Efficiency of Protective Mask Filters in Removal of Hexavalent Chromium Mist

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Personal protective equipments (PPE) are common equipments for control of workers exposure to harmful agents in work environment. Regarding to the critical role of the filter collection efficiency under hazardous conditions such as exposure to carcinogen materials, this stu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: F Golbabaei, M Heidari, A Tirgar, A Rahimi Foroushani, SJ Shahtaheri
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FA
Publicado: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2012
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/32bbed2c82db4ac9bf823cd8500a5820
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:32bbed2c82db4ac9bf823cd8500a5820
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:32bbed2c82db4ac9bf823cd8500a58202021-11-10T08:53:26ZEfficiency of Protective Mask Filters in Removal of Hexavalent Chromium Mist1561-41072251-7170https://doaj.org/article/32bbed2c82db4ac9bf823cd8500a58202012-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jbums.org/article-1-4183-en.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1561-4107https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7170BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Personal protective equipments (PPE) are common equipments for control of workers exposure to harmful agents in work environment. Regarding to the critical role of the filter collection efficiency under hazardous conditions such as exposure to carcinogen materials, this study was performed to determine the effect of different factors on efficiency of respirator filters in removing hexavalent chromium mist. METHODS: In this quasi-experimental study, homogenous chromium mist at different conditions (concentration 1.25 and 2.5 mg/m3, relative humidity 50 and 80% , and temperature 0-5 and 35-40 oC) passed through two types of respirator filters (MSA and Spasciani). All samples (n= 384) were collected, using NIOSH 7600 test method at upstream and downstream of respiratory filters, simultaneously and analyzed, using an atomic absorption spectrometer and inductively coupled plasma (ICP), respectively. FINDINGS: Although type of filter had significant effect on hexavalent chromium mist removal, the ANOVA test results indicated that the increase of chromium mist concentration and relative humidity resulted a significant decrease in removal efficacy 0.53% and 0.42%, respectively (p<0.001). The temperature had not significant effect on filter efficiency.CONCLUSION: Increase of hexavalent chromium mist concentrations and relative humidity has significant negative effect on collection efficiency of respirator filters.F Golbabaei,M HeidariA TirgarA Rahimi Foroushani,SJ ShahtaheriBabol University of Medical Sciencesarticlehexavalent chromiummistrespiratorefficiencyfiltertemperaturerelative humidityconcentrationpenetrationMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENFAMajallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Bābul, Vol 14, Iss 5, Pp 77-83 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FA
topic hexavalent chromium
mist
respirator
efficiency
filter
temperature
relative humidity
concentration
penetration
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle hexavalent chromium
mist
respirator
efficiency
filter
temperature
relative humidity
concentration
penetration
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
F Golbabaei,
M Heidari
A Tirgar
A Rahimi Foroushani,
SJ Shahtaheri
Efficiency of Protective Mask Filters in Removal of Hexavalent Chromium Mist
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Personal protective equipments (PPE) are common equipments for control of workers exposure to harmful agents in work environment. Regarding to the critical role of the filter collection efficiency under hazardous conditions such as exposure to carcinogen materials, this study was performed to determine the effect of different factors on efficiency of respirator filters in removing hexavalent chromium mist. METHODS: In this quasi-experimental study, homogenous chromium mist at different conditions (concentration 1.25 and 2.5 mg/m3, relative humidity 50 and 80% , and temperature 0-5 and 35-40 oC) passed through two types of respirator filters (MSA and Spasciani). All samples (n= 384) were collected, using NIOSH 7600 test method at upstream and downstream of respiratory filters, simultaneously and analyzed, using an atomic absorption spectrometer and inductively coupled plasma (ICP), respectively. FINDINGS: Although type of filter had significant effect on hexavalent chromium mist removal, the ANOVA test results indicated that the increase of chromium mist concentration and relative humidity resulted a significant decrease in removal efficacy 0.53% and 0.42%, respectively (p<0.001). The temperature had not significant effect on filter efficiency.CONCLUSION: Increase of hexavalent chromium mist concentrations and relative humidity has significant negative effect on collection efficiency of respirator filters.
format article
author F Golbabaei,
M Heidari
A Tirgar
A Rahimi Foroushani,
SJ Shahtaheri
author_facet F Golbabaei,
M Heidari
A Tirgar
A Rahimi Foroushani,
SJ Shahtaheri
author_sort F Golbabaei,
title Efficiency of Protective Mask Filters in Removal of Hexavalent Chromium Mist
title_short Efficiency of Protective Mask Filters in Removal of Hexavalent Chromium Mist
title_full Efficiency of Protective Mask Filters in Removal of Hexavalent Chromium Mist
title_fullStr Efficiency of Protective Mask Filters in Removal of Hexavalent Chromium Mist
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of Protective Mask Filters in Removal of Hexavalent Chromium Mist
title_sort efficiency of protective mask filters in removal of hexavalent chromium mist
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/32bbed2c82db4ac9bf823cd8500a5820
work_keys_str_mv AT fgolbabaei efficiencyofprotectivemaskfiltersinremovalofhexavalentchromiummist
AT mheidari efficiencyofprotectivemaskfiltersinremovalofhexavalentchromiummist
AT atirgar efficiencyofprotectivemaskfiltersinremovalofhexavalentchromiummist
AT arahimiforoushani efficiencyofprotectivemaskfiltersinremovalofhexavalentchromiummist
AT sjshahtaheri efficiencyofprotectivemaskfiltersinremovalofhexavalentchromiummist
_version_ 1718440361310814208