Globalization

Since the 1960s, the world has witnessed an increasing fragmentation of the production process across national boundaries; the emergence of transnational (as opposed to multinational) corporations; the rise of new social movements; and heightened cross-border flows of capital and labor. As a result...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: John A. Pennell
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/352dafcfdd10402baf66d911dff5096b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:352dafcfdd10402baf66d911dff5096b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:352dafcfdd10402baf66d911dff5096b2021-12-02T19:22:41ZGlobalization10.35632/ajis.v15i3.21582690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/352dafcfdd10402baf66d911dff5096b1998-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/2158https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 Since the 1960s, the world has witnessed an increasing fragmentation of the production process across national boundaries; the emergence of transnational (as opposed to multinational) corporations; the rise of new social movements; and heightened cross-border flows of capital and labor. As a result of these developments, scholars and practitioners have sought to understand what has brought about these changes. Is globalization the culprit, or is it simply a myth? If globalization is a reality, what does it entail and how does it affect the realms of economy, polityy and society? In Paul Hirst and Grahame Thompson’s Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance (1 996); James H. Mittelman’s (Ed.) Globalization: Critical Reflections (1 996); and Malcolm Waters’ Globalization (1 999, the struggle to answer these questions and many others is undertaken.’ This article critiques the major points presented by each author in regard to the questions asked above. Each author’s views on globalization as it relates to the economy, the state, and culture will be examined. Furthermore, this article will show that while all three works have their drawbacks and shortcomings, it is recommended that each book be read to gain an understanding of the wide range of empirical and theoretical perspectives on globalization. The conclusion will offer suggestions on areas requiring more in-depth inquiry. What Is Globalization? While Mittelman, as well as Hirst and Thompson, discuss globalization primarily in terms of economic processes, Waters sees globalization as driven by social or cultural processes. According to him, globalization is a “social process in which the constraints of geography on social and cultural arrangements recede and in which people become increasingly aware that they are receding” (p. 3). Waters contends that in a truly ... John A. PennellInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 15, Iss 3 (1998)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
John A. Pennell
Globalization
description Since the 1960s, the world has witnessed an increasing fragmentation of the production process across national boundaries; the emergence of transnational (as opposed to multinational) corporations; the rise of new social movements; and heightened cross-border flows of capital and labor. As a result of these developments, scholars and practitioners have sought to understand what has brought about these changes. Is globalization the culprit, or is it simply a myth? If globalization is a reality, what does it entail and how does it affect the realms of economy, polityy and society? In Paul Hirst and Grahame Thompson’s Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance (1 996); James H. Mittelman’s (Ed.) Globalization: Critical Reflections (1 996); and Malcolm Waters’ Globalization (1 999, the struggle to answer these questions and many others is undertaken.’ This article critiques the major points presented by each author in regard to the questions asked above. Each author’s views on globalization as it relates to the economy, the state, and culture will be examined. Furthermore, this article will show that while all three works have their drawbacks and shortcomings, it is recommended that each book be read to gain an understanding of the wide range of empirical and theoretical perspectives on globalization. The conclusion will offer suggestions on areas requiring more in-depth inquiry. What Is Globalization? While Mittelman, as well as Hirst and Thompson, discuss globalization primarily in terms of economic processes, Waters sees globalization as driven by social or cultural processes. According to him, globalization is a “social process in which the constraints of geography on social and cultural arrangements recede and in which people become increasingly aware that they are receding” (p. 3). Waters contends that in a truly ...
format article
author John A. Pennell
author_facet John A. Pennell
author_sort John A. Pennell
title Globalization
title_short Globalization
title_full Globalization
title_fullStr Globalization
title_full_unstemmed Globalization
title_sort globalization
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 1998
url https://doaj.org/article/352dafcfdd10402baf66d911dff5096b
work_keys_str_mv AT johnapennell globalization
_version_ 1718376667666186240