Contrasting Epistemics
Rationale and Context The idea of a Contrasting Episteme, as it is conceived in a series of essays on this theme: is suggested as an approach to grounding the matrix of inquiry in the social sciences in a new spatial zone of conceptual affinities. By carrying the debate in the disciplines to its ep...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
1990
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/33dcdc30f1d2429aa19d3f243f915549 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:33dcdc30f1d2429aa19d3f243f915549 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:33dcdc30f1d2429aa19d3f243f9155492021-12-02T19:40:17ZContrasting Epistemics10.35632/ajis.v7i1.26652690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/33dcdc30f1d2429aa19d3f243f9155491990-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/2665https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 Rationale and Context The idea of a Contrasting Episteme, as it is conceived in a series of essays on this theme: is suggested as an approach to grounding the matrix of inquiry in the social sciences in a new spatial zone of conceptual affinities. By carrying the debate in the disciplines to its epistemic foundations, and by conceding the possibility of divergences within these foundations along the lines of basic types, it becomes possible to postulate alternative valid conceptions of social science compatible with different intellectual traditions of inquiry. In the field of the Islamization of knowledge, a critical awareness of such alternatives is all the more necessary for partisans and skeptics alike. Given the critical reconstructionist orientation of that movement it is important to know what it finds objectionable in a given system of knowledge (and its products), and on what basis it justifies its claims to an alternative system, as well as to define the contours of such an alternative. The claim that the prevailing intellectual tradition which conditions the various disciplines of social and humanistic studies is anaemic in values, or that it is contested simply in terms of value-incompatibility, is too facile to justify a movement for cultural reconstruction on the scale envisaged. It leads to the naive contentions that all that Islamization requires is to add a dose of Islamic values (which ultimately constitute a universal and general ... Mona Abul-FadlInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 7, Iss 1 (1990) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Islam BP1-253 |
| spellingShingle |
Islam BP1-253 Mona Abul-Fadl Contrasting Epistemics |
| description |
Rationale and Context
The idea of a Contrasting Episteme, as it is conceived in a series of
essays on this theme: is suggested as an approach to grounding the matrix
of inquiry in the social sciences in a new spatial zone of conceptual affinities.
By carrying the debate in the disciplines to its epistemic foundations, and
by conceding the possibility of divergences within these foundations along
the lines of basic types, it becomes possible to postulate alternative valid
conceptions of social science compatible with different intellectual traditions
of inquiry. In the field of the Islamization of knowledge, a critical awareness
of such alternatives is all the more necessary for partisans and skeptics alike.
Given the critical reconstructionist orientation of that movement it is important
to know what it finds objectionable in a given system of knowledge (and
its products), and on what basis it justifies its claims to an alternative system,
as well as to define the contours of such an alternative.
The claim that the prevailing intellectual tradition which conditions the
various disciplines of social and humanistic studies is anaemic in values,
or that it is contested simply in terms of value-incompatibility, is too facile
to justify a movement for cultural reconstruction on the scale envisaged. It
leads to the naive contentions that all that Islamization requires is to add
a dose of Islamic values (which ultimately constitute a universal and general ...
|
| format |
article |
| author |
Mona Abul-Fadl |
| author_facet |
Mona Abul-Fadl |
| author_sort |
Mona Abul-Fadl |
| title |
Contrasting Epistemics |
| title_short |
Contrasting Epistemics |
| title_full |
Contrasting Epistemics |
| title_fullStr |
Contrasting Epistemics |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Contrasting Epistemics |
| title_sort |
contrasting epistemics |
| publisher |
International Institute of Islamic Thought |
| publishDate |
1990 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/33dcdc30f1d2429aa19d3f243f915549 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT monaabulfadl contrastingepistemics |
| _version_ |
1718376193988755456 |