EVALUATION OF THIN FILM COMPOSITE FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANES: EFFECT OF POLYMER TYPE

In the forward osmosis (FO) processes, the semipermeable membranes are used. These membranes are prepared from several types of polymers. In this research, the characterizations of each polymer were studied to conversance the effect of polymer type on the efficiency of the forward osmosis process. T...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Aya M. Kadhum, Mustafa H. Al-Furaiji, Zaidun N. Abudi
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	AR EN
Publicado:	Mustansiriyah University/College of Engineering 2021
Materias:	forward-osmosis polyethersulfone polysulfone polyacrylonitrile interfacial polymerization poly-amide. Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/33ece63a725544c2a239a9a414314e37
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:33ece63a725544c2a239a9a414314e37
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:33ece63a725544c2a239a9a414314e372021-11-10T10:41:07ZEVALUATION OF THIN FILM COMPOSITE FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANES: EFFECT OF POLYMER TYPE10.31272/jeasd.25.6.72520-09172520-0925https://doaj.org/article/33ece63a725544c2a239a9a414314e372021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/3e06b97ba2abaaeehttps://doaj.org/toc/2520-0917https://doaj.org/toc/2520-0925In the forward osmosis (FO) processes, the semipermeable membranes are used. These membranes are prepared from several types of polymers. In this research, the characterizations of each polymer were studied to conversance the effect of polymer type on the efficiency of the forward osmosis process. The prepared membrane’s roughness was investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to compare the formation of the TFC polyamide selective layer on each polymer type. Also, SEM images showed the distribution of pores on the prepared membrane. Contact angle (CA) measurements explained the hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties of membrane types. Finally, Energy dispersion spectrometry (EDS) was tested to determine the type, amount, and distribution of atoms in the prepared membranes. All of these characterizations proved that the Polysulfone (PSU) polymer was the best choice in the FO process. It can be proved that by test results, the PSU membrane gave the optimal water flux and salt rejection.Aya M. KadhumMustafa H. Al-FuraijiZaidun N. AbudiMustansiriyah University/College of Engineeringarticleforward-osmosispolyethersulfonepolysulfonepolyacrylonitrileinterfacial polymerizationpoly-amide.Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ARENJournal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Vol 25, Iss 6, Pp 65-73 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	AR EN
topic	forward-osmosis polyethersulfone polysulfone polyacrylonitrile interfacial polymerization poly-amide. Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040
spellingShingle	forward-osmosis polyethersulfone polysulfone polyacrylonitrile interfacial polymerization poly-amide. Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Aya M. Kadhum Mustafa H. Al-Furaiji Zaidun N. Abudi EVALUATION OF THIN FILM COMPOSITE FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANES: EFFECT OF POLYMER TYPE
description	In the forward osmosis (FO) processes, the semipermeable membranes are used. These membranes are prepared from several types of polymers. In this research, the characterizations of each polymer were studied to conversance the effect of polymer type on the efficiency of the forward osmosis process. The prepared membrane’s roughness was investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to compare the formation of the TFC polyamide selective layer on each polymer type. Also, SEM images showed the distribution of pores on the prepared membrane. Contact angle (CA) measurements explained the hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties of membrane types. Finally, Energy dispersion spectrometry (EDS) was tested to determine the type, amount, and distribution of atoms in the prepared membranes. All of these characterizations proved that the Polysulfone (PSU) polymer was the best choice in the FO process. It can be proved that by test results, the PSU membrane gave the optimal water flux and salt rejection.
format	article
author	Aya M. Kadhum Mustafa H. Al-Furaiji Zaidun N. Abudi
author_facet	Aya M. Kadhum Mustafa H. Al-Furaiji Zaidun N. Abudi
author_sort	Aya M. Kadhum
title	EVALUATION OF THIN FILM COMPOSITE FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANES: EFFECT OF POLYMER TYPE
title_short	EVALUATION OF THIN FILM COMPOSITE FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANES: EFFECT OF POLYMER TYPE
title_full	EVALUATION OF THIN FILM COMPOSITE FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANES: EFFECT OF POLYMER TYPE
title_fullStr	EVALUATION OF THIN FILM COMPOSITE FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANES: EFFECT OF POLYMER TYPE
title_full_unstemmed	EVALUATION OF THIN FILM COMPOSITE FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANES: EFFECT OF POLYMER TYPE
title_sort	evaluation of thin film composite forward osmosis membranes: effect of polymer type
publisher	Mustansiriyah University/College of Engineering
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/33ece63a725544c2a239a9a414314e37
work_keys_str_mv	AT ayamkadhum evaluationofthinfilmcompositeforwardosmosismembraneseffectofpolymertype AT mustafahalfuraiji evaluationofthinfilmcompositeforwardosmosismembraneseffectofpolymertype AT zaidunnabudi evaluationofthinfilmcompositeforwardosmosismembraneseffectofpolymertype
_version_	1718439970449915904

EVALUATION OF THIN FILM COMPOSITE FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANES: EFFECT OF POLYMER TYPE

Ejemplares similares