Clinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform

Clinical peer review, a process mandated across all hospitals in the USA, originated as a measure to protect patients by ensuring a standardized level of medical service that is provided by all practicing physicians. The process involves retrospective chart reviewing to assess the quality of patient...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Husam Bader, Mohammad Abdulelah, Rama Maghnam, David Chin
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:	clinical peer review clinical bias policy improvement policy reform quality improvement Internal medicine RC31-1245
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/320ed6673d514a47bb81dd04ce4370a7
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:320ed6673d514a47bb81dd04ce4370a7
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:320ed6673d514a47bb81dd04ce4370a72021-11-17T14:21:57ZClinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform2000-966610.1080/20009666.2021.1965704https://doaj.org/article/320ed6673d514a47bb81dd04ce4370a72021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2021.1965704https://doaj.org/toc/2000-9666Clinical peer review, a process mandated across all hospitals in the USA, originated as a measure to protect patients by ensuring a standardized level of medical service that is provided by all practicing physicians. The process involves retrospective chart reviewing to assess the quality of patients’ care provided by physicians as well as adherence to the most appropriate guidelines. The process of clinical peer review almost entirely serves its ultimate purpose in quality preservation; However, certain laws gave immunity to reviewers resulting in abuse and using the clinical peer review process for secondary gain. Some notable cases of abuse were discussed in the article, we also shed light on two forms of bias that can potentially interfere with the review process and the dreaded outcomes that come along a negative peer review. We also propose methods to overcome these biases to further standardize and improve this crucial process.Husam BaderMohammad AbdulelahRama MaghnamDavid ChinTaylor & Francis Grouparticleclinical peer reviewclinical biaspolicy improvementpolicy reformquality improvementInternal medicineRC31-1245ENJournal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives, Vol 11, Iss 6, Pp 817-820 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	clinical peer review clinical bias policy improvement policy reform quality improvement Internal medicine RC31-1245
spellingShingle	clinical peer review clinical bias policy improvement policy reform quality improvement Internal medicine RC31-1245 Husam Bader Mohammad Abdulelah Rama Maghnam David Chin Clinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform
description	Clinical peer review, a process mandated across all hospitals in the USA, originated as a measure to protect patients by ensuring a standardized level of medical service that is provided by all practicing physicians. The process involves retrospective chart reviewing to assess the quality of patients’ care provided by physicians as well as adherence to the most appropriate guidelines. The process of clinical peer review almost entirely serves its ultimate purpose in quality preservation; However, certain laws gave immunity to reviewers resulting in abuse and using the clinical peer review process for secondary gain. Some notable cases of abuse were discussed in the article, we also shed light on two forms of bias that can potentially interfere with the review process and the dreaded outcomes that come along a negative peer review. We also propose methods to overcome these biases to further standardize and improve this crucial process.
format	article
author	Husam Bader Mohammad Abdulelah Rama Maghnam David Chin
author_facet	Husam Bader Mohammad Abdulelah Rama Maghnam David Chin
author_sort	Husam Bader
title	Clinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform
title_short	Clinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform
title_full	Clinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform
title_fullStr	Clinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform
title_full_unstemmed	Clinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform
title_sort	clinical peer review; a mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform
publisher	Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/320ed6673d514a47bb81dd04ce4370a7
work_keys_str_mv	AT husambader clinicalpeerreviewamandatoryprocesswithpotentialinherentbiasindesperateneedofreform AT mohammadabdulelah clinicalpeerreviewamandatoryprocesswithpotentialinherentbiasindesperateneedofreform AT ramamaghnam clinicalpeerreviewamandatoryprocesswithpotentialinherentbiasindesperateneedofreform AT davidchin clinicalpeerreviewamandatoryprocesswithpotentialinherentbiasindesperateneedofreform
_version_	1718425473552220160

Clinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform

Ejemplares similares