Effects of Malaise trap spacing on species richness and composition of terrestrial arthropod bulk samples

The Malaise trap is a popular device for assessing diverse terrestrial arthropod communities because it collects large samples with modest effort. A number of factors influence its collection efficiency, placement being one of them. For instance, when designing larger biotic surveys...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dirk Steinke, Thomas WA Braukmann, Laura Manerus, Allan Woodhouse, Vasco Elbrecht
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/34f5173573ae49bc96f2e6079f8e066c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:34f5173573ae49bc96f2e6079f8e066c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:34f5173573ae49bc96f2e6079f8e066c2021-12-02T17:27:28ZEffects of Malaise trap spacing on species richness and composition of terrestrial arthropod bulk samples10.3897/mbmg.5.592012534-9708https://doaj.org/article/34f5173573ae49bc96f2e6079f8e066c2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/59201/download/pdf/https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/59201/download/xml/https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/59201/https://doaj.org/toc/2534-9708 The Malaise trap is a popular device for assessing diverse terrestrial arthropod communities because it collects large samples with modest effort. A number of factors influence its collection efficiency, placement being one of them. For instance, when designing larger biotic surveys using arrays of Malaise traps we need to know the optimal distance between individual traps that maximises observable species richness and community composition. We examined the influence of spacing between Malaise traps by metabarcoding samples from two field experiments at a site in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. For one experiment, we used two trap pairs deployed at weekly increasing distances (3 m increments from 3 to 30 m). The second experiment involved a total of 10 traps set up in a row at 3 m distance intervals for three consecutive weeks. Results show that community similarity of samples decreases over distance between traps. The amount of species shared between trap pairs drops considerably at about 18 m trap-to-trap distance. This change can be observed across all major taxonomic groups and for two different habitat types (grassland and forest). Large numbers of OTUs found only once within samples cause rather large dissimilarity between distance pairs even at close proximity. This could be caused by a large number of transient species from adjacent habitats which arrive at the trap through passive transport, as well as capture of rare taxa, which end up in different traps by chance. Dirk SteinkeThomas WA BraukmannLaura ManerusAllan WoodhouseVasco ElbrechtPensoft PublishersarticleEcologyQH540-549.5ENMetabarcoding and Metagenomics, Vol 5, Iss , Pp 43-50 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Ecology
QH540-549.5
Dirk Steinke
Thomas WA Braukmann
Laura Manerus
Allan Woodhouse
Vasco Elbrecht
Effects of Malaise trap spacing on species richness and composition of terrestrial arthropod bulk samples
description The Malaise trap is a popular device for assessing diverse terrestrial arthropod communities because it collects large samples with modest effort. A number of factors influence its collection efficiency, placement being one of them. For instance, when designing larger biotic surveys using arrays of Malaise traps we need to know the optimal distance between individual traps that maximises observable species richness and community composition. We examined the influence of spacing between Malaise traps by metabarcoding samples from two field experiments at a site in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. For one experiment, we used two trap pairs deployed at weekly increasing distances (3 m increments from 3 to 30 m). The second experiment involved a total of 10 traps set up in a row at 3 m distance intervals for three consecutive weeks. Results show that community similarity of samples decreases over distance between traps. The amount of species shared between trap pairs drops considerably at about 18 m trap-to-trap distance. This change can be observed across all major taxonomic groups and for two different habitat types (grassland and forest). Large numbers of OTUs found only once within samples cause rather large dissimilarity between distance pairs even at close proximity. This could be caused by a large number of transient species from adjacent habitats which arrive at the trap through passive transport, as well as capture of rare taxa, which end up in different traps by chance.
format article
author Dirk Steinke
Thomas WA Braukmann
Laura Manerus
Allan Woodhouse
Vasco Elbrecht
author_facet Dirk Steinke
Thomas WA Braukmann
Laura Manerus
Allan Woodhouse
Vasco Elbrecht
author_sort Dirk Steinke
title Effects of Malaise trap spacing on species richness and composition of terrestrial arthropod bulk samples
title_short Effects of Malaise trap spacing on species richness and composition of terrestrial arthropod bulk samples
title_full Effects of Malaise trap spacing on species richness and composition of terrestrial arthropod bulk samples
title_fullStr Effects of Malaise trap spacing on species richness and composition of terrestrial arthropod bulk samples
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Malaise trap spacing on species richness and composition of terrestrial arthropod bulk samples
title_sort effects of malaise trap spacing on species richness and composition of terrestrial arthropod bulk samples
publisher Pensoft Publishers
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/34f5173573ae49bc96f2e6079f8e066c
work_keys_str_mv AT dirksteinke effectsofmalaisetrapspacingonspeciesrichnessandcompositionofterrestrialarthropodbulksamples
AT thomaswabraukmann effectsofmalaisetrapspacingonspeciesrichnessandcompositionofterrestrialarthropodbulksamples
AT lauramanerus effectsofmalaisetrapspacingonspeciesrichnessandcompositionofterrestrialarthropodbulksamples
AT allanwoodhouse effectsofmalaisetrapspacingonspeciesrichnessandcompositionofterrestrialarthropodbulksamples
AT vascoelbrecht effectsofmalaisetrapspacingonspeciesrichnessandcompositionofterrestrialarthropodbulksamples
_version_ 1718380722761236480