Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals.
<h4>Background</h4>It is not clear which research misconduct policies are adopted by biomedical journals. This study assessed the prevalence and content policies of the most influential biomedical journals on misconduct and procedures for handling and responding to allegations of miscond...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Xavier Bosch, Cristina Hernández, Juan M Pericas, Pamela Doti, Ana Marušić |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/31eab59e7f4d4a6baffa663cc5685c0d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
por: Elizabeth Wager
Publicado: (2014) -
Computer-Based Patient Bias and Misconduct Training Impact on Reports to Incident Learning System
por: Caroline G. Wilker, MD, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Assisted Suicide in Switzerland: the Advent of a “Pattern for Misconduct”
por: Berthod Marc-Antoine, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Research Misconduct and Its Determinants in Accounting Research Environment
por: Mohammad Hossein Safarzadeh, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Perceived ethical misconduct: a survey of neuropsychology professionals in Mexico
por: Paola Fonseca, et al.
Publicado: (2016)