A comparison of computational methods for identifying virulence factors.

Bacterial pathogens continue to threaten public health worldwide today. Identification of bacterial virulence factors can help to find novel drug/vaccine targets against pathogenicity. It can also help to reveal the mechanisms of the related diseases at the molecular level. With the explosive growth...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu-Lu Zheng, Yi-Xue Li, Juan Ding, Xiao-Kui Guo, Kai-Yan Feng, Ya-Jun Wang, Le-Le Hu, Yu-Dong Cai, Pei Hao, Kuo-Chen Chou
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/32f3339b8a80408e82ac0ccd21e0740f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:32f3339b8a80408e82ac0ccd21e0740f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:32f3339b8a80408e82ac0ccd21e0740f2021-11-18T07:09:44ZA comparison of computational methods for identifying virulence factors.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0042517https://doaj.org/article/32f3339b8a80408e82ac0ccd21e0740f2012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22880014/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Bacterial pathogens continue to threaten public health worldwide today. Identification of bacterial virulence factors can help to find novel drug/vaccine targets against pathogenicity. It can also help to reveal the mechanisms of the related diseases at the molecular level. With the explosive growth in protein sequences generated in the postgenomic age, it is highly desired to develop computational methods for rapidly and effectively identifying virulence factors according to their sequence information alone. In this study, based on the protein-protein interaction networks from the STRING database, a novel network-based method was proposed for identifying the virulence factors in the proteomes of UPEC 536, UPEC CFT073, P. aeruginosa PAO1, L. pneumophila Philadelphia 1, C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and M. tuberculosis H37Rv. Evaluated on the same benchmark datasets derived from the aforementioned species, the identification accuracies achieved by the network-based method were around 0.9, significantly higher than those by the sequence-based methods such as BLAST, feature selection and VirulentPred. Further analysis showed that the functional associations such as the gene neighborhood and co-occurrence were the primary associations between these virulence factors in the STRING database. The high success rates indicate that the network-based method is quite promising. The novel approach holds high potential for identifying virulence factors in many other various organisms as well because it can be easily extended to identify the virulence factors in many other bacterial species, as long as the relevant significant statistical data are available for them.Lu-Lu ZhengYi-Xue LiJuan DingXiao-Kui GuoKai-Yan FengYa-Jun WangLe-Le HuYu-Dong CaiPei HaoKuo-Chen ChouPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 8, p e42517 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Lu-Lu Zheng
Yi-Xue Li
Juan Ding
Xiao-Kui Guo
Kai-Yan Feng
Ya-Jun Wang
Le-Le Hu
Yu-Dong Cai
Pei Hao
Kuo-Chen Chou
A comparison of computational methods for identifying virulence factors.
description Bacterial pathogens continue to threaten public health worldwide today. Identification of bacterial virulence factors can help to find novel drug/vaccine targets against pathogenicity. It can also help to reveal the mechanisms of the related diseases at the molecular level. With the explosive growth in protein sequences generated in the postgenomic age, it is highly desired to develop computational methods for rapidly and effectively identifying virulence factors according to their sequence information alone. In this study, based on the protein-protein interaction networks from the STRING database, a novel network-based method was proposed for identifying the virulence factors in the proteomes of UPEC 536, UPEC CFT073, P. aeruginosa PAO1, L. pneumophila Philadelphia 1, C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and M. tuberculosis H37Rv. Evaluated on the same benchmark datasets derived from the aforementioned species, the identification accuracies achieved by the network-based method were around 0.9, significantly higher than those by the sequence-based methods such as BLAST, feature selection and VirulentPred. Further analysis showed that the functional associations such as the gene neighborhood and co-occurrence were the primary associations between these virulence factors in the STRING database. The high success rates indicate that the network-based method is quite promising. The novel approach holds high potential for identifying virulence factors in many other various organisms as well because it can be easily extended to identify the virulence factors in many other bacterial species, as long as the relevant significant statistical data are available for them.
format article
author Lu-Lu Zheng
Yi-Xue Li
Juan Ding
Xiao-Kui Guo
Kai-Yan Feng
Ya-Jun Wang
Le-Le Hu
Yu-Dong Cai
Pei Hao
Kuo-Chen Chou
author_facet Lu-Lu Zheng
Yi-Xue Li
Juan Ding
Xiao-Kui Guo
Kai-Yan Feng
Ya-Jun Wang
Le-Le Hu
Yu-Dong Cai
Pei Hao
Kuo-Chen Chou
author_sort Lu-Lu Zheng
title A comparison of computational methods for identifying virulence factors.
title_short A comparison of computational methods for identifying virulence factors.
title_full A comparison of computational methods for identifying virulence factors.
title_fullStr A comparison of computational methods for identifying virulence factors.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of computational methods for identifying virulence factors.
title_sort comparison of computational methods for identifying virulence factors.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/32f3339b8a80408e82ac0ccd21e0740f
work_keys_str_mv AT luluzheng acomparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT yixueli acomparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT juanding acomparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT xiaokuiguo acomparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT kaiyanfeng acomparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT yajunwang acomparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT lelehu acomparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT yudongcai acomparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT peihao acomparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT kuochenchou acomparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT luluzheng comparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT yixueli comparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT juanding comparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT xiaokuiguo comparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT kaiyanfeng comparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT yajunwang comparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT lelehu comparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT yudongcai comparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT peihao comparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
AT kuochenchou comparisonofcomputationalmethodsforidentifyingvirulencefactors
_version_ 1718423844194091008