Management of complex surgical wounds of the back: identifying an evidence-based approach

Background Postoperative dehiscence and surgical site infection after spinal surgery can carry serious morbidity. Multidisciplinary involvement of plastic surgery is essential to minimizing morbidity and achieving definitive closure. However, a standardized approach is lacking. The aim of this study...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elizabeth G. Zolper, Meher A. Saleem, Kevin G. Kim, Mark D. Mishu, Sarah R. Sher, Christopher E. Attinger, Kenneth L. Fan, Karen K. Evans
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/34490c265d45493d9a2b61d88a7b1e4c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:34490c265d45493d9a2b61d88a7b1e4c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:34490c265d45493d9a2b61d88a7b1e4c2021-11-25T06:04:37ZManagement of complex surgical wounds of the back: identifying an evidence-based approach2234-61632234-617110.5999/aps.2020.02061https://doaj.org/article/34490c265d45493d9a2b61d88a7b1e4c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2020-02061.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2234-6163https://doaj.org/toc/2234-6171Background Postoperative dehiscence and surgical site infection after spinal surgery can carry serious morbidity. Multidisciplinary involvement of plastic surgery is essential to minimizing morbidity and achieving definitive closure. However, a standardized approach is lacking. The aim of this study was to identify effective reconstructive interventions for the basis of an evidence-based management protocol. Methods A retrospective review was performed at a single tertiary institution for 45 patients who required 53 reconstruction procedures with plastic surgery for wounds secondary to spinal surgery from 2010 to 2019. Statistical analysis was performed for demographics, comorbidities, and treatment methods. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, including dehiscence, seroma, and infection. The secondary outcome was time to healing. Results The overall complication rate was 32%, with dehiscence occurring in 17%, seroma in 15% and infection in 11% of cases. Median follow-up was 10 months (interquartile range, 4–23). Use of antibiotic beads did not affect rate of infection occurrence after wound closure (P=0.146). Use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) was significant for reduced time to healing (P=0.001). Patients treated without iNPWT healed at median of 67.5 days while the patients who received iNPWT healed in 33 days. Demographics and comorbidities between these two groups were similar. Conclusions This data provides groundwork for an evidence-based approach to soft tissue reconstruction and management of dehiscence after spinal surgery. Timely involvement of plastic surgery in high-risk patients and utilization of evidence-based interventions such as iNPWT are essential for improving outcomes in this population.Elizabeth G. ZolperMeher A. SaleemKevin G. KimMark D. MishuSarah R. SherChristopher E. AttingerKenneth L. FanKaren K. EvansKorean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeonsarticlesurgical wound dehiscencespinal surgerysoft tissue infectionssurgical wound infectionpostoperative careSurgeryRD1-811ENArchives of Plastic Surgery, Vol 48, Iss 6, Pp 599-606 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic surgical wound dehiscence
spinal surgery
soft tissue infections
surgical wound infection
postoperative care
Surgery
RD1-811
spellingShingle surgical wound dehiscence
spinal surgery
soft tissue infections
surgical wound infection
postoperative care
Surgery
RD1-811
Elizabeth G. Zolper
Meher A. Saleem
Kevin G. Kim
Mark D. Mishu
Sarah R. Sher
Christopher E. Attinger
Kenneth L. Fan
Karen K. Evans
Management of complex surgical wounds of the back: identifying an evidence-based approach
description Background Postoperative dehiscence and surgical site infection after spinal surgery can carry serious morbidity. Multidisciplinary involvement of plastic surgery is essential to minimizing morbidity and achieving definitive closure. However, a standardized approach is lacking. The aim of this study was to identify effective reconstructive interventions for the basis of an evidence-based management protocol. Methods A retrospective review was performed at a single tertiary institution for 45 patients who required 53 reconstruction procedures with plastic surgery for wounds secondary to spinal surgery from 2010 to 2019. Statistical analysis was performed for demographics, comorbidities, and treatment methods. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, including dehiscence, seroma, and infection. The secondary outcome was time to healing. Results The overall complication rate was 32%, with dehiscence occurring in 17%, seroma in 15% and infection in 11% of cases. Median follow-up was 10 months (interquartile range, 4–23). Use of antibiotic beads did not affect rate of infection occurrence after wound closure (P=0.146). Use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) was significant for reduced time to healing (P=0.001). Patients treated without iNPWT healed at median of 67.5 days while the patients who received iNPWT healed in 33 days. Demographics and comorbidities between these two groups were similar. Conclusions This data provides groundwork for an evidence-based approach to soft tissue reconstruction and management of dehiscence after spinal surgery. Timely involvement of plastic surgery in high-risk patients and utilization of evidence-based interventions such as iNPWT are essential for improving outcomes in this population.
format article
author Elizabeth G. Zolper
Meher A. Saleem
Kevin G. Kim
Mark D. Mishu
Sarah R. Sher
Christopher E. Attinger
Kenneth L. Fan
Karen K. Evans
author_facet Elizabeth G. Zolper
Meher A. Saleem
Kevin G. Kim
Mark D. Mishu
Sarah R. Sher
Christopher E. Attinger
Kenneth L. Fan
Karen K. Evans
author_sort Elizabeth G. Zolper
title Management of complex surgical wounds of the back: identifying an evidence-based approach
title_short Management of complex surgical wounds of the back: identifying an evidence-based approach
title_full Management of complex surgical wounds of the back: identifying an evidence-based approach
title_fullStr Management of complex surgical wounds of the back: identifying an evidence-based approach
title_full_unstemmed Management of complex surgical wounds of the back: identifying an evidence-based approach
title_sort management of complex surgical wounds of the back: identifying an evidence-based approach
publisher Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/34490c265d45493d9a2b61d88a7b1e4c
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethgzolper managementofcomplexsurgicalwoundsofthebackidentifyinganevidencebasedapproach
AT meherasaleem managementofcomplexsurgicalwoundsofthebackidentifyinganevidencebasedapproach
AT kevingkim managementofcomplexsurgicalwoundsofthebackidentifyinganevidencebasedapproach
AT markdmishu managementofcomplexsurgicalwoundsofthebackidentifyinganevidencebasedapproach
AT sarahrsher managementofcomplexsurgicalwoundsofthebackidentifyinganevidencebasedapproach
AT christophereattinger managementofcomplexsurgicalwoundsofthebackidentifyinganevidencebasedapproach
AT kennethlfan managementofcomplexsurgicalwoundsofthebackidentifyinganevidencebasedapproach
AT karenkevans managementofcomplexsurgicalwoundsofthebackidentifyinganevidencebasedapproach
_version_ 1718414214476857344