Ten Fast Transfer Learning Models for Carotid Ultrasound Plaque Tissue Characterization in Augmentation Framework Embedded with Heatmaps for Stroke Risk Stratification

<i>Background and Purpose:</i> Only 1–2% of the internal carotid artery asymptomatic plaques are unstable as a result of >80% stenosis. Thus, unnecessary efforts can be saved if these plaques can be characterized and classified into symptomatic and asymptomatic using non-invasive B-mo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skandha S. Sanagala, Andrew Nicolaides, Suneet K. Gupta, Vijaya K. Koppula, Luca Saba, Sushant Agarwal, Amer M. Johri, Manudeep S. Kalra, Jasjit S. Suri
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/328b577cc70340eaa8d8697fe1e80bbb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:328b577cc70340eaa8d8697fe1e80bbb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:328b577cc70340eaa8d8697fe1e80bbb2021-11-25T17:21:42ZTen Fast Transfer Learning Models for Carotid Ultrasound Plaque Tissue Characterization in Augmentation Framework Embedded with Heatmaps for Stroke Risk Stratification10.3390/diagnostics111121092075-4418https://doaj.org/article/328b577cc70340eaa8d8697fe1e80bbb2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/11/2109https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4418<i>Background and Purpose:</i> Only 1–2% of the internal carotid artery asymptomatic plaques are unstable as a result of >80% stenosis. Thus, unnecessary efforts can be saved if these plaques can be characterized and classified into symptomatic and asymptomatic using non-invasive B-mode ultrasound. Earlier plaque tissue characterization (PTC) methods were machine learning (ML)-based, which used hand-crafted features that yielded lower accuracy and unreliability. The proposed study shows the role of transfer learning (TL)-based deep learning models for PTC. <i>Methods:</i> As pertained weights were used in the supercomputer framework, we hypothesize that transfer learning (TL) provides improved performance compared with deep learning. We applied 11 kinds of artificial intelligence (AI) models, 10 of them were augmented and optimized using TL approaches—a class of Atheromatic™ 2.0 <sub>TL</sub> (AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA) that consisted of (<b>i–ii</b>) Visual Geometric Group-16, 19 (VGG16, 19); (<b>iii</b>) Inception V3 (IV3); (<b>iv–v</b>) DenseNet121, 169; (<b>vi</b>) XceptionNet; (<b>vii</b>) ResNet50; (<b>viii</b>) MobileNet; (<b>ix</b>) AlexNet; (<b>x</b>) SqueezeNet; and one DL-based (<b>xi</b>) SuriNet-derived from UNet. We benchmark 11 AI models against our earlier deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model. <i>Results:</i> The best performing TL was MobileNet, with accuracy and area-under-the-curve (AUC) pairs of 96.10 ± 3% and 0.961 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), respectively. In DL, DCNN was comparable to SuriNet, with an accuracy of 95.66% and 92.7 ± 5.66%, and an AUC of 0.956 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and 0.927 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), respectively. We validated the performance of the AI architectures with established biomarkers such as greyscale median (GSM), fractal dimension (FD), higher-order spectra (HOS), and visual heatmaps. We benchmarked against previously developed Atheromatic™ 1.0 <sub>ML</sub> and showed an improvement of <b>12.9</b>%. <i>Conclusions:</i> TL is a powerful AI tool for PTC into symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques.Skandha S. SanagalaAndrew NicolaidesSuneet K. GuptaVijaya K. KoppulaLuca SabaSushant AgarwalAmer M. JohriManudeep S. KalraJasjit S. SuriMDPI AGarticlestrokecarotid plaque characterizationsymptomatic vs. asymptomaticartificial intelligencetransfer learningheatmapsMedicine (General)R5-920ENDiagnostics, Vol 11, Iss 2109, p 2109 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic stroke
carotid plaque characterization
symptomatic vs. asymptomatic
artificial intelligence
transfer learning
heatmaps
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle stroke
carotid plaque characterization
symptomatic vs. asymptomatic
artificial intelligence
transfer learning
heatmaps
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Skandha S. Sanagala
Andrew Nicolaides
Suneet K. Gupta
Vijaya K. Koppula
Luca Saba
Sushant Agarwal
Amer M. Johri
Manudeep S. Kalra
Jasjit S. Suri
Ten Fast Transfer Learning Models for Carotid Ultrasound Plaque Tissue Characterization in Augmentation Framework Embedded with Heatmaps for Stroke Risk Stratification
