Analysis of resource allocation and PM2.5 pollution control efficiency: Evidence from 112 Chinese cities
The State Council of China initiated an air pollution prevention and control key (APPCK) city program to drive the national economic development and air pollution control since 2003. However, little known about whether the initiation is efficient. This paper examined the PM2.5 pollution control effi...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3405e29e19f54579a403b1af63aa6e0c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:3405e29e19f54579a403b1af63aa6e0c |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:3405e29e19f54579a403b1af63aa6e0c2021-12-01T04:51:45ZAnalysis of resource allocation and PM2.5 pollution control efficiency: Evidence from 112 Chinese cities1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107705https://doaj.org/article/3405e29e19f54579a403b1af63aa6e0c2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21003708https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XThe State Council of China initiated an air pollution prevention and control key (APPCK) city program to drive the national economic development and air pollution control since 2003. However, little known about whether the initiation is efficient. This paper examined the PM2.5 pollution control efficiency (PPCE) of 112 Chinese APPCK cities in 2003–2017 using Super-slack-based measure (Super-SBM) model with undesirable outputs. Results show that: (1) PPCEs of coastal cities (e.g., Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Suzhou) are much higher than those of less-developed northern cities (e.g., Jiaozuo, Anyang and Kaifeng); (2) the overall PPCE of 112 APPCK cities is relatively low and improvable; (3) the annual average growth rate of global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index is 6.3%; (4) the technological progress is a significant contributor to improve the PPCE of these cities with 3.1% global technological change. These results provide reference to not only the policy-makers of China for synergies and tradeoffs between economic development and PM2.5 pollution control but also the studies on PM2.5 pollution control efficiency in the international context.Yu ZhangXi ChenYanying MaoChenyang ShuaiLiudan JiaoYa WuElsevierarticlePM2.5 pollutionSuper-SBM modelGlobal Malmquist-Luenberger productivity indexChinese citiesEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 127, Iss , Pp 107705- (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
PM2.5 pollution Super-SBM model Global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index Chinese cities Ecology QH540-549.5 |
spellingShingle |
PM2.5 pollution Super-SBM model Global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index Chinese cities Ecology QH540-549.5 Yu Zhang Xi Chen Yanying Mao Chenyang Shuai Liudan Jiao Ya Wu Analysis of resource allocation and PM2.5 pollution control efficiency: Evidence from 112 Chinese cities |
description |
The State Council of China initiated an air pollution prevention and control key (APPCK) city program to drive the national economic development and air pollution control since 2003. However, little known about whether the initiation is efficient. This paper examined the PM2.5 pollution control efficiency (PPCE) of 112 Chinese APPCK cities in 2003–2017 using Super-slack-based measure (Super-SBM) model with undesirable outputs. Results show that: (1) PPCEs of coastal cities (e.g., Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Suzhou) are much higher than those of less-developed northern cities (e.g., Jiaozuo, Anyang and Kaifeng); (2) the overall PPCE of 112 APPCK cities is relatively low and improvable; (3) the annual average growth rate of global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index is 6.3%; (4) the technological progress is a significant contributor to improve the PPCE of these cities with 3.1% global technological change. These results provide reference to not only the policy-makers of China for synergies and tradeoffs between economic development and PM2.5 pollution control but also the studies on PM2.5 pollution control efficiency in the international context. |
format |
article |
author |
Yu Zhang Xi Chen Yanying Mao Chenyang Shuai Liudan Jiao Ya Wu |
author_facet |
Yu Zhang Xi Chen Yanying Mao Chenyang Shuai Liudan Jiao Ya Wu |
author_sort |
Yu Zhang |
title |
Analysis of resource allocation and PM2.5 pollution control efficiency: Evidence from 112 Chinese cities |
title_short |
Analysis of resource allocation and PM2.5 pollution control efficiency: Evidence from 112 Chinese cities |
title_full |
Analysis of resource allocation and PM2.5 pollution control efficiency: Evidence from 112 Chinese cities |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of resource allocation and PM2.5 pollution control efficiency: Evidence from 112 Chinese cities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of resource allocation and PM2.5 pollution control efficiency: Evidence from 112 Chinese cities |
title_sort |
analysis of resource allocation and pm2.5 pollution control efficiency: evidence from 112 chinese cities |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/3405e29e19f54579a403b1af63aa6e0c |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yuzhang analysisofresourceallocationandpm25pollutioncontrolefficiencyevidencefrom112chinesecities AT xichen analysisofresourceallocationandpm25pollutioncontrolefficiencyevidencefrom112chinesecities AT yanyingmao analysisofresourceallocationandpm25pollutioncontrolefficiencyevidencefrom112chinesecities AT chenyangshuai analysisofresourceallocationandpm25pollutioncontrolefficiencyevidencefrom112chinesecities AT liudanjiao analysisofresourceallocationandpm25pollutioncontrolefficiencyevidencefrom112chinesecities AT yawu analysisofresourceallocationandpm25pollutioncontrolefficiencyevidencefrom112chinesecities |
_version_ |
1718405717699854336 |