Performance of potential evapotranspiration models in Peninsular Malaysia
Potential evapotranspiration (PET) is an important parameter for the operation of irrigation projects and water resources management. The globally recognized PET estimation model, the FAO-56 Penman–Monteith (FAO-56 PM) model, had been criticized for its requirement of many detailed meteorological va...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
IWA Publishing
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/31d92381d16842ea849f151c34fdbf6a |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Potential evapotranspiration (PET) is an important parameter for the operation of irrigation projects and water resources management. The globally recognized PET estimation model, the FAO-56 Penman–Monteith (FAO-56 PM) model, had been criticized for its requirement of many detailed meteorological variables, but nevertheless has been accepted as the baseline model in many worldwide studies. The performances of different PET models can be found to be excellent for a specific location but may not be representative in other regions. The aim of this study is to select the most suitable PET model to estimate PET in Malaysia. Three radiation-based models and four temperature-based models were compared with the FAO-56 PM model at seven selected meteorological stations in Peninsular Malaysia. The mean bias error, relative error (Re) and normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) were used to evaluate the performances of the PET models. The Re values of Turc models were below 0.2 at all stations, while Priestly–Taylor, Thornthwaite, Thornthwaite-corrected and Blaney–Criddle models were above 0.2. The Makkink and Hargreaves–Samani models were below 0.2 at most of the stations. Thus, the Turc model was recommended as the best model to estimate PET in Peninsular Malaysia. HIGHLIGHTS
This study applied various empirical potential evapotranspiration (PET) models to estimate the PET.;
Radiation-based models and temperature-based models were compared with the FAO Penman–Monteith model.;
MBE, Re, NRMSE and R2 were used to evaluate the performances of PET models.;
The Turc model was found to give superior performance.;
The outcomes can be used as a reference for water resources-related project design.; |
|---|