description <i>Background and Purpose:</i> Only 1–2% of the internal carotid artery asymptomatic plaques are unstable as a result of >80% stenosis. Thus, unnecessary efforts can be saved if these plaques can be characterized and classified into symptomatic and asymptomatic using non-invasive B-mode ultrasound. Earlier plaque tissue characterization (PTC) methods were machine learning (ML)-based, which used hand-crafted features that yielded lower accuracy and unreliability. The proposed study shows the role of transfer learning (TL)-based deep learning models for PTC. <i>Methods:</i> As pertained weights were used in the supercomputer framework, we hypothesize that transfer learning (TL) provides improved performance compared with deep learning. We applied 11 kinds of artificial intelligence (AI) models, 10 of them were augmented and optimized using TL approaches—a class of Atheromatic™ 2.0 <sub>TL</sub> (AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA) that consisted of (<b>i–ii</b>) Visual Geometric Group-16, 19 (VGG16, 19); (<b>iii</b>) Inception V3 (IV3); (<b>iv–v</b>) DenseNet121, 169; (<b>vi</b>) XceptionNet; (<b>vii</b>) ResNet50; (<b>viii</b>) MobileNet; (<b>ix</b>) AlexNet; (<b>x</b>) SqueezeNet; and one DL-based (<b>xi</b>) SuriNet-derived from UNet. We benchmark 11 AI models against our earlier deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model. <i>Results:</i> The best performing TL was MobileNet, with accuracy and area-under-the-curve (AUC) pairs of 96.10 ± 3% and 0.961 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), respectively. In DL, DCNN was comparable to SuriNet, with an accuracy of 95.66% and 92.7 ± 5.66%, and an AUC of 0.956 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and 0.927 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), respectively. We validated the performance of the AI architectures with established biomarkers such as greyscale median (GSM), fractal dimension (FD), higher-order spectra (HOS), and visual heatmaps. We benchmarked against previously developed Atheromatic™ 1.0 <sub>ML</sub> and showed an improvement of <b>12.9</b>%. <i>Conclusions:</i> TL is a powerful AI tool for PTC into symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques.
format article
author Skandha S. Sanagala
Andrew Nicolaides
Suneet K. Gupta
Vijaya K. Koppula
Luca Saba
Sushant Agarwal
Amer M. Johri
Manudeep S. Kalra
Jasjit S. Suri
author_facet Skandha S. Sanagala
Andrew Nicolaides
Suneet K. Gupta
Vijaya K. Koppula
Luca Saba
Sushant Agarwal
Amer M. Johri
Manudeep S. Kalra
Jasjit S. Suri
author_sort Skandha S. Sanagala
title Ten Fast Transfer Learning Models for Carotid Ultrasound Plaque Tissue Characterization in Augmentation Framework Embedded with Heatmaps for Stroke Risk Stratification
title_short Ten Fast Transfer Learning Models for Carotid Ultrasound Plaque Tissue Characterization in Augmentation Framework Embedded with Heatmaps for Stroke Risk Stratification
title_full Ten Fast Transfer Learning Models for Carotid Ultrasound Plaque Tissue Characterization in Augmentation Framework Embedded with Heatmaps for Stroke Risk Stratification
title_fullStr Ten Fast Transfer Learning Models for Carotid Ultrasound Plaque Tissue Characterization in Augmentation Framework Embedded with Heatmaps for Stroke Risk Stratification
title_full_unstemmed Ten Fast Transfer Learning Models for Carotid Ultrasound Plaque Tissue Characterization in Augmentation Framework Embedded with Heatmaps for Stroke Risk Stratification
title_sort ten fast transfer learning models for carotid ultrasound plaque tissue characterization in augmentation framework embedded with heatmaps for stroke risk stratification
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/328b577cc70340eaa8d8697fe1e80bbb
work_keys_str_mv AT skandhassanagala tenfasttransferlearningmodelsforcarotidultrasoundplaquetissuecharacterizationinaugmentationframeworkembeddedwithheatmapsforstrokeriskstratification
AT andrewnicolaides tenfasttransferlearningmodelsforcarotidultrasoundplaquetissuecharacterizationinaugmentationframeworkembeddedwithheatmapsforstrokeriskstratification
AT suneetkgupta tenfasttransferlearningmodelsforcarotidultrasoundplaquetissuecharacterizationinaugmentationframeworkembeddedwithheatmapsforstrokeriskstratification
AT vijayakkoppula tenfasttransferlearningmodelsforcarotidultrasoundplaquetissuecharacterizationinaugmentationframeworkembeddedwithheatmapsforstrokeriskstratification
AT lucasaba tenfasttransferlearningmodelsforcarotidultrasoundplaquetissuecharacterizationinaugmentationframeworkembeddedwithheatmapsforstrokeriskstratification
AT sushantagarwal tenfasttransferlearningmodelsforcarotidultrasoundplaquetissuecharacterizationinaugmentationframeworkembeddedwithheatmapsforstrokeriskstratification
AT amermjohri tenfasttransferlearningmodelsforcarotidultrasoundplaquetissuecharacterizationinaugmentationframeworkembeddedwithheatmapsforstrokeriskstratification
AT manudeepskalra tenfasttransferlearningmodelsforcarotidultrasoundplaquetissuecharacterizationinaugmentationframeworkembeddedwithheatmapsforstrokeriskstratification
AT jasjitssuri tenfasttransferlearningmodelsforcarotidultrasoundplaquetissuecharacterizationinaugmentationframeworkembeddedwithheatmapsforstrokeriskstratification
_version_ 1718412461623738368