Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials

Purpose: The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite. Methodology: Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials wer...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Fariha Naz, Abdul Samad Khan, Mohammed Abdul Kader, Lamis Omar Saad Al Gelban, Nada Mohammed Ali Mousa, Raghad Saeed Hader Asiri, Abbas Saeed Hakeem
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Elsevier 2021
Materias:	Cention N Glass ionomer cement Nano-hybrid composite Shear bond strength Surface roughness Medicine R Dentistry RK1-715
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/339584e172044e568bac7d2e47902d1c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:339584e172044e568bac7d2e47902d1c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:339584e172044e568bac7d2e47902d1c2021-11-10T04:18:16ZComparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials1013-905210.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012https://doaj.org/article/339584e172044e568bac7d2e47902d1c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905219311915https://doaj.org/toc/1013-9052Purpose: The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite. Methodology: Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials were placed on the dentine surface and were aged in deionized water for 14 days. The 3-D surface roughness was evaluated before and after chewing simulation cycles (50,000). The samples were fatigued mechanically using a chewing simulator and investigated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: For shear bond strength, alkasite showed significantly high values than GIC, whereas non-significant difference was observed between alkasite and nano-hybrid composite. After the chewing simulation (50,000 cycles), non-significant difference was found between GIC and nano-hybrid composite, where surface roughness values were highest for GIC and lowest for alkasite. Conclusion: The newly developed restorative material (alkasite) has shown better results than existing restorative materials.Fariha NazAbdul Samad KhanMohammed Abdul KaderLamis Omar Saad Al GelbanNada Mohammed Ali MousaRaghad Saeed Hader AsiriAbbas Saeed HakeemElsevierarticleCention NGlass ionomer cementNano-hybrid compositeShear bond strengthSurface roughnessMedicineRDentistryRK1-715ENSaudi Dental Journal, Vol 33, Iss 7, Pp 666-673 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Cention N Glass ionomer cement Nano-hybrid composite Shear bond strength Surface roughness Medicine R Dentistry RK1-715
spellingShingle	Cention N Glass ionomer cement Nano-hybrid composite Shear bond strength Surface roughness Medicine R Dentistry RK1-715 Fariha Naz Abdul Samad Khan Mohammed Abdul Kader Lamis Omar Saad Al Gelban Nada Mohammed Ali Mousa Raghad Saeed Hader Asiri Abbas Saeed Hakeem Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
description	Purpose: The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite. Methodology: Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials were placed on the dentine surface and were aged in deionized water for 14 days. The 3-D surface roughness was evaluated before and after chewing simulation cycles (50,000). The samples were fatigued mechanically using a chewing simulator and investigated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: For shear bond strength, alkasite showed significantly high values than GIC, whereas non-significant difference was observed between alkasite and nano-hybrid composite. After the chewing simulation (50,000 cycles), non-significant difference was found between GIC and nano-hybrid composite, where surface roughness values were highest for GIC and lowest for alkasite. Conclusion: The newly developed restorative material (alkasite) has shown better results than existing restorative materials.
format	article
author	Fariha Naz Abdul Samad Khan Mohammed Abdul Kader Lamis Omar Saad Al Gelban Nada Mohammed Ali Mousa Raghad Saeed Hader Asiri Abbas Saeed Hakeem
author_facet	Fariha Naz Abdul Samad Khan Mohammed Abdul Kader Lamis Omar Saad Al Gelban Nada Mohammed Ali Mousa Raghad Saeed Hader Asiri Abbas Saeed Hakeem
author_sort	Fariha Naz
title	Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
title_short	Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
title_full	Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
title_fullStr	Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
title_full_unstemmed	Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
title_sort	comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
publisher	Elsevier
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/339584e172044e568bac7d2e47902d1c
work_keys_str_mv	AT farihanaz comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials AT abdulsamadkhan comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials AT mohammedabdulkader comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials AT lamisomarsaadalgelban comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials AT nadamohammedalimousa comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials AT raghadsaeedhaderasiri comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials AT abbassaeedhakeem comparativeevaluationofmechanicalandphysicalpropertiesofanewbulkfillalkasitewithconventionalrestorativematerials
_version_	1718440637954523136

Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials

Ejemplares similares