Can the design of the instruments used for undersized osteotomies influence the initial stability of implants installed in low-density bone? An in vitro pilot study.

<h4>Objectives</h4>The aims of this study were to compare the initial implant stability obtained using four different osteotomy techniques in low-density synthetic bone, to evaluate the instrument design in comparison to the implant design, and to determinate a possible correlation betwe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Márcio de Carvalho Formiga, Arthur Felipe Gehrke, João Paulo De Bortoli, Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/353142434c674f459082f40cfae0982d
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:353142434c674f459082f40cfae0982d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:353142434c674f459082f40cfae0982d2021-12-02T20:17:12ZCan the design of the instruments used for undersized osteotomies influence the initial stability of implants installed in low-density bone? An in vitro pilot study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257985https://doaj.org/article/353142434c674f459082f40cfae0982d2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257985https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Objectives</h4>The aims of this study were to compare the initial implant stability obtained using four different osteotomy techniques in low-density synthetic bone, to evaluate the instrument design in comparison to the implant design, and to determinate a possible correlation between the insertion torque and initial stability quotient (ISQ).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Four groups were identified in accordance with the osteotomy technique used (n = 10 implants per group): group G1, osteotomy using the recommended drilling sequence; group G2, osteotomy using an undersized compactor drill; group G3, osteotomy using an undersized drill; and group G4, osteotomy using universal osseodensification drills. Two polyurethane blocks were used: block 1, with a medullary portion of 10 pounds per cubic foot (PCF 10) and with a 1 mm cortical portion of PCF 40, and block 2, with a medullary of PCF 15 and with a 2 mm cortical portion of PCF 40. Tapered implants of 4 mm in diameter and 11 mm in length were used. The insertion torque (IT) and ISQ were measured. The dimensions of the final instrument used in each group and the dimensions of the implant were used to calculate the total area of each part, and these data were compared.<h4>Results</h4>Differences between the four groups were found for IT and ISQ values depending on the technique used for the osteotomy in the two synthetic bone models (p < 0.0001). All groups showed lower values of initial stability in block 1 than in block 2.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Undersized osteotomies with instruments designed according to the implant body significantly increased the initial stability values compared to beds prepared with universal drills and using the drilling sequence standardized by the manufacturer.Márcio de Carvalho FormigaArthur Felipe GehrkeJoão Paulo De BortoliSergio Alexandre GehrkePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10, p e0257985 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Márcio de Carvalho Formiga Arthur Felipe Gehrke João Paulo De Bortoli Sergio Alexandre Gehrke Can the design of the instruments used for undersized osteotomies influence the initial stability of implants installed in low-density bone? An in vitro pilot study.
description	<h4>Objectives</h4>The aims of this study were to compare the initial implant stability obtained using four different osteotomy techniques in low-density synthetic bone, to evaluate the instrument design in comparison to the implant design, and to determinate a possible correlation between the insertion torque and initial stability quotient (ISQ).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Four groups were identified in accordance with the osteotomy technique used (n = 10 implants per group): group G1, osteotomy using the recommended drilling sequence; group G2, osteotomy using an undersized compactor drill; group G3, osteotomy using an undersized drill; and group G4, osteotomy using universal osseodensification drills. Two polyurethane blocks were used: block 1, with a medullary portion of 10 pounds per cubic foot (PCF 10) and with a 1 mm cortical portion of PCF 40, and block 2, with a medullary of PCF 15 and with a 2 mm cortical portion of PCF 40. Tapered implants of 4 mm in diameter and 11 mm in length were used. The insertion torque (IT) and ISQ were measured. The dimensions of the final instrument used in each group and the dimensions of the implant were used to calculate the total area of each part, and these data were compared.<h4>Results</h4>Differences between the four groups were found for IT and ISQ values depending on the technique used for the osteotomy in the two synthetic bone models (p < 0.0001). All groups showed lower values of initial stability in block 1 than in block 2.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Undersized osteotomies with instruments designed according to the implant body significantly increased the initial stability values compared to beds prepared with universal drills and using the drilling sequence standardized by the manufacturer.
format	article
author	Márcio de Carvalho Formiga Arthur Felipe Gehrke João Paulo De Bortoli Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
author_facet	Márcio de Carvalho Formiga Arthur Felipe Gehrke João Paulo De Bortoli Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
author_sort	Márcio de Carvalho Formiga
title	Can the design of the instruments used for undersized osteotomies influence the initial stability of implants installed in low-density bone? An in vitro pilot study.
title_short	Can the design of the instruments used for undersized osteotomies influence the initial stability of implants installed in low-density bone? An in vitro pilot study.
title_full	Can the design of the instruments used for undersized osteotomies influence the initial stability of implants installed in low-density bone? An in vitro pilot study.
title_fullStr	Can the design of the instruments used for undersized osteotomies influence the initial stability of implants installed in low-density bone? An in vitro pilot study.
title_full_unstemmed	Can the design of the instruments used for undersized osteotomies influence the initial stability of implants installed in low-density bone? An in vitro pilot study.
title_sort	can the design of the instruments used for undersized osteotomies influence the initial stability of implants installed in low-density bone? an in vitro pilot study.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/353142434c674f459082f40cfae0982d
work_keys_str_mv	AT marciodecarvalhoformiga canthedesignoftheinstrumentsusedforundersizedosteotomiesinfluencetheinitialstabilityofimplantsinstalledinlowdensityboneaninvitropilotstudy AT arthurfelipegehrke canthedesignoftheinstrumentsusedforundersizedosteotomiesinfluencetheinitialstabilityofimplantsinstalledinlowdensityboneaninvitropilotstudy AT joaopaulodebortoli canthedesignoftheinstrumentsusedforundersizedosteotomiesinfluencetheinitialstabilityofimplantsinstalledinlowdensityboneaninvitropilotstudy AT sergioalexandregehrke canthedesignoftheinstrumentsusedforundersizedosteotomiesinfluencetheinitialstabilityofimplantsinstalledinlowdensityboneaninvitropilotstudy
_version_	1718374397339762688

Can the design of the instruments used for undersized osteotomies influence the initial stability of implants installed in low-density bone? An in vitro pilot study.

Ejemplares similares