Neither Philosophy nor Theology: The Origin in Heidegger’s Earliest Thought

“The Origin,” one of Martin Heidegger’s most important notions after 1934, is tightly related to being-historical thinking, and to the peculiar kind of divinity that being-historical thinking indicates. However, the notion of the Origin appears already in Heidegger’s early Freiburg lectures (given b...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Kuravsky Erik
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	De Gruyter 2021
Materias:	origin fundamental ontology truth of being early christianity aristotle luther temporality Religion (General) BL1-50
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/35e7d5e776394c338408f930e15b4486
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:35e7d5e776394c338408f930e15b4486
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:35e7d5e776394c338408f930e15b44862021-12-05T14:11:01ZNeither Philosophy nor Theology: The Origin in Heidegger’s Earliest Thought2300-657910.1515/opth-2020-0159https://doaj.org/article/35e7d5e776394c338408f930e15b44862021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0159https://doaj.org/toc/2300-6579“The Origin,” one of Martin Heidegger’s most important notions after 1934, is tightly related to being-historical thinking, and to the peculiar kind of divinity that being-historical thinking indicates. However, the notion of the Origin appears already in Heidegger’s early Freiburg lectures (given between 1919 and 1923), thus placing it among the fundamentals of his early thought. This article argues that Heidegger’s project of fundamental ontology emerges from that early notion of the Origin, preparing the way for its flourishing in his later thinking. Attending to Heidegger’s early notion of the Origin, I suggest, reveals a unique feature of Heidegger’s thinking; namely, an element of genuine religiosity ungraspable in terms of both philosophy and theology. Thus, rather than interpreting fundamental ontology as a transcendental project encompassing a de-theologized version of early Christianity, it should be taken as an attempt to think the truth of the Origin, thus preparing the way for the genuine religiosity of Heidegger’s later thought. In this light, a unique sense of divinity underlies Heidegger’s lectures between 1919 and 1925; a sense which can only be comprehended through Heidegger’s triple sense schema (enactment–relation–content).Kuravsky ErikDe Gruyterarticleoriginfundamental ontologytruth of beingearly christianityaristotleluthertemporalityReligion (General)BL1-50ENOpen Theology, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 180-207 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	origin fundamental ontology truth of being early christianity aristotle luther temporality Religion (General) BL1-50
spellingShingle	origin fundamental ontology truth of being early christianity aristotle luther temporality Religion (General) BL1-50 Kuravsky Erik Neither Philosophy nor Theology: The Origin in Heidegger’s Earliest Thought
description	“The Origin,” one of Martin Heidegger’s most important notions after 1934, is tightly related to being-historical thinking, and to the peculiar kind of divinity that being-historical thinking indicates. However, the notion of the Origin appears already in Heidegger’s early Freiburg lectures (given between 1919 and 1923), thus placing it among the fundamentals of his early thought. This article argues that Heidegger’s project of fundamental ontology emerges from that early notion of the Origin, preparing the way for its flourishing in his later thinking. Attending to Heidegger’s early notion of the Origin, I suggest, reveals a unique feature of Heidegger’s thinking; namely, an element of genuine religiosity ungraspable in terms of both philosophy and theology. Thus, rather than interpreting fundamental ontology as a transcendental project encompassing a de-theologized version of early Christianity, it should be taken as an attempt to think the truth of the Origin, thus preparing the way for the genuine religiosity of Heidegger’s later thought. In this light, a unique sense of divinity underlies Heidegger’s lectures between 1919 and 1925; a sense which can only be comprehended through Heidegger’s triple sense schema (enactment–relation–content).
format	article
author	Kuravsky Erik
author_facet	Kuravsky Erik
author_sort	Kuravsky Erik
title	Neither Philosophy nor Theology: The Origin in Heidegger’s Earliest Thought
title_short	Neither Philosophy nor Theology: The Origin in Heidegger’s Earliest Thought
title_full	Neither Philosophy nor Theology: The Origin in Heidegger’s Earliest Thought
title_fullStr	Neither Philosophy nor Theology: The Origin in Heidegger’s Earliest Thought
title_full_unstemmed	Neither Philosophy nor Theology: The Origin in Heidegger’s Earliest Thought
title_sort	neither philosophy nor theology: the origin in heidegger’s earliest thought
publisher	De Gruyter
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/35e7d5e776394c338408f930e15b4486
work_keys_str_mv	AT kuravskyerik neitherphilosophynortheologytheorigininheideggersearliestthought
_version_	1718371469199671296

Neither Philosophy nor Theology: The Origin in Heidegger’s Earliest Thought

Ejemplares similares