Comparison of Results from Life Cycle Assessment when Using Predicted and Real-life Data for an Anaerobic Digestion Plant

Increased separation of food waste driven by the European Circular Economy Action Plan will create a need for establishing new treatment plants that can turn waste resources into high value products. This paper presents a real example of how life cycle assessment was used as decision support when es...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kari-Anne Lyng, Ingunn S. Modahl, Hanne Møller, Simon Saxegård
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SDEWES Centre 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/330c984fc5fb49d48fd6bc3143b84abb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:330c984fc5fb49d48fd6bc3143b84abb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:330c984fc5fb49d48fd6bc3143b84abb2021-11-20T09:32:48ZComparison of Results from Life Cycle Assessment when Using Predicted and Real-life Data for an Anaerobic Digestion Plant1848-925710.13044/j.sdewes.d8.0373https://doaj.org/article/330c984fc5fb49d48fd6bc3143b84abb2021-09-01T00:00:00Z http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid8.0373 https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257Increased separation of food waste driven by the European Circular Economy Action Plan will create a need for establishing new treatment plants that can turn waste resources into high value products. This paper presents a real example of how life cycle assessment was used as decision support when establishing a new anaerobic digestion plant in Norway. The aim of the paper is to investigate the accuracy of the results of the predictive study performed before the plant was built by comparing them with results from the operation of the plant. The comparative assessment revealed that both the burdens and avoided emissions were underestimated. The production volume of upgraded biogas as a fuel for transport was higher than anticipated, resulting in a higher benefit than expected associated with substitution of diesel. Conversely, the impacts from transport and from the anaerobic digestion process were higher than forecasted. In total the net results from the predictive study were within an acceptable range compared with results based on real data.Kari-Anne LyngIngunn S. ModahlHanne MøllerSimon SaxegårdSDEWES Centrearticlebiowasteanaerobic digestionbiogasgreenhouse gas mitigationlife cycle assessmentTechnologyTEconomic growth, development, planningHD72-88ENJournal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, Vol 9, Iss 3, Pp 1-14 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic biowaste
anaerobic digestion
biogas
greenhouse gas mitigation
life cycle assessment
Technology
T
Economic growth, development, planning
HD72-88
spellingShingle biowaste
anaerobic digestion
biogas
greenhouse gas mitigation
life cycle assessment
Technology
T
Economic growth, development, planning
HD72-88
Kari-Anne Lyng
Ingunn S. Modahl
Hanne Møller
Simon Saxegård
Comparison of Results from Life Cycle Assessment when Using Predicted and Real-life Data for an Anaerobic Digestion Plant
description Increased separation of food waste driven by the European Circular Economy Action Plan will create a need for establishing new treatment plants that can turn waste resources into high value products. This paper presents a real example of how life cycle assessment was used as decision support when establishing a new anaerobic digestion plant in Norway. The aim of the paper is to investigate the accuracy of the results of the predictive study performed before the plant was built by comparing them with results from the operation of the plant. The comparative assessment revealed that both the burdens and avoided emissions were underestimated. The production volume of upgraded biogas as a fuel for transport was higher than anticipated, resulting in a higher benefit than expected associated with substitution of diesel. Conversely, the impacts from transport and from the anaerobic digestion process were higher than forecasted. In total the net results from the predictive study were within an acceptable range compared with results based on real data.
format article
author Kari-Anne Lyng
Ingunn S. Modahl
Hanne Møller
Simon Saxegård
author_facet Kari-Anne Lyng
Ingunn S. Modahl
Hanne Møller
Simon Saxegård
author_sort Kari-Anne Lyng
title Comparison of Results from Life Cycle Assessment when Using Predicted and Real-life Data for an Anaerobic Digestion Plant
title_short Comparison of Results from Life Cycle Assessment when Using Predicted and Real-life Data for an Anaerobic Digestion Plant
title_full Comparison of Results from Life Cycle Assessment when Using Predicted and Real-life Data for an Anaerobic Digestion Plant
title_fullStr Comparison of Results from Life Cycle Assessment when Using Predicted and Real-life Data for an Anaerobic Digestion Plant
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Results from Life Cycle Assessment when Using Predicted and Real-life Data for an Anaerobic Digestion Plant
title_sort comparison of results from life cycle assessment when using predicted and real-life data for an anaerobic digestion plant
publisher SDEWES Centre
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/330c984fc5fb49d48fd6bc3143b84abb
work_keys_str_mv AT kariannelyng comparisonofresultsfromlifecycleassessmentwhenusingpredictedandreallifedataforananaerobicdigestionplant
AT ingunnsmodahl comparisonofresultsfromlifecycleassessmentwhenusingpredictedandreallifedataforananaerobicdigestionplant
AT hannemøller comparisonofresultsfromlifecycleassessmentwhenusingpredictedandreallifedataforananaerobicdigestionplant
AT simonsaxegard comparisonofresultsfromlifecycleassessmentwhenusingpredictedandreallifedataforananaerobicdigestionplant
_version_ 1718419415456808960