Use of a Portable Inertial Measurement Unit as an Evaluation Method for Supraspinatus Muscle: Proposed Normative Values

Treatment protocols do not specify an appropriate weight for rehabilitating the shoulder joint. The purpose of this study was to establish normative values for the shoulder abduction range of motion and recommended weights to be used in the rehabilitation process after injury to the supraspinatus mu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Sagrario Pérez-de la Cruz
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	rehabilitation range of motion shoulder Chemical technology TP1-1185
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/33d3737cb61749ca8847fdb1d81fece7
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:33d3737cb61749ca8847fdb1d81fece7
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:33d3737cb61749ca8847fdb1d81fece72021-11-25T18:58:47ZUse of a Portable Inertial Measurement Unit as an Evaluation Method for Supraspinatus Muscle: Proposed Normative Values10.3390/s212277231424-8220https://doaj.org/article/33d3737cb61749ca8847fdb1d81fece72021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/22/7723https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220Treatment protocols do not specify an appropriate weight for rehabilitating the shoulder joint. The purpose of this study was to establish normative values for the shoulder abduction range of motion and recommended weights to be used in the rehabilitation process after injury to the supraspinatus muscle. Fifty-eight volunteers were assessed using the DyCare system. A test was conducted by lifting the arm to a 90° angle and having the participants lift different weights. The range of motion was similar for both sexes, suggesting that sex had no influence on this variable. Regarding the use of weights, men did not show as much stability in their movement execution, with a high dispersion seen in values between zero and three kilograms of weight, reaching a maximum weight of six kilograms. However, women showed good joint stability from the beginning of the test, with values that remained constant as weight increased up to a maximum of five kilograms. In conclusion, no major differences were observed in supraspinatus muscle injury recovery according to sex. However, differences were observed in the amount of weight that was necessary and appropriate to allow the participants to recover their muscular strength and avoid relapses.Sagrario Pérez-de la CruzMDPI AGarticlerehabilitationrange of motionshoulderChemical technologyTP1-1185ENSensors, Vol 21, Iss 7723, p 7723 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	rehabilitation range of motion shoulder Chemical technology TP1-1185
spellingShingle	rehabilitation range of motion shoulder Chemical technology TP1-1185 Sagrario Pérez-de la Cruz Use of a Portable Inertial Measurement Unit as an Evaluation Method for Supraspinatus Muscle: Proposed Normative Values
description	Treatment protocols do not specify an appropriate weight for rehabilitating the shoulder joint. The purpose of this study was to establish normative values for the shoulder abduction range of motion and recommended weights to be used in the rehabilitation process after injury to the supraspinatus muscle. Fifty-eight volunteers were assessed using the DyCare system. A test was conducted by lifting the arm to a 90° angle and having the participants lift different weights. The range of motion was similar for both sexes, suggesting that sex had no influence on this variable. Regarding the use of weights, men did not show as much stability in their movement execution, with a high dispersion seen in values between zero and three kilograms of weight, reaching a maximum weight of six kilograms. However, women showed good joint stability from the beginning of the test, with values that remained constant as weight increased up to a maximum of five kilograms. In conclusion, no major differences were observed in supraspinatus muscle injury recovery according to sex. However, differences were observed in the amount of weight that was necessary and appropriate to allow the participants to recover their muscular strength and avoid relapses.
format	article
author	Sagrario Pérez-de la Cruz
author_facet	Sagrario Pérez-de la Cruz
author_sort	Sagrario Pérez-de la Cruz
title	Use of a Portable Inertial Measurement Unit as an Evaluation Method for Supraspinatus Muscle: Proposed Normative Values
title_short	Use of a Portable Inertial Measurement Unit as an Evaluation Method for Supraspinatus Muscle: Proposed Normative Values
title_full	Use of a Portable Inertial Measurement Unit as an Evaluation Method for Supraspinatus Muscle: Proposed Normative Values
title_fullStr	Use of a Portable Inertial Measurement Unit as an Evaluation Method for Supraspinatus Muscle: Proposed Normative Values
title_full_unstemmed	Use of a Portable Inertial Measurement Unit as an Evaluation Method for Supraspinatus Muscle: Proposed Normative Values
title_sort	use of a portable inertial measurement unit as an evaluation method for supraspinatus muscle: proposed normative values
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/33d3737cb61749ca8847fdb1d81fece7
work_keys_str_mv	AT sagrarioperezdelacruz useofaportableinertialmeasurementunitasanevaluationmethodforsupraspinatusmuscleproposednormativevalues
_version_	1718410455116939264

Use of a Portable Inertial Measurement Unit as an Evaluation Method for Supraspinatus Muscle: Proposed Normative Values

Ejemplares similares