Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia
Stephen P. Neff distinguishes two ‘roads to the creation of a new state by way of secession’: the ‘high road’ – which sees secession and independence as a positive right - and the ‘low road’ – which sees independence as a remedy for a delict committed by the ‘mother state’. Along these lines, Neff d...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Amsterdam Law Forum
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3518d25d3e1a43ffa94e714556dd12e6 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:3518d25d3e1a43ffa94e714556dd12e6 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:3518d25d3e1a43ffa94e714556dd12e62021-12-02T06:19:48ZSome Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia1876-8156https://doaj.org/article/3518d25d3e1a43ffa94e714556dd12e62009-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/article/view/60https://doaj.org/toc/1876-8156Stephen P. Neff distinguishes two ‘roads to the creation of a new state by way of secession’: the ‘high road’ – which sees secession and independence as a positive right - and the ‘low road’ – which sees independence as a remedy for a delict committed by the ‘mother state’. Along these lines, Neff discusses Kosovo, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, while placing them in the broader temporal and political context. Neff draws from this discussion the conclusion that international law supports only the negative route to independence and not the positive one. Stephen NeffAmsterdam Law Forumarticleinternational law, humanitarian intervention, responsibility to protect, independence, human rights law, Kosovo, Russia, Georgia, Putin, R2P, UN, Security Council,LawKENAmsterdam Law Forum, Vol 1, Iss 2, Pp 33-38 (2009) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
international law, humanitarian intervention, responsibility to protect, independence, human rights law, Kosovo, Russia, Georgia, Putin, R2P, UN, Security Council, Law K |
spellingShingle |
international law, humanitarian intervention, responsibility to protect, independence, human rights law, Kosovo, Russia, Georgia, Putin, R2P, UN, Security Council, Law K Stephen Neff Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia |
description |
Stephen P. Neff distinguishes two ‘roads to the creation of a new state by way of secession’: the ‘high road’ – which sees secession and independence as a positive right - and the ‘low road’ – which sees independence as a remedy for a delict committed by the ‘mother state’. Along these lines, Neff discusses Kosovo, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, while placing them in the broader temporal and political context. Neff draws from this discussion the conclusion that international law supports only the negative route to independence and not the positive one. |
format |
article |
author |
Stephen Neff |
author_facet |
Stephen Neff |
author_sort |
Stephen Neff |
title |
Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia |
title_short |
Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia |
title_full |
Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia |
title_fullStr |
Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia |
title_sort |
some considerations on secession and independence: the cases of kosovo and georgia |
publisher |
Amsterdam Law Forum |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/3518d25d3e1a43ffa94e714556dd12e6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stephenneff someconsiderationsonsecessionandindependencethecasesofkosovoandgeorgia |
_version_ |
1718399926697721856 |