontoformergoandtrainednogocues
_version_ 1718385383468695552