Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey
Objectives Low optimism and low numeracy are associated with difficulty or lack of participation in making treatment-related health care decisions. We investigated whether low optimism and low self-reported numeracy scores could help uncover evidence of decisional conflict in a discrete-choice exper...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3446c10d7c424089965b26291eef2a01 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:3446c10d7c424089965b26291eef2a01 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:3446c10d7c424089965b26291eef2a012021-11-15T04:03:27ZExploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey2381-468310.1177/23814683211058663https://doaj.org/article/3446c10d7c424089965b26291eef2a012021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1177/23814683211058663https://doaj.org/toc/2381-4683Objectives Low optimism and low numeracy are associated with difficulty or lack of participation in making treatment-related health care decisions. We investigated whether low optimism and low self-reported numeracy scores could help uncover evidence of decisional conflict in a discrete-choice experiment (DCE). Methods Preferences for a treatment to delay type 1 diabetes were elicited using a DCE among 1501 parents in the United States. Respondents chose between two hypothetical treatments or they could choose no treatment (opt out) in a series of choice questions. The survey included a measure of optimism and a measure of subjective numeracy. We used latent class analyses where membership probability was predicted by optimism and numeracy scores. Results Respondents with lower optimism scores had a higher probability of membership in a class with disordered preferences ( P value for optimism coefficient = 0.032). Those with lower self-reported numeracy scores were more likely to be in a class with a strong preference for opting out and disordered preferences ( P = 0.000) or a class with a preference for opting out and avoiding serious treatment-related risks ( P = 0.015). Conclusions If respondents with lower optimism and numeracy scores are more likely to choose to opt out or have disordered preferences in a DCE, it may indicate that they have difficulty completing choice tasks.Jessie SutphinRachael L. DiSantostefanoColton LeachBrett HauberCarol MansfieldSAGE PublishingarticleMedicine (General)R5-920ENMDM Policy & Practice, Vol 6 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine (General) R5-920 |
spellingShingle |
Medicine (General) R5-920 Jessie Sutphin Rachael L. DiSantostefano Colton Leach Brett Hauber Carol Mansfield Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey |
description |
Objectives Low optimism and low numeracy are associated with difficulty or lack of participation in making treatment-related health care decisions. We investigated whether low optimism and low self-reported numeracy scores could help uncover evidence of decisional conflict in a discrete-choice experiment (DCE). Methods Preferences for a treatment to delay type 1 diabetes were elicited using a DCE among 1501 parents in the United States. Respondents chose between two hypothetical treatments or they could choose no treatment (opt out) in a series of choice questions. The survey included a measure of optimism and a measure of subjective numeracy. We used latent class analyses where membership probability was predicted by optimism and numeracy scores. Results Respondents with lower optimism scores had a higher probability of membership in a class with disordered preferences ( P value for optimism coefficient = 0.032). Those with lower self-reported numeracy scores were more likely to be in a class with a strong preference for opting out and disordered preferences ( P = 0.000) or a class with a preference for opting out and avoiding serious treatment-related risks ( P = 0.015). Conclusions If respondents with lower optimism and numeracy scores are more likely to choose to opt out or have disordered preferences in a DCE, it may indicate that they have difficulty completing choice tasks. |
format |
article |
author |
Jessie Sutphin Rachael L. DiSantostefano Colton Leach Brett Hauber Carol Mansfield |
author_facet |
Jessie Sutphin Rachael L. DiSantostefano Colton Leach Brett Hauber Carol Mansfield |
author_sort |
Jessie Sutphin |
title |
Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey |
title_short |
Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey |
title_full |
Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey |
title_fullStr |
Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey |
title_sort |
exploring decisional conflict with measures of numeracy and optimism in a stated preference survey |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/3446c10d7c424089965b26291eef2a01 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jessiesutphin exploringdecisionalconflictwithmeasuresofnumeracyandoptimisminastatedpreferencesurvey AT rachaelldisantostefano exploringdecisionalconflictwithmeasuresofnumeracyandoptimisminastatedpreferencesurvey AT coltonleach exploringdecisionalconflictwithmeasuresofnumeracyandoptimisminastatedpreferencesurvey AT bretthauber exploringdecisionalconflictwithmeasuresofnumeracyandoptimisminastatedpreferencesurvey AT carolmansfield exploringdecisionalconflictwithmeasuresofnumeracyandoptimisminastatedpreferencesurvey |
_version_ |
1718428858287390720 |