Validity of the Gender Dysphoria diagnosis and incidence trends in Sweden: a nationwide register study

Abstract The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the Gender Dysphoria (GD) diagnoses in the Swedish National Patient Register (NPR), to discuss different register-based definitions of GD and to investigate incidence trends. We collected data on all individuals with registered GD diagnos...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malin Indremo, Richard White, Thomas Frisell, Sven Cnattingius, Alkistis Skalkidou, Johan Isaksson, Fotios C. Papadopoulos
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/353a3568e4604258a3348f5865caceab
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:353a3568e4604258a3348f5865caceab
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:353a3568e4604258a3348f5865caceab2021-12-02T18:50:51ZValidity of the Gender Dysphoria diagnosis and incidence trends in Sweden: a nationwide register study10.1038/s41598-021-95421-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/353a3568e4604258a3348f5865caceab2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95421-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the Gender Dysphoria (GD) diagnoses in the Swedish National Patient Register (NPR), to discuss different register-based definitions of GD and to investigate incidence trends. We collected data on all individuals with registered GD diagnoses between 2001 and 2016 as well as data on the coverage in the NPR. We regarded gender confirming medical intervention (GCMI) as one proxy for a clinically valid diagnosis and calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) for receiving GCMI for increasing number of registered GD diagnoses. We assessed crude and coverage-adjusted time trends of GD during 2004–2015 with a Poisson regression, using assigned sex and age as interaction terms. The PPV for receiving GCMI was 68% for ≥ 1 and 79% for ≥ 4 GD-diagnoses. The incidence of GD was on average 35% higher with the definition of ≥ 1 compared to the definition of ≥ 4 diagnoses. The incidence of GD, defined as ≥ 4 diagnoses increased significantly during the study period and mostly in the age categories 10–17 and 18–30 years, even after adjusting for register coverage. We concluded that the validity of a single ICD code denoting clinical GD in the Swedish NPR can be questioned. For future research, we propose to carefully weight the advantages and disadvantages of different register-based definitions according to the individual study’s needs, the time periods involved and the age-groups under study.Malin IndremoRichard WhiteThomas FrisellSven CnattingiusAlkistis SkalkidouJohan IsakssonFotios C. PapadopoulosNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Malin Indremo
Richard White
Thomas Frisell
Sven Cnattingius
Alkistis Skalkidou
Johan Isaksson
Fotios C. Papadopoulos
Validity of the Gender Dysphoria diagnosis and incidence trends in Sweden: a nationwide register study
description Abstract The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the Gender Dysphoria (GD) diagnoses in the Swedish National Patient Register (NPR), to discuss different register-based definitions of GD and to investigate incidence trends. We collected data on all individuals with registered GD diagnoses between 2001 and 2016 as well as data on the coverage in the NPR. We regarded gender confirming medical intervention (GCMI) as one proxy for a clinically valid diagnosis and calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) for receiving GCMI for increasing number of registered GD diagnoses. We assessed crude and coverage-adjusted time trends of GD during 2004–2015 with a Poisson regression, using assigned sex and age as interaction terms. The PPV for receiving GCMI was 68% for ≥ 1 and 79% for ≥ 4 GD-diagnoses. The incidence of GD was on average 35% higher with the definition of ≥ 1 compared to the definition of ≥ 4 diagnoses. The incidence of GD, defined as ≥ 4 diagnoses increased significantly during the study period and mostly in the age categories 10–17 and 18–30 years, even after adjusting for register coverage. We concluded that the validity of a single ICD code denoting clinical GD in the Swedish NPR can be questioned. For future research, we propose to carefully weight the advantages and disadvantages of different register-based definitions according to the individual study’s needs, the time periods involved and the age-groups under study.
format article
author Malin Indremo
Richard White
Thomas Frisell
Sven Cnattingius
Alkistis Skalkidou
Johan Isaksson
Fotios C. Papadopoulos
author_facet Malin Indremo
Richard White
Thomas Frisell
Sven Cnattingius
Alkistis Skalkidou
Johan Isaksson
Fotios C. Papadopoulos
author_sort Malin Indremo
title Validity of the Gender Dysphoria diagnosis and incidence trends in Sweden: a nationwide register study
title_short Validity of the Gender Dysphoria diagnosis and incidence trends in Sweden: a nationwide register study
title_full Validity of the Gender Dysphoria diagnosis and incidence trends in Sweden: a nationwide register study
title_fullStr Validity of the Gender Dysphoria diagnosis and incidence trends in Sweden: a nationwide register study
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the Gender Dysphoria diagnosis and incidence trends in Sweden: a nationwide register study
title_sort validity of the gender dysphoria diagnosis and incidence trends in sweden: a nationwide register study
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/353a3568e4604258a3348f5865caceab
work_keys_str_mv AT malinindremo validityofthegenderdysphoriadiagnosisandincidencetrendsinswedenanationwideregisterstudy
AT richardwhite validityofthegenderdysphoriadiagnosisandincidencetrendsinswedenanationwideregisterstudy
AT thomasfrisell validityofthegenderdysphoriadiagnosisandincidencetrendsinswedenanationwideregisterstudy
AT svencnattingius validityofthegenderdysphoriadiagnosisandincidencetrendsinswedenanationwideregisterstudy
AT alkistisskalkidou validityofthegenderdysphoriadiagnosisandincidencetrendsinswedenanationwideregisterstudy
AT johanisaksson validityofthegenderdysphoriadiagnosisandincidencetrendsinswedenanationwideregisterstudy
AT fotioscpapadopoulos validityofthegenderdysphoriadiagnosisandincidencetrendsinswedenanationwideregisterstudy
_version_ 1718377495875551232