Comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and anatomic landmark percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

<h4>Introduction</h4> Ultrasound-guided tracheostomy (UGT) and bronchoscope-guided tracheostomy (BGT) have been well compared. However, the differences in benefits between UGT and landmark tracheostomy (LT) have not been addressed and, in particular, lack a detailed meta-analysis. We aim...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kun-Te Lin, Yung-Shuo Kao, Chun-Wen Chiu, Chi-Hsien Lin, Chu-Chung Chou, Pei-You Hsieh, Yan-Ren Lin
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/32f6ba9aabc748fbb487486ba444bcc3
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:32f6ba9aabc748fbb487486ba444bcc3
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:32f6ba9aabc748fbb487486ba444bcc32021-11-04T06:49:38ZComparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and anatomic landmark percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis1932-6203https://doaj.org/article/32f6ba9aabc748fbb487486ba444bcc32021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553067/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Introduction</h4> Ultrasound-guided tracheostomy (UGT) and bronchoscope-guided tracheostomy (BGT) have been well compared. However, the differences in benefits between UGT and landmark tracheostomy (LT) have not been addressed and, in particular, lack a detailed meta-analysis. We aimed to compare the first-pass success, complication rate, major bleeding rate, and tracheostomy procedure time between UGT and LT. <h4>Methods</h4> In a systematic review, relevant databases were searched for studies comparing UGT with LT in intubated patients. The primary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) of first-pass success. The secondary outcomes were the OR of complications, OR of major bleeding, and standardized mean difference (SMD) of the total tracheostomy procedure time. <h4>Results</h4> The meta-analysis included three randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and one nonrandomized controlled study (NRS), comprising 474 patients in total. Compared with LT, UGT increased first-pass success (OR: 4.287; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.308 to 7.964) and decreased complications (OR: 0.422; 95% CI: 0.249 to 0.718). However, compared with LT, UGT did not significantly reduce major bleeding (OR: 0.374; 95% CI: 0.112 to 1.251) or the total tracheostomy placement time (SMD: -0.335; 95% CI: -0.842 to 0.172). <h4>Conclusions</h4> Compared with LT, real-time UGT increases first-pass success and decreases complications. However, UGT was not associated with a significant reduction in the major bleeding rate. The total tracheostomy placement time comparison between UGI and LT was inconclusive.Kun-Te LinYung-Shuo KaoChun-Wen ChiuChi-Hsien LinChu-Chung ChouPei-You HsiehYan-Ren LinPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Kun-Te Lin Yung-Shuo Kao Chun-Wen Chiu Chi-Hsien Lin Chu-Chung Chou Pei-You Hsieh Yan-Ren Lin Comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and anatomic landmark percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
description	<h4>Introduction</h4> Ultrasound-guided tracheostomy (UGT) and bronchoscope-guided tracheostomy (BGT) have been well compared. However, the differences in benefits between UGT and landmark tracheostomy (LT) have not been addressed and, in particular, lack a detailed meta-analysis. We aimed to compare the first-pass success, complication rate, major bleeding rate, and tracheostomy procedure time between UGT and LT. <h4>Methods</h4> In a systematic review, relevant databases were searched for studies comparing UGT with LT in intubated patients. The primary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) of first-pass success. The secondary outcomes were the OR of complications, OR of major bleeding, and standardized mean difference (SMD) of the total tracheostomy procedure time. <h4>Results</h4> The meta-analysis included three randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and one nonrandomized controlled study (NRS), comprising 474 patients in total. Compared with LT, UGT increased first-pass success (OR: 4.287; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.308 to 7.964) and decreased complications (OR: 0.422; 95% CI: 0.249 to 0.718). However, compared with LT, UGT did not significantly reduce major bleeding (OR: 0.374; 95% CI: 0.112 to 1.251) or the total tracheostomy placement time (SMD: -0.335; 95% CI: -0.842 to 0.172). <h4>Conclusions</h4> Compared with LT, real-time UGT increases first-pass success and decreases complications. However, UGT was not associated with a significant reduction in the major bleeding rate. The total tracheostomy placement time comparison between UGI and LT was inconclusive.
format	article
author	Kun-Te Lin Yung-Shuo Kao Chun-Wen Chiu Chi-Hsien Lin Chu-Chung Chou Pei-You Hsieh Yan-Ren Lin
author_facet	Kun-Te Lin Yung-Shuo Kao Chun-Wen Chiu Chi-Hsien Lin Chu-Chung Chou Pei-You Hsieh Yan-Ren Lin
author_sort	Kun-Te Lin
title	Comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and anatomic landmark percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short	Comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and anatomic landmark percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full	Comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and anatomic landmark percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr	Comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and anatomic landmark percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed	Comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and anatomic landmark percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort	comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and anatomic landmark percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/32f6ba9aabc748fbb487486ba444bcc3
work_keys_str_mv	AT kuntelin comparativeeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedandanatomiclandmarkpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yungshuokao comparativeeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedandanatomiclandmarkpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chunwenchiu comparativeeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedandanatomiclandmarkpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chihsienlin comparativeeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedandanatomiclandmarkpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chuchungchou comparativeeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedandanatomiclandmarkpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT peiyouhsieh comparativeeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedandanatomiclandmarkpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanrenlin comparativeeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedandanatomiclandmarkpercutaneousdilatationaltracheostomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_	1718445077372600320

Comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and anatomic landmark percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ejemplares similares