Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes

Abstract The 2019 Ridgecrest, California seismic sequence, including an Mw6.4 foreshock and Mw7.1 mainshock, represent the largest regional seismic events within the past 20 years. To obtain accurate coseismic fault-slip distribution, we used precise positioning data of small earthquakes from Januar...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang Gao, HuRong Duan, YongZhi Zhang, JiaYing Chen, HeTing Jian, Rui Wu, WenHao Yin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3487beb941604bbabfdbe2ccedcf7b92
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3487beb941604bbabfdbe2ccedcf7b92
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3487beb941604bbabfdbe2ccedcf7b922021-12-02T15:23:06ZCoseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes10.1038/s41598-021-93521-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/3487beb941604bbabfdbe2ccedcf7b922021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93521-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The 2019 Ridgecrest, California seismic sequence, including an Mw6.4 foreshock and Mw7.1 mainshock, represent the largest regional seismic events within the past 20 years. To obtain accurate coseismic fault-slip distribution, we used precise positioning data of small earthquakes from January 2019 to October 2020 to determine the dip parameters of the eight fault geometry, and used the Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data processed by Xu et al. (Seismol Res Lett 91(4):1979–1985, 2020) at UCSD to constrain inversion of the fault-slip distribution of both earthquakes. The results showed that all faults were sinistral strike-slips with minor dip-slip components, exception for dextral strike-slip fault F2. Fault-slip mainly occurred at depths of 0–12 km, with a maximum slip of 3.0 m. The F1 fault contained two slip peaks located at 2 km of fault S4 and 6 km of fault S5 depth, the latter being located directly above the Mw7.1hypocenter. Two slip peaks with maximum slip of 1.5 m located 8 and 20 km from the SW endpoint of the F2 fault were also identified, and the latter corresponds to the Mw6.4 earthquake. We also analyzed the influence of different inversion parameters on the fault slip distribution, and found that the slip momentum smoothing condition was more suitable for the inversion of the earthquakes slip distribution than the stress-drop smoothing condition.Yang GaoHuRong DuanYongZhi ZhangJiaYing ChenHeTing JianRui WuWenHao YinNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Yang Gao
HuRong Duan
YongZhi Zhang
JiaYing Chen
HeTing Jian
Rui Wu
WenHao Yin
Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes
description Abstract The 2019 Ridgecrest, California seismic sequence, including an Mw6.4 foreshock and Mw7.1 mainshock, represent the largest regional seismic events within the past 20 years. To obtain accurate coseismic fault-slip distribution, we used precise positioning data of small earthquakes from January 2019 to October 2020 to determine the dip parameters of the eight fault geometry, and used the Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data processed by Xu et al. (Seismol Res Lett 91(4):1979–1985, 2020) at UCSD to constrain inversion of the fault-slip distribution of both earthquakes. The results showed that all faults were sinistral strike-slips with minor dip-slip components, exception for dextral strike-slip fault F2. Fault-slip mainly occurred at depths of 0–12 km, with a maximum slip of 3.0 m. The F1 fault contained two slip peaks located at 2 km of fault S4 and 6 km of fault S5 depth, the latter being located directly above the Mw7.1hypocenter. Two slip peaks with maximum slip of 1.5 m located 8 and 20 km from the SW endpoint of the F2 fault were also identified, and the latter corresponds to the Mw6.4 earthquake. We also analyzed the influence of different inversion parameters on the fault slip distribution, and found that the slip momentum smoothing condition was more suitable for the inversion of the earthquakes slip distribution than the stress-drop smoothing condition.
format article
author Yang Gao
HuRong Duan
YongZhi Zhang
JiaYing Chen
HeTing Jian
Rui Wu
WenHao Yin
author_facet Yang Gao
HuRong Duan
YongZhi Zhang
JiaYing Chen
HeTing Jian
Rui Wu
WenHao Yin
author_sort Yang Gao
title Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes
title_short Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes
title_full Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes
title_fullStr Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes
title_full_unstemmed Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes
title_sort coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 ridgecrest mw6.4 and mw7.1 earthquakes
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3487beb941604bbabfdbe2ccedcf7b92
work_keys_str_mv AT yanggao coseismicfaultslipdistributionofthe2019ridgecrestmw64andmw71earthquakes
AT hurongduan coseismicfaultslipdistributionofthe2019ridgecrestmw64andmw71earthquakes
AT yongzhizhang coseismicfaultslipdistributionofthe2019ridgecrestmw64andmw71earthquakes
AT jiayingchen coseismicfaultslipdistributionofthe2019ridgecrestmw64andmw71earthquakes
AT hetingjian coseismicfaultslipdistributionofthe2019ridgecrestmw64andmw71earthquakes
AT ruiwu coseismicfaultslipdistributionofthe2019ridgecrestmw64andmw71earthquakes
AT wenhaoyin coseismicfaultslipdistributionofthe2019ridgecrestmw64andmw71earthquakes
_version_ 1718387316124286976