Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory

Tubul-Raqui, in the Lafkenche territory of Arauco, southern Chile, is a wetland for conservation scientists and state officials, but a bude for Lafkenche people. Wetland and bude sometimes coincide, but they are also radically divergent. This paper, a collaboration between two scholars and a Lafkenc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manuel Tironi, Denisse Vega, Juan Roa Antileo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/347342fc76f0429d9f72e9b5e57f5da8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:347342fc76f0429d9f72e9b5e57f5da8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:347342fc76f0429d9f72e9b5e57f5da82021-12-01T14:41:00ZBude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory2572-986110.1080/25729861.2021.1984639https://doaj.org/article/347342fc76f0429d9f72e9b5e57f5da82021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.1984639https://doaj.org/toc/2572-9861Tubul-Raqui, in the Lafkenche territory of Arauco, southern Chile, is a wetland for conservation scientists and state officials, but a bude for Lafkenche people. Wetland and bude sometimes coincide, but they are also radically divergent. This paper, a collaboration between two scholars and a Lafkenche longko, is about the existential and political consequences of this disjuncture for Lafkenche life projects and struggles for self-determination. By chronicling two recent events in Tubul-Raqui – the implementation of a sustainable plan for wetland conservation and the 2010 tsunami – we argue that liberal conservation programs under the rubric of “sustainability,” or what we call convivial conservation, only reinforce Indigenous disspossesion and extenuates Lafkenche lives. We show, as well, that the decolonization of conservation entails accounting for the plural meanings, practices, and temporalities of extinction – since death in Tubul-Raqui was not brought by the tsunami but by the extreme latency of extractivism, or what we call extractivist endings. We conclude by reflecting on the political trap faced by Lafkenche communities in Tubul-Raqui – the impossibilty to save the bude without converting it into a wetland – and to what extent this situation demands for a mode of politics that inhabits at the intersection between the plausible and the unconceivable – or what we call an unthinkable politics.Manuel TironiDenisse VegaJuan Roa AntileoTaylor & Francis Grouparticleconservationdecolonizationextinctionindigenous politicschileTechnology (General)T1-995Social sciences (General)H1-99ENTapuya, Vol 0, Iss 0 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic conservation
decolonization
extinction
indigenous politics
chile
Technology (General)
T1-995
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle conservation
decolonization
extinction
indigenous politics
chile
Technology (General)
T1-995
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Manuel Tironi
Denisse Vega
Juan Roa Antileo
Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory
description Tubul-Raqui, in the Lafkenche territory of Arauco, southern Chile, is a wetland for conservation scientists and state officials, but a bude for Lafkenche people. Wetland and bude sometimes coincide, but they are also radically divergent. This paper, a collaboration between two scholars and a Lafkenche longko, is about the existential and political consequences of this disjuncture for Lafkenche life projects and struggles for self-determination. By chronicling two recent events in Tubul-Raqui – the implementation of a sustainable plan for wetland conservation and the 2010 tsunami – we argue that liberal conservation programs under the rubric of “sustainability,” or what we call convivial conservation, only reinforce Indigenous disspossesion and extenuates Lafkenche lives. We show, as well, that the decolonization of conservation entails accounting for the plural meanings, practices, and temporalities of extinction – since death in Tubul-Raqui was not brought by the tsunami but by the extreme latency of extractivism, or what we call extractivist endings. We conclude by reflecting on the political trap faced by Lafkenche communities in Tubul-Raqui – the impossibilty to save the bude without converting it into a wetland – and to what extent this situation demands for a mode of politics that inhabits at the intersection between the plausible and the unconceivable – or what we call an unthinkable politics.
format article
author Manuel Tironi
Denisse Vega
Juan Roa Antileo
author_facet Manuel Tironi
Denisse Vega
Juan Roa Antileo
author_sort Manuel Tironi
title Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory
title_short Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory
title_full Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory
title_fullStr Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory
title_full_unstemmed Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory
title_sort bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in lafkenche territory
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/347342fc76f0429d9f72e9b5e57f5da8
work_keys_str_mv AT manueltironi budeuncommonextractivistendingsandtheunthinkablepoliticsofconservationinlafkencheterritory
AT denissevega budeuncommonextractivistendingsandtheunthinkablepoliticsofconservationinlafkencheterritory
AT juanroaantileo budeuncommonextractivistendingsandtheunthinkablepoliticsofconservationinlafkencheterritory
_version_ 1718404983971381248