Open Science Indicators as Metadata Fields?

Since 2000, there has been qualitative growth in the field of scientometrics. Innovations such as the DOI and the ORCID have irrevocably changed the scientific landscape. They have enabled analyses previously unheard of, in the decades preceding the new millennium. This paper proposes open science i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chris Fradkin, Rogério Mugnaini
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Z
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/329df52537384f0a996dba1c74d46b70
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:329df52537384f0a996dba1c74d46b70
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:329df52537384f0a996dba1c74d46b702021-11-11T10:10:31ZOpen Science Indicators as Metadata Fields?2504-053710.3389/frma.2021.768428https://doaj.org/article/329df52537384f0a996dba1c74d46b702021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2021.768428/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2504-0537Since 2000, there has been qualitative growth in the field of scientometrics. Innovations such as the DOI and the ORCID have irrevocably changed the scientific landscape. They have enabled analyses previously unheard of, in the decades preceding the new millennium. This paper proposes open science indicators (open data, open material, preregistration) as article-specific metadata fields. The authors reference the history of funding information, from bare acknowledgements to metadata field. The authors describe the mission of the Center for Open Science, and its TOP Factor database, as well as the performance of open science badges. Possibilities for a pilot study are explored, with an acknowledgement of the complexity of this undertaking.Chris FradkinChris FradkinRogério MugnainiFrontiers Media S.A.articleopen scienceopen science badgesmetadatatransparencyscientific rigorBibliography. Library science. Information resourcesZENFrontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, Vol 6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic open science
open science badges
metadata
transparency
scientific rigor
Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
Z
spellingShingle open science
open science badges
metadata
transparency
scientific rigor
Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
Z
Chris Fradkin
Chris Fradkin
Rogério Mugnaini
Open Science Indicators as Metadata Fields?
description Since 2000, there has been qualitative growth in the field of scientometrics. Innovations such as the DOI and the ORCID have irrevocably changed the scientific landscape. They have enabled analyses previously unheard of, in the decades preceding the new millennium. This paper proposes open science indicators (open data, open material, preregistration) as article-specific metadata fields. The authors reference the history of funding information, from bare acknowledgements to metadata field. The authors describe the mission of the Center for Open Science, and its TOP Factor database, as well as the performance of open science badges. Possibilities for a pilot study are explored, with an acknowledgement of the complexity of this undertaking.
format article
author Chris Fradkin
Chris Fradkin
Rogério Mugnaini
author_facet Chris Fradkin
Chris Fradkin
Rogério Mugnaini
author_sort Chris Fradkin
title Open Science Indicators as Metadata Fields?
title_short Open Science Indicators as Metadata Fields?
title_full Open Science Indicators as Metadata Fields?
title_fullStr Open Science Indicators as Metadata Fields?
title_full_unstemmed Open Science Indicators as Metadata Fields?
title_sort open science indicators as metadata fields?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/329df52537384f0a996dba1c74d46b70
work_keys_str_mv AT chrisfradkin openscienceindicatorsasmetadatafields
AT chrisfradkin openscienceindicatorsasmetadatafields
AT rogeriomugnaini openscienceindicatorsasmetadatafields
_version_ 1718439202832515072