An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation

Container-based sanitation (CBS) is increasingly used to provide safely managed sanitation in low-income urban settlements. However, questions remain around the viability of scaling up the technology, partly because it relies on regular emptying and servicing of containers by a CBS provider. This pa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charlie Ferguson, Adrian Mallory, Paul Hutchings, Claire Remington, Erica Lloyd, Domenic Kiogora, Fiona Anciano, Alison Parker
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: IWA Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/32bcf7e8408a4b99831f2504e5f62c2b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:32bcf7e8408a4b99831f2504e5f62c2b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:32bcf7e8408a4b99831f2504e5f62c2b2021-11-08T07:59:31ZAn evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation2616-651810.2166/h2oj.2021.112https://doaj.org/article/32bcf7e8408a4b99831f2504e5f62c2b2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2021.112https://doaj.org/toc/2616-6518Container-based sanitation (CBS) is increasingly used to provide safely managed sanitation in low-income urban settlements. However, questions remain around the viability of scaling up the technology, partly because it relies on regular emptying and servicing of containers by a CBS provider. This paper investigates mechanisms by which this process can be achieved efficiently. Three separate collection strategies are evaluated for their routing efficiencies as CBS goes to scale. An open-source route optimisation solver determines the constituent driving and walking distances necessary for each strategy and has been applied in areas of Cape Town, Cap-Haïtien, Lima and Nairobi. The results indicate that with fewer users (e.g. 50) transfer station models offer the shortest driving routes. However, these do require users to carry their containers (e.g. up to 170 m when stations are 100 m apart). As the number of users increases (e.g. to 5,000), visiting individual houses from a neighbourhood depot offers increasingly efficient driving distances. Overall, however, the results suggest that economies in collection distances for scaled CBS will be largely conditional on greater vehicle capacity (rather than any particular provision strategy). This highlights the importance of road access throughout low-income urban settlements in providing a viable CBS service at scale. HIGHLIGHTS Container-based sanitation is a form of road-based faecal sludge management.; Efficient routing of collection vehicles is critical for enabling scaled CBS.; This modelling evaluates three existing provision strategies using Google-OR tools.; Transfer stations and depots within neighbourhoods can reduce the required driving.; However, enlarged vehicle capacity offers greatest reductions in collection routing.;Charlie FergusonAdrian MalloryPaul HutchingsClaire RemingtonErica LloydDomenic KiogoraFiona AncianoAlison ParkerIWA Publishingarticlefaecal sludge managementroad networksroute optimisationurban sanitationwashRiver, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)TC401-506Water supply for domestic and industrial purposesTD201-500ENH2Open Journal, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 216-230 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic faecal sludge management
road networks
route optimisation
urban sanitation
wash
River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)
TC401-506
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
spellingShingle faecal sludge management
road networks
route optimisation
urban sanitation
wash
River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)
TC401-506
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
Charlie Ferguson
Adrian Mallory
Paul Hutchings
Claire Remington
Erica Lloyd
Domenic Kiogora
Fiona Anciano
Alison Parker
An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation
description Container-based sanitation (CBS) is increasingly used to provide safely managed sanitation in low-income urban settlements. However, questions remain around the viability of scaling up the technology, partly because it relies on regular emptying and servicing of containers by a CBS provider. This paper investigates mechanisms by which this process can be achieved efficiently. Three separate collection strategies are evaluated for their routing efficiencies as CBS goes to scale. An open-source route optimisation solver determines the constituent driving and walking distances necessary for each strategy and has been applied in areas of Cape Town, Cap-Haïtien, Lima and Nairobi. The results indicate that with fewer users (e.g. 50) transfer station models offer the shortest driving routes. However, these do require users to carry their containers (e.g. up to 170 m when stations are 100 m apart). As the number of users increases (e.g. to 5,000), visiting individual houses from a neighbourhood depot offers increasingly efficient driving distances. Overall, however, the results suggest that economies in collection distances for scaled CBS will be largely conditional on greater vehicle capacity (rather than any particular provision strategy). This highlights the importance of road access throughout low-income urban settlements in providing a viable CBS service at scale. HIGHLIGHTS Container-based sanitation is a form of road-based faecal sludge management.; Efficient routing of collection vehicles is critical for enabling scaled CBS.; This modelling evaluates three existing provision strategies using Google-OR tools.; Transfer stations and depots within neighbourhoods can reduce the required driving.; However, enlarged vehicle capacity offers greatest reductions in collection routing.;
format article
author Charlie Ferguson
Adrian Mallory
Paul Hutchings
Claire Remington
Erica Lloyd
Domenic Kiogora
Fiona Anciano
Alison Parker
author_facet Charlie Ferguson
Adrian Mallory
Paul Hutchings
Claire Remington
Erica Lloyd
Domenic Kiogora
Fiona Anciano
Alison Parker
author_sort Charlie Ferguson
title An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation
title_short An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation
title_full An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation
title_fullStr An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation
title_sort evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation
publisher IWA Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/32bcf7e8408a4b99831f2504e5f62c2b
work_keys_str_mv AT charlieferguson anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT adrianmallory anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT paulhutchings anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT claireremington anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT ericalloyd anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT domenickiogora anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT fionaanciano anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT alisonparker anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT charlieferguson evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT adrianmallory evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT paulhutchings evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT claireremington evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT ericalloyd evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT domenickiogora evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT fionaanciano evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
AT alisonparker evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation
_version_ 1718442794726457344