Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia

Stephen P. Neff distinguishes two ‘roads to the creation of a new state by way of secession’: the ‘high road’ – which sees secession and independence as a positive right - and the ‘low road’ – which sees independence as a remedy for a delict committed by the ‘mother state’. Along these lines, Neff d...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stephen Neff
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Amsterdam Law Forum 2009
Materias:
Law
K
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3518d25d3e1a43ffa94e714556dd12e6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3518d25d3e1a43ffa94e714556dd12e6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3518d25d3e1a43ffa94e714556dd12e62021-12-02T06:19:48ZSome Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia1876-8156https://doaj.org/article/3518d25d3e1a43ffa94e714556dd12e62009-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/article/view/60https://doaj.org/toc/1876-8156Stephen P. Neff distinguishes two ‘roads to the creation of a new state by way of secession’: the ‘high road’ – which sees secession and independence as a positive right - and the ‘low road’ – which sees independence as a remedy for a delict committed by the ‘mother state’. Along these lines, Neff discusses Kosovo, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, while placing them in the broader temporal and political context. Neff draws from this discussion the conclusion that international law supports only the negative route to independence and not the positive one. Stephen NeffAmsterdam Law Forumarticleinternational law, humanitarian intervention, responsibility to protect, independence, human rights law, Kosovo, Russia, Georgia, Putin, R2P, UN, Security Council,LawKENAmsterdam Law Forum, Vol 1, Iss 2, Pp 33-38 (2009)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic international law, humanitarian intervention, responsibility to protect, independence, human rights law, Kosovo, Russia, Georgia, Putin, R2P, UN, Security Council,
Law
K
spellingShingle international law, humanitarian intervention, responsibility to protect, independence, human rights law, Kosovo, Russia, Georgia, Putin, R2P, UN, Security Council,
Law
K
Stephen Neff
Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia
description Stephen P. Neff distinguishes two ‘roads to the creation of a new state by way of secession’: the ‘high road’ – which sees secession and independence as a positive right - and the ‘low road’ – which sees independence as a remedy for a delict committed by the ‘mother state’. Along these lines, Neff discusses Kosovo, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, while placing them in the broader temporal and political context. Neff draws from this discussion the conclusion that international law supports only the negative route to independence and not the positive one.
format article
author Stephen Neff
author_facet Stephen Neff
author_sort Stephen Neff
title Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia
title_short Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia
title_full Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia
title_fullStr Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia
title_full_unstemmed Some Considerations on Secession and Independence: The Cases of Kosovo and Georgia
title_sort some considerations on secession and independence: the cases of kosovo and georgia
publisher Amsterdam Law Forum
publishDate 2009
url https://doaj.org/article/3518d25d3e1a43ffa94e714556dd12e6
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenneff someconsiderationsonsecessionandindependencethecasesofkosovoandgeorgia
_version_ 1718399926697721856