Copy number variation in familial Parkinson disease.

Copy number variants (CNVs) are known to cause Mendelian forms of Parkinson disease (PD), most notably in SNCA and PARK2. PARK2 has a recessive mode of inheritance; however, recent evidence demonstrates that a single CNV in PARK2 (but not a single missense mutation) may increase risk for PD. We rece...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nathan Pankratz, Alexandra Dumitriu, Kurt N Hetrick, Mei Sun, Jeanne C Latourelle, Jemma B Wilk, Cheryl Halter, Kimberly F Doheny, James F Gusella, William C Nichols, Richard H Myers, Tatiana Foroud, Anita L DeStefano, PSG-PROGENI and GenePD Investigators, Coordinators and Molecular Genetic Laboratories
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/35b500ab30934e039c31e84cc71c44a4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:35b500ab30934e039c31e84cc71c44a4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:35b500ab30934e039c31e84cc71c44a42021-11-18T06:48:53ZCopy number variation in familial Parkinson disease.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0020988https://doaj.org/article/35b500ab30934e039c31e84cc71c44a42011-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21829596/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Copy number variants (CNVs) are known to cause Mendelian forms of Parkinson disease (PD), most notably in SNCA and PARK2. PARK2 has a recessive mode of inheritance; however, recent evidence demonstrates that a single CNV in PARK2 (but not a single missense mutation) may increase risk for PD. We recently performed a genome-wide association study for PD that excluded individuals known to have either a LRRK2 mutation or two PARK2 mutations. Data from the Illumina370Duo arrays were re-clustered using only white individuals with high quality intensity data, and CNV calls were made using two algorithms, PennCNV and QuantiSNP. After quality assessment, the final sample included 816 cases and 856 controls. Results varied between the two CNV calling algorithms for many regions, including the PARK2 locus (genome-wide p = 0.04 for PennCNV and p = 0.13 for QuantiSNP). However, there was consistent evidence with both algorithms for two novel genes, USP32 and DOCK5 (empirical, genome-wide p-values<0.001). PARK2 CNVs tended to be larger, and all instances that were molecularly tested were validated. In contrast, the CNVs in both novel loci were smaller and failed to replicate using real-time PCR, MLPA, and gel electrophoresis. The DOCK5 variation is more akin to a VNTR than a typical CNV and the association is likely caused by artifact due to DNA source. DNA for all the cases was derived from whole blood, while the DNA for all controls was derived from lymphoblast cell lines. The USP32 locus contains many SNPs with low minor allele frequency leading to a loss of heterozygosity that may have been spuriously interpreted by the CNV calling algorithms as support for a deletion. Thus, only the CNVs within the PARK2 locus could be molecularly validated and associated with PD susceptibility.Nathan PankratzAlexandra DumitriuKurt N HetrickMei SunJeanne C LatourelleJemma B WilkCheryl HalterKimberly F DohenyJames F GusellaWilliam C NicholsRichard H MyersTatiana ForoudAnita L DeStefanoPSG-PROGENI and GenePD Investigators, Coordinators and Molecular Genetic LaboratoriesPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 6, Iss 8, p e20988 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Nathan Pankratz
Alexandra Dumitriu
Kurt N Hetrick
Mei Sun
Jeanne C Latourelle
Jemma B Wilk
Cheryl Halter
Kimberly F Doheny
James F Gusella
William C Nichols
Richard H Myers
Tatiana Foroud
Anita L DeStefano
PSG-PROGENI and GenePD Investigators, Coordinators and Molecular Genetic Laboratories
Copy number variation in familial Parkinson disease.
description Copy number variants (CNVs) are known to cause Mendelian forms of Parkinson disease (PD), most notably in SNCA and PARK2. PARK2 has a recessive mode of inheritance; however, recent evidence demonstrates that a single CNV in PARK2 (but not a single missense mutation) may increase risk for PD. We recently performed a genome-wide association study for PD that excluded individuals known to have either a LRRK2 mutation or two PARK2 mutations. Data from the Illumina370Duo arrays were re-clustered using only white individuals with high quality intensity data, and CNV calls were made using two algorithms, PennCNV and QuantiSNP. After quality assessment, the final sample included 816 cases and 856 controls. Results varied between the two CNV calling algorithms for many regions, including the PARK2 locus (genome-wide p = 0.04 for PennCNV and p = 0.13 for QuantiSNP). However, there was consistent evidence with both algorithms for two novel genes, USP32 and DOCK5 (empirical, genome-wide p-values<0.001). PARK2 CNVs tended to be larger, and all instances that were molecularly tested were validated. In contrast, the CNVs in both novel loci were smaller and failed to replicate using real-time PCR, MLPA, and gel electrophoresis. The DOCK5 variation is more akin to a VNTR than a typical CNV and the association is likely caused by artifact due to DNA source. DNA for all the cases was derived from whole blood, while the DNA for all controls was derived from lymphoblast cell lines. The USP32 locus contains many SNPs with low minor allele frequency leading to a loss of heterozygosity that may have been spuriously interpreted by the CNV calling algorithms as support for a deletion. Thus, only the CNVs within the PARK2 locus could be molecularly validated and associated with PD susceptibility.
format article
author Nathan Pankratz
Alexandra Dumitriu
Kurt N Hetrick
Mei Sun
Jeanne C Latourelle
Jemma B Wilk
Cheryl Halter
Kimberly F Doheny
James F Gusella
William C Nichols
Richard H Myers
Tatiana Foroud
Anita L DeStefano
PSG-PROGENI and GenePD Investigators, Coordinators and Molecular Genetic Laboratories
author_facet Nathan Pankratz
Alexandra Dumitriu
Kurt N Hetrick
Mei Sun
Jeanne C Latourelle
Jemma B Wilk
Cheryl Halter
Kimberly F Doheny
James F Gusella
William C Nichols
Richard H Myers
Tatiana Foroud
Anita L DeStefano
PSG-PROGENI and GenePD Investigators, Coordinators and Molecular Genetic Laboratories
author_sort Nathan Pankratz
title Copy number variation in familial Parkinson disease.
title_short Copy number variation in familial Parkinson disease.
title_full Copy number variation in familial Parkinson disease.
title_fullStr Copy number variation in familial Parkinson disease.
title_full_unstemmed Copy number variation in familial Parkinson disease.
title_sort copy number variation in familial parkinson disease.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/35b500ab30934e039c31e84cc71c44a4
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanpankratz copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT alexandradumitriu copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT kurtnhetrick copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT meisun copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT jeanneclatourelle copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT jemmabwilk copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT cherylhalter copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT kimberlyfdoheny copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT jamesfgusella copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT williamcnichols copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT richardhmyers copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT tatianaforoud copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT anitaldestefano copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
AT psgprogeniandgenepdinvestigatorscoordinatorsandmoleculargeneticlaboratories copynumbervariationinfamilialparkinsondisease
_version_ 1718424343578411008