An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation
Container-based sanitation (CBS) is increasingly used to provide safely managed sanitation in low-income urban settlements. However, questions remain around the viability of scaling up the technology, partly because it relies on regular emptying and servicing of containers by a CBS provider. This pa...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
IWA Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/32bcf7e8408a4b99831f2504e5f62c2b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:32bcf7e8408a4b99831f2504e5f62c2b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:32bcf7e8408a4b99831f2504e5f62c2b2021-11-08T07:59:31ZAn evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation2616-651810.2166/h2oj.2021.112https://doaj.org/article/32bcf7e8408a4b99831f2504e5f62c2b2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2021.112https://doaj.org/toc/2616-6518Container-based sanitation (CBS) is increasingly used to provide safely managed sanitation in low-income urban settlements. However, questions remain around the viability of scaling up the technology, partly because it relies on regular emptying and servicing of containers by a CBS provider. This paper investigates mechanisms by which this process can be achieved efficiently. Three separate collection strategies are evaluated for their routing efficiencies as CBS goes to scale. An open-source route optimisation solver determines the constituent driving and walking distances necessary for each strategy and has been applied in areas of Cape Town, Cap-Haïtien, Lima and Nairobi. The results indicate that with fewer users (e.g. 50) transfer station models offer the shortest driving routes. However, these do require users to carry their containers (e.g. up to 170 m when stations are 100 m apart). As the number of users increases (e.g. to 5,000), visiting individual houses from a neighbourhood depot offers increasingly efficient driving distances. Overall, however, the results suggest that economies in collection distances for scaled CBS will be largely conditional on greater vehicle capacity (rather than any particular provision strategy). This highlights the importance of road access throughout low-income urban settlements in providing a viable CBS service at scale. HIGHLIGHTS Container-based sanitation is a form of road-based faecal sludge management.; Efficient routing of collection vehicles is critical for enabling scaled CBS.; This modelling evaluates three existing provision strategies using Google-OR tools.; Transfer stations and depots within neighbourhoods can reduce the required driving.; However, enlarged vehicle capacity offers greatest reductions in collection routing.;Charlie FergusonAdrian MalloryPaul HutchingsClaire RemingtonErica LloydDomenic KiogoraFiona AncianoAlison ParkerIWA Publishingarticlefaecal sludge managementroad networksroute optimisationurban sanitationwashRiver, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)TC401-506Water supply for domestic and industrial purposesTD201-500ENH2Open Journal, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 216-230 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
faecal sludge management road networks route optimisation urban sanitation wash River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) TC401-506 Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes TD201-500 |
spellingShingle |
faecal sludge management road networks route optimisation urban sanitation wash River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) TC401-506 Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes TD201-500 Charlie Ferguson Adrian Mallory Paul Hutchings Claire Remington Erica Lloyd Domenic Kiogora Fiona Anciano Alison Parker An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation |
description |
Container-based sanitation (CBS) is increasingly used to provide safely managed sanitation in low-income urban settlements. However, questions remain around the viability of scaling up the technology, partly because it relies on regular emptying and servicing of containers by a CBS provider. This paper investigates mechanisms by which this process can be achieved efficiently. Three separate collection strategies are evaluated for their routing efficiencies as CBS goes to scale. An open-source route optimisation solver determines the constituent driving and walking distances necessary for each strategy and has been applied in areas of Cape Town, Cap-Haïtien, Lima and Nairobi. The results indicate that with fewer users (e.g. 50) transfer station models offer the shortest driving routes. However, these do require users to carry their containers (e.g. up to 170 m when stations are 100 m apart). As the number of users increases (e.g. to 5,000), visiting individual houses from a neighbourhood depot offers increasingly efficient driving distances. Overall, however, the results suggest that economies in collection distances for scaled CBS will be largely conditional on greater vehicle capacity (rather than any particular provision strategy). This highlights the importance of road access throughout low-income urban settlements in providing a viable CBS service at scale. HIGHLIGHTS
Container-based sanitation is a form of road-based faecal sludge management.;
Efficient routing of collection vehicles is critical for enabling scaled CBS.;
This modelling evaluates three existing provision strategies using Google-OR tools.;
Transfer stations and depots within neighbourhoods can reduce the required driving.;
However, enlarged vehicle capacity offers greatest reductions in collection routing.; |
format |
article |
author |
Charlie Ferguson Adrian Mallory Paul Hutchings Claire Remington Erica Lloyd Domenic Kiogora Fiona Anciano Alison Parker |
author_facet |
Charlie Ferguson Adrian Mallory Paul Hutchings Claire Remington Erica Lloyd Domenic Kiogora Fiona Anciano Alison Parker |
author_sort |
Charlie Ferguson |
title |
An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation |
title_short |
An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation |
title_full |
An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation |
title_fullStr |
An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation |
title_full_unstemmed |
An evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation |
title_sort |
evaluation of different provision strategies for scaled-up container-based sanitation |
publisher |
IWA Publishing |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/32bcf7e8408a4b99831f2504e5f62c2b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT charlieferguson anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT adrianmallory anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT paulhutchings anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT claireremington anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT ericalloyd anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT domenickiogora anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT fionaanciano anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT alisonparker anevaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT charlieferguson evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT adrianmallory evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT paulhutchings evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT claireremington evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT ericalloyd evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT domenickiogora evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT fionaanciano evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation AT alisonparker evaluationofdifferentprovisionstrategiesforscaledupcontainerbasedsanitation |
_version_ |
1718442794726457344 |