Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors

Although the recent development and widespread use of image-enhanced endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy have improved endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer, it is somewhat complicated, requires a higher level of expertise, and is still subjective. Photodynamic endoscopic diagnosis (PDED) is based o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hiroki Kurumi, Tsutomu Kanda, Yuichiro Ikebuchi, Akira Yoshida, Koichiro Kawaguchi, Kazuo Yashima, Hajime Isomoto
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	photodynamic diagnosis gastric cancer tumor endoscopy photosensitizer Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/35f95c8bd8104b2c8ebf8fa05209438a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:35f95c8bd8104b2c8ebf8fa05209438a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:35f95c8bd8104b2c8ebf8fa05209438a2021-11-25T17:20:19ZCurrent Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors10.3390/diagnostics111119672075-4418https://doaj.org/article/35f95c8bd8104b2c8ebf8fa05209438a2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/11/1967https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4418Although the recent development and widespread use of image-enhanced endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy have improved endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer, it is somewhat complicated, requires a higher level of expertise, and is still subjective. Photodynamic endoscopic diagnosis (PDED) is based on the fluorescence of photosensitizers that accumulate in tumors, which enables objective evaluation independent of the endoscopist’s experience, and is useful for tumor detection. The objective of this work was to perform a narrative review of PDED for gastric tumors and to introduce our approach to PDED in gastric tumors in our hospital. In our review there have been case reports of PDED for gastric cancer, but its usefulness has not been established because no prospective studies evaluating its usefulness have been performed. In our previous study, 85.7% (42/49) of gastric tumors exhibited fluorescence in PDED. PDED may be useful in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Our previous studies were pilot studies in cancer patients; therefore, future prospective studies are required to verify the usefulness of PDED.Hiroki KurumiTsutomu KandaYuichiro IkebuchiAkira YoshidaKoichiro KawaguchiKazuo YashimaHajime IsomotoMDPI AGarticlephotodynamic diagnosisgastric cancertumorendoscopyphotosensitizerMedicine (General)R5-920ENDiagnostics, Vol 11, Iss 1967, p 1967 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	photodynamic diagnosis gastric cancer tumor endoscopy photosensitizer Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	photodynamic diagnosis gastric cancer tumor endoscopy photosensitizer Medicine (General) R5-920 Hiroki Kurumi Tsutomu Kanda Yuichiro Ikebuchi Akira Yoshida Koichiro