THE EVALUATION OF INTERIORITY IN THE IDENTITY OF PUBLIC SPACES

Purpose Public spaces in the context of everyday life in an urban environment include all places with public access and public use. Places for public interaction provide the greatest amount of human contact. In every city, many interiors are considered public because they are of or pertain to the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Sahar Asadollahi Asl Zarkhah, Zeynep Tuna Ultav, Gülnur Ballice
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design 2020
Materias:	Interiority place identity public interior public space Kızlarağası Inn Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/34149eaefaf54ce99c867f5020b50837
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:34149eaefaf54ce99c867f5020b50837
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:34149eaefaf54ce99c867f5020b508372021-11-07T06:21:54ZTHE EVALUATION OF INTERIORITY IN THE IDENTITY OF PUBLIC SPACES10.15320/ICONARP.2020.1272147-9380https://doaj.org/article/34149eaefaf54ce99c867f5020b508372020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/318https://doaj.org/toc/2147-9380 Purpose Public spaces in the context of everyday life in an urban environment include all places with public access and public use. Places for public interaction provide the greatest amount of human contact. In every city, many interiors are considered public because they are of or pertain to the people in everyday life. As part of public spaces, public interiors have an important role in creating place identity. In an urban environment, place identity is defined by meanings as well as the elements of setting, activities, and events taking place within that environment. This paper aims to reveal the interiority attributes and elements of public interiors to determine how they influence the identity of interior places. This understanding clarifies how this differs from the more general concept of place identity in public spaces. Design/Methodology/Approach To do this, a framework for identity was constructed with three components: physical setting, activity, and meaning, based on the main theoretical perspectives of Relph (1976) and Montgomery (1998). To determine the relationships between the interiority indicators of public interiors and identity, this case study focused on Kızlarağası Inn, a historic inn in İzmir, and its immediate surroundings. Data concerning the components of place identity were collected through archival research, observations, on-site documentation, questionnaires, interviews, behavior mapping, and tracking. Findings The analysis of the attributes and elements of place identity in this public interior indicated that the interiority of public spaces can play a positive role in increasing place identity. Moreover, the evaluations revealed the effect of internality in each component of place identity. Features like well-defined boundaries, closeness to human scale, volumetric properties, legibility, the potential of promoting a wide range of activities, and promoting a different sensory context stem from the internality of place. Social/Practical Implications This study emphasized the importance of public and urban interiors as significant places that facilitate public life. Moreover, it showed the extension of interior spaces outside the buildings, which emphasized a new perspective for interior architects and urban designers by bringing a new understanding of the interiority. Sahar Asadollahi Asl ZarkhahZeynep Tuna UltavGülnur BalliceKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and DesignarticleInteriorityplace identitypublic interiorpublic spaceKızlarağası InnArchitectureNA1-9428City planningHT165.5-169.9ENIconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning, Vol 8, Iss 2 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Interiority place identity public interior public space Kızlarağası Inn Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9
spellingShingle	Interiority place identity public interior public space Kızlarağası Inn Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9 Sahar Asadollahi Asl Zarkhah Zeynep Tuna Ultav Gülnur Ballice THE EVALUATION OF INTERIORITY IN THE IDENTITY OF PUBLIC SPACES
description	Purpose Public spaces in the context of everyday life in an urban environment include all places with public access and public use. Places for public interaction provide the greatest amount of human contact. In every city, many interiors are considered public because they are of or pertain to the people in everyday life. As part of public spaces, public interiors have an important role in creating place identity. In an urban environment, place identity is defined by meanings as well as the elements of setting, activities, and events taking place within that environment. This paper aims to reveal the interiority attributes and elements of public interiors to determine how they influence the identity of interior places. This understanding clarifies how this differs from the more general concept of place identity in public spaces. Design/Methodology/Approach To do this, a framework for identity was constructed with three components: physical setting, activity, and meaning, based on the main theoretical perspectives of Relph (1976) and Montgomery (1998). To determine the relationships between the interiority indicators of public interiors and identity, this case study focused on Kızlarağası Inn, a historic inn in İzmir, and its immediate surroundings. Data concerning the components of place identity were collected through archival research, observations, on-site documentation, questionnaires, interviews, behavior mapping, and tracking. Findings The analysis of the attributes and elements of place identity in this public interior indicated that the interiority of public spaces can play a positive role in increasing place identity. Moreover, the evaluations revealed the effect of internality in each component of place identity. Features like well-defined boundaries, closeness to human scale, volumetric properties, legibility, the potential of promoting a wide range of activities, and promoting a different sensory context stem from the internality of place. Social/Practical Implications This study emphasized the importance of public and urban interiors as significant places that facilitate public life. Moreover, it showed the extension of interior spaces outside the buildings, which emphasized a new perspective for interior architects and urban designers by bringing a new understanding of the interiority.
format	article
author	Sahar Asadollahi Asl Zarkhah Zeynep Tuna Ultav Gülnur Ballice
author_facet	Sahar Asadollahi Asl Zarkhah Zeynep Tuna Ultav Gülnur Ballice
author_sort	Sahar Asadollahi Asl Zarkhah
title	THE EVALUATION OF INTERIORITY IN THE IDENTITY OF PUBLIC SPACES
title_short	THE EVALUATION OF INTERIORITY IN THE IDENTITY OF PUBLIC SPACES
title_full	THE EVALUATION OF INTERIORITY IN THE IDENTITY OF PUBLIC SPACES
title_fullStr	THE EVALUATION OF INTERIORITY IN THE IDENTITY OF PUBLIC SPACES
title_full_unstemmed	THE EVALUATION OF INTERIORITY IN THE IDENTITY OF PUBLIC SPACES
title_sort	evaluation of interiority in the identity of public spaces
publisher	Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/34149eaefaf54ce99c867f5020b50837
work_keys_str_mv	AT saharasadollahiaslzarkhah theevaluationofinteriorityintheidentityofpublicspaces AT zeyneptunaultav theevaluationofinteriorityintheidentityofpublicspaces AT gulnurballice theevaluationofinteriorityintheidentityofpublicspaces AT saharasadollahiaslzarkhah evaluationofinteriorityintheidentityofpublicspaces AT zeyneptunaultav evaluationofinteriorityintheidentityofpublicspaces AT gulnurballice evaluationofinteriorityintheidentityofpublicspaces
_version_	1718443602013585408

THE EVALUATION OF INTERIORITY IN THE IDENTITY OF PUBLIC SPACES

Ejemplares similares