Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction

Emad Abdelaal Elsawaby, Rania Asem El Essawy, Sameh Hassan Abdelbaky, Yomna Magdy Ismail Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Purpose: Evaluation of efficiency, complications, and advantages of pushed monocanalicular intubation using Masterka® tube...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Elsawaby EA, El Essawy RA, Abdelbaky SH, Ismail YM
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:	epiphora probing intubation monocanalicular nasolacrimal. Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/35e3ee48b30d4ee5ba632c2e1b87ed5b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:35e3ee48b30d4ee5ba632c2e1b87ed5b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:35e3ee48b30d4ee5ba632c2e1b87ed5b2021-12-02T09:03:03ZPushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/35e3ee48b30d4ee5ba632c2e1b87ed5b2016-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/pushed-monocanalicular-intubation-versus-probing-as-a-primary-manageme-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Emad Abdelaal Elsawaby, Rania Asem El Essawy, Sameh Hassan Abdelbaky, Yomna Magdy Ismail Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Purpose: Evaluation of efficiency, complications, and advantages of pushed monocanalicular intubation using Masterka® tube versus simple probing in patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).Patients and methods: This is a case-controlled study that included 60 eyes (of 53 patients); 30 eyes underwent probing and 30 eyes intubation using the Masterka tube as a primary treatment for CNLDO. The children were aged between 6 months and 36 months at the time of surgery, with no previous nasolacrimal surgical procedure, and had one or more of the following clinical signs of nasolacrimal duct obstruction: epiphora, mucous discharge, and/or increased tear lake.Results: We defined success by absence of epiphora, mucous discharge, or increased tear lake 1 month after tube removal. The overall success rate in the probing group was 80%, while it was 83.3% in the intubation group.Conclusion: Pushed monocanalicular intubation is an effective method for treatment of CNLDO; it requires only mask inhalation anesthesia and could be considered as an appropriate alternative procedure with imperceptible complications. Keywords: epiphora, probing, intubation, monocanalicular, nasolacrimalElsawaby EAEl Essawy RAAbdelbaky SHIsmail YMDove Medical Pressarticleepiphoraprobingintubationmonocanalicularnasolacrimal.OphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 10, Pp 1487-1493 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	epiphora probing intubation monocanalicular nasolacrimal. Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	epiphora probing intubation monocanalicular nasolacrimal. Ophthalmology RE1-994 Elsawaby EA El Essawy RA Abdelbaky SH Ismail YM Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction
description	Emad Abdelaal Elsawaby, Rania Asem El Essawy, Sameh Hassan Abdelbaky, Yomna Magdy Ismail Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Purpose: Evaluation of efficiency, complications, and advantages of pushed monocanalicular intubation using Masterka® tube versus simple probing in patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).Patients and methods: This is a case-controlled study that included 60 eyes (of 53 patients); 30 eyes underwent probing and 30 eyes intubation using the Masterka tube as a primary treatment for CNLDO. The children were aged between 6 months and 36 months at the time of surgery, with no previous nasolacrimal surgical procedure, and had one or more of the following clinical signs of nasolacrimal duct obstruction: epiphora, mucous discharge, and/or increased tear lake.Results: We defined success by absence of epiphora, mucous discharge, or increased tear lake 1 month after tube removal. The overall success rate in the probing group was 80%, while it was 83.3% in the intubation group.Conclusion: Pushed monocanalicular intubation is an effective method for treatment of CNLDO; it requires only mask inhalation anesthesia and could be considered as an appropriate alternative procedure with imperceptible complications. Keywords: epiphora, probing, intubation, monocanalicular, nasolacrimal
format	article
author	Elsawaby EA El Essawy RA Abdelbaky SH Ismail YM
author_facet	Elsawaby EA El Essawy RA Abdelbaky SH Ismail YM
author_sort	Elsawaby EA
title	Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction
title_short	Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction
title_full	Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction
title_fullStr	Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction
title_full_unstemmed	Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction
title_sort	pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/35e3ee48b30d4ee5ba632c2e1b87ed5b
work_keys_str_mv	AT elsawabyea pushedmonocanalicularintubationversusprobingasaprimarymanagementforcongenitalnasolacrimalobstruction AT elessawyra pushedmonocanalicularintubationversusprobingasaprimarymanagementforcongenitalnasolacrimalobstruction AT abdelbakysh pushedmonocanalicularintubationversusprobingasaprimarymanagementforcongenitalnasolacrimalobstruction AT ismailym pushedmonocanalicularintubationversusprobingasaprimarymanagementforcongenitalnasolacrimalobstruction
_version_	1718398237089464320

Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction

Ejemplares similares