Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals.
<h4>Background</h4>It is not clear which research misconduct policies are adopted by biomedical journals. This study assessed the prevalence and content policies of the most influential biomedical journals on misconduct and procedures for handling and responding to allegations of miscond...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Xavier Bosch, Cristina Hernández, Juan M Pericas, Pamela Doti, Ana Marušić |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/31eab59e7f4d4a6baffa663cc5685c0d |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
par: Elizabeth Wager
Publié: (2014) -
Computer-Based Patient Bias and Misconduct Training Impact on Reports to Incident Learning System
par: Caroline G. Wilker, MD, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Assisted Suicide in Switzerland: the Advent of a “Pattern for Misconduct”
par: Berthod Marc-Antoine, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Research Misconduct and Its Determinants in Accounting Research Environment
par: Mohammad Hossein Safarzadeh, et autres
Publié: (2016) -
Perceived ethical misconduct: a survey of neuropsychology professionals in Mexico
par: Paola Fonseca, et autres
Publié: (2016)