Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey

Objectives Low optimism and low numeracy are associated with difficulty or lack of participation in making treatment-related health care decisions. We investigated whether low optimism and low self-reported numeracy scores could help uncover evidence of decisional conflict in a discrete-choice exper...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jessie Sutphin, Rachael L. DiSantostefano, Colton Leach, Brett Hauber, Carol Mansfield
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SAGE Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3446c10d7c424089965b26291eef2a01
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3446c10d7c424089965b26291eef2a01
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3446c10d7c424089965b26291eef2a012021-11-15T04:03:27ZExploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey2381-468310.1177/23814683211058663https://doaj.org/article/3446c10d7c424089965b26291eef2a012021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1177/23814683211058663https://doaj.org/toc/2381-4683Objectives Low optimism and low numeracy are associated with difficulty or lack of participation in making treatment-related health care decisions. We investigated whether low optimism and low self-reported numeracy scores could help uncover evidence of decisional conflict in a discrete-choice experiment (DCE). Methods Preferences for a treatment to delay type 1 diabetes were elicited using a DCE among 1501 parents in the United States. Respondents chose between two hypothetical treatments or they could choose no treatment (opt out) in a series of choice questions. The survey included a measure of optimism and a measure of subjective numeracy. We used latent class analyses where membership probability was predicted by optimism and numeracy scores. Results Respondents with lower optimism scores had a higher probability of membership in a class with disordered preferences ( P value for optimism coefficient = 0.032). Those with lower self-reported numeracy scores were more likely to be in a class with a strong preference for opting out and disordered preferences ( P = 0.000) or a class with a preference for opting out and avoiding serious treatment-related risks ( P = 0.015). Conclusions If respondents with lower optimism and numeracy scores are more likely to choose to opt out or have disordered preferences in a DCE, it may indicate that they have difficulty completing choice tasks.Jessie SutphinRachael L. DiSantostefanoColton LeachBrett HauberCarol MansfieldSAGE PublishingarticleMedicine (General)R5-920ENMDM Policy & Practice, Vol 6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Medicine (General)
R5-920
Jessie Sutphin
Rachael L. DiSantostefano
Colton Leach
Brett Hauber
Carol Mansfield
Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey
description Objectives Low optimism and low numeracy are associated with difficulty or lack of participation in making treatment-related health care decisions. We investigated whether low optimism and low self-reported numeracy scores could help uncover evidence of decisional conflict in a discrete-choice experiment (DCE). Methods Preferences for a treatment to delay type 1 diabetes were elicited using a DCE among 1501 parents in the United States. Respondents chose between two hypothetical treatments or they could choose no treatment (opt out) in a series of choice questions. The survey included a measure of optimism and a measure of subjective numeracy. We used latent class analyses where membership probability was predicted by optimism and numeracy scores. Results Respondents with lower optimism scores had a higher probability of membership in a class with disordered preferences ( P value for optimism coefficient = 0.032). Those with lower self-reported numeracy scores were more likely to be in a class with a strong preference for opting out and disordered preferences ( P = 0.000) or a class with a preference for opting out and avoiding serious treatment-related risks ( P = 0.015). Conclusions If respondents with lower optimism and numeracy scores are more likely to choose to opt out or have disordered preferences in a DCE, it may indicate that they have difficulty completing choice tasks.
format article
author Jessie Sutphin
Rachael L. DiSantostefano
Colton Leach
Brett Hauber
Carol Mansfield
author_facet Jessie Sutphin
Rachael L. DiSantostefano
Colton Leach
Brett Hauber
Carol Mansfield
author_sort Jessie Sutphin
title Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey
title_short Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey
title_full Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey
title_fullStr Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey
title_sort exploring decisional conflict with measures of numeracy and optimism in a stated preference survey
publisher SAGE Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3446c10d7c424089965b26291eef2a01
work_keys_str_mv AT jessiesutphin exploringdecisionalconflictwithmeasuresofnumeracyandoptimisminastatedpreferencesurvey
AT rachaelldisantostefano exploringdecisionalconflictwithmeasuresofnumeracyandoptimisminastatedpreferencesurvey
AT coltonleach exploringdecisionalconflictwithmeasuresofnumeracyandoptimisminastatedpreferencesurvey
AT bretthauber exploringdecisionalconflictwithmeasuresofnumeracyandoptimisminastatedpreferencesurvey
AT carolmansfield exploringdecisionalconflictwithmeasuresofnumeracyandoptimisminastatedpreferencesurvey
_version_ 1718428858287390720