Comparison of a New Video Intubation Stylet and McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope for Intubation in an Airway Manikin with Normal Airway and Cervical Spine Immobilization Scenarios by Novice Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study

The use of both a video laryngoscope and a video intubation stylet, compared with the use of a direct laryngoscope, is not only easier to learn but also associated with a higher success rate in performing endotracheal intubation for novice users. However, data comparing the two video devices used by...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin-Woo Park, Sungmin An, Seongjoo Park, Francis Sahngun Nahm, Sung-Hee Han, Jin-Hee Kim
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Hindawi Limited 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/33cf508e83514c81b1b24e42efba818b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:33cf508e83514c81b1b24e42efba818b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:33cf508e83514c81b1b24e42efba818b2021-11-22T01:10:04ZComparison of a New Video Intubation Stylet and McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope for Intubation in an Airway Manikin with Normal Airway and Cervical Spine Immobilization Scenarios by Novice Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study2314-614110.1155/2021/4288367https://doaj.org/article/33cf508e83514c81b1b24e42efba818b2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4288367https://doaj.org/toc/2314-6141The use of both a video laryngoscope and a video intubation stylet, compared with the use of a direct laryngoscope, is not only easier to learn but also associated with a higher success rate in performing endotracheal intubation for novice users. However, data comparing the two video devices used by novice personnel are rarely found in literature. Nondelayed intubation is an important condition to determine the prognosis in critically ill patients; hence, exploring intubation performance in various situations is of clinical significance. This study is aimed at comparing a video stylet and a video laryngoscope for intubation in an airway manikin with normal airway and cervical spine immobilization scenarios by novice personnel. We compared the performance of intubation by novices between the Aram Video Stylet and the McGrath® MAC video laryngoscope in an airway manikin. Thirty medical doctors with minimal experience of endotracheal intubation attempted intubation on a manikin five times with each device in each setting (normal airway and cervical spine immobilization scenarios). The order of use of the devices in each scenario was randomized for each participant. In the normal airway scenario, the Aram stylet showed a significantly higher rate of successful intubation than the McGrath® (98.7% vs. 92.0%; odds ratio (95% CI): 6.4 (1.4–29.3); p=0.006). The intubation time was shorter using the Aram Stylet than that using the McGrath® video laryngoscope (p<0.001). In the cervical immobilization scenario, successful endotracheal intubation was also more frequent using the Aram stylet than with the McGrath® (96.0% vs. 87.3%; odds ratio (95% CI): 3.5 (1.3–9.0); p=0.007). The Aram Stylet intubation time was shorter (p<0.001). In novice personnel, endotracheal intubation appears to be more successful and faster using the Aram Video Stylet than the McGrath® MAC video laryngoscope.Jin-Woo ParkSungmin AnSeongjoo ParkFrancis Sahngun NahmSung-Hee HanJin-Hee KimHindawi LimitedarticleMedicineRENBioMed Research International, Vol 2021 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Jin-Woo Park
Sungmin An
Seongjoo Park
Francis Sahngun Nahm
Sung-Hee Han
Jin-Hee Kim
Comparison of a New Video Intubation Stylet and McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope for Intubation in an Airway Manikin with Normal Airway and Cervical Spine Immobilization Scenarios by Novice Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study
description The use of both a video laryngoscope and a video intubation stylet, compared with the use of a direct laryngoscope, is not only easier to learn but also associated with a higher success rate in performing endotracheal intubation for novice users. However, data comparing the two video devices used by novice personnel are rarely found in literature. Nondelayed intubation is an important condition to determine the prognosis in critically ill patients; hence, exploring intubation performance in various situations is of clinical significance. This study is aimed at comparing a video stylet and a video laryngoscope for intubation in an airway manikin with normal airway and cervical spine immobilization scenarios by novice personnel. We compared the performance of intubation by novices between the Aram Video Stylet and the McGrath® MAC video laryngoscope in an airway manikin. Thirty medical doctors with minimal experience of endotracheal intubation attempted intubation on a manikin five times with each device in each setting (normal airway and cervical spine immobilization scenarios). The order of use of the devices in each scenario was randomized for each participant. In the normal airway scenario, the Aram stylet showed a significantly higher rate of successful intubation than the McGrath® (98.7% vs. 92.0%; odds ratio (95% CI): 6.4 (1.4–29.3); p=0.006). The intubation time was shorter using the Aram Stylet than that using the McGrath® video laryngoscope (p<0.001). In the cervical immobilization scenario, successful endotracheal intubation was also more frequent using the Aram stylet than with the McGrath® (96.0% vs. 87.3%; odds ratio (95% CI): 3.5 (1.3–9.0); p=0.007). The Aram Stylet intubation time was shorter (p<0.001). In novice personnel, endotracheal intubation appears to be more successful and faster using the Aram Video Stylet than the McGrath® MAC video laryngoscope.
