Sustaining Tribal Fisheries: U.S. Economic Relief Policies during COVID-19

This article reviews the individual spend plans of U.S. states granted a funding allocation under Sec. 12005 of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act to identify consistency with legislative mandates to support Tribal commercial, subsistence, cultural, or ceremonial fisheries...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Kelsey Leonard
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	n/a Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/349c98e79c104c2e8d9bdfb46ba3c689
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:349c98e79c104c2e8d9bdfb46ba3c689
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:349c98e79c104c2e8d9bdfb46ba3c6892021-11-25T19:00:31ZSustaining Tribal Fisheries: U.S. Economic Relief Policies during COVID-1910.3390/su1322123662071-1050https://doaj.org/article/349c98e79c104c2e8d9bdfb46ba3c6892021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12366https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050This article reviews the individual spend plans of U.S. states granted a funding allocation under Sec. 12005 of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act to identify consistency with legislative mandates to support Tribal commercial, subsistence, cultural, or ceremonial fisheries negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilizing critical discourse analysis, this study identifies state discursive practices in supporting Tribal sovereignty in fisheries management for the advancement of Indigenous Ocean justice. State spending plans (<em>n</em> = 22) publicly available and submitted to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration before July 2021 were reviewed. Few of the state spend plans listed impacts to Tribal fisheries due to the pandemic. Only two state plans included Tribal consultation and direct economic relief for commercial, subsistence, cultural, and/or ceremonial losses faced by neighboring Tribes and Tribal citizens. Overall, the protections within the CARES Act for Tribal fisheries were not integrated into state spend plans. The article identifies best practices for state fisheries relief policy content that is affirming of Tribal fishing rights and uses them to help address the ongoing pandemic crisis facing Tribal fisheries. These findings have relevance for future emergency relief programs that are inclusive of Tribal Nations. Honoring Tribal sovereignty and the federal trust responsibility must be the cornerstone of shared sustainable fisheries.Kelsey LeonardMDPI AGarticlen/aEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12366, p 12366 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	n/a Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	n/a Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Kelsey Leonard Sustaining Tribal Fisheries: U.S. Economic Relief Policies during COVID-19
description	This article reviews the individual spend plans of U.S. states granted a funding allocation under Sec. 12005 of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act to identify consistency with legislative mandates to support Tribal commercial, subsistence, cultural, or ceremonial fisheries negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilizing critical discourse analysis, this study identifies state discursive practices in supporting Tribal sovereignty in fisheries management for the advancement of Indigenous Ocean justice. State spending plans (<em>n</em> = 22) publicly available and submitted to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration before July 2021 were reviewed. Few of the state spend plans listed impacts to Tribal fisheries due to the pandemic. Only two state plans included Tribal consultation and direct economic relief for commercial, subsistence, cultural, and/or ceremonial losses faced by neighboring Tribes and Tribal citizens. Overall, the protections within the CARES Act for Tribal fisheries were not integrated into state spend plans. The article identifies best practices for state fisheries relief policy content that is affirming of Tribal fishing rights and uses them to help address the ongoing pandemic crisis facing Tribal fisheries. These findings have relevance for future emergency relief programs that are inclusive of Tribal Nations. Honoring Tribal sovereignty and the federal trust responsibility must be the cornerstone of shared sustainable fisheries.
format	article
author	Kelsey Leonard
author_facet	Kelsey Leonard
author_sort	Kelsey Leonard
title	Sustaining Tribal Fisheries: U.S. Economic Relief Policies during COVID-19
title_short	Sustaining Tribal Fisheries: U.S. Economic Relief Policies during COVID-19
title_full	Sustaining Tribal Fisheries: U.S. Economic Relief Policies during COVID-19
title_fullStr	Sustaining Tribal Fisheries: U.S. Economic Relief Policies during COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed	Sustaining Tribal Fisheries: U.S. Economic Relief Policies during COVID-19
title_sort	sustaining tribal fisheries: u.s. economic relief policies during covid-19
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/349c98e79c104c2e8d9bdfb46ba3c689
work_keys_str_mv	AT kelseyleonard sustainingtribalfisheriesuseconomicreliefpoliciesduringcovid19
_version_	1718410393766854656

Sustaining Tribal Fisheries: U.S. Economic Relief Policies during COVID-19

Ejemplares similares