format article
author Jin-Woo Park
Sungmin An
Seongjoo Park
Francis Sahngun Nahm
Sung-Hee Han
Jin-Hee Kim
author_facet Jin-Woo Park
Sungmin An
Seongjoo Park
Francis Sahngun Nahm
Sung-Hee Han
Jin-Hee Kim
author_sort Jin-Woo Park
title Comparison of a New Video Intubation Stylet and McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope for Intubation in an Airway Manikin with Normal Airway and Cervical Spine Immobilization Scenarios by Novice Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_short Comparison of a New Video Intubation Stylet and McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope for Intubation in an Airway Manikin with Normal Airway and Cervical Spine Immobilization Scenarios by Novice Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_full Comparison of a New Video Intubation Stylet and McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope for Intubation in an Airway Manikin with Normal Airway and Cervical Spine Immobilization Scenarios by Novice Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_fullStr Comparison of a New Video Intubation Stylet and McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope for Intubation in an Airway Manikin with Normal Airway and Cervical Spine Immobilization Scenarios by Novice Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a New Video Intubation Stylet and McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope for Intubation in an Airway Manikin with Normal Airway and Cervical Spine Immobilization Scenarios by Novice Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_sort comparison of a new video intubation stylet and mcgrath® mac video laryngoscope for intubation in an airway manikin with normal airway and cervical spine immobilization scenarios by novice personnel: a randomized crossover study
publisher Hindawi Limited
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/33cf508e83514c81b1b24e42efba818b
work_keys_str_mv AT jinwoopark comparisonofanewvideointubationstyletandmcgrathmacvideolaryngoscopeforintubationinanairwaymanikinwithnormalairwayandcervicalspineimmobilizationscenariosbynovicepersonnelarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT sungminan comparisonofanewvideointubationstyletandmcgrathmacvideolaryngoscopeforintubationinanairwaymanikinwithnormalairwayandcervicalspineimmobilizationscenariosbynovicepersonnelarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT seongjoopark comparisonofanewvideointubationstyletandmcgrathmacvideolaryngoscopeforintubationinanairwaymanikinwithnormalairwayandcervicalspineimmobilizationscenariosbynovicepersonnelarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT francissahngunnahm comparisonofanewvideointubationstyletandmcgrathmacvideolaryngoscopeforintubationinanairwaymanikinwithnormalairwayandcervicalspineimmobilizationscenariosbynovicepersonnelarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT sungheehan comparisonofanewvideointubationstyletandmcgrathmacvideolaryngoscopeforintubationinanairwaymanikinwithnormalairwayandcervicalspineimmobilizationscenariosbynovicepersonnelarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT jinheekim comparisonofanewvideointubationstyletandmcgrathmacvideolaryngoscopeforintubationinanairwaymanikinwithnormalairwayandcervicalspineimmobilizationscenariosbynovicepersonnelarandomizedcrossoverstudy
_version_ 1718418391065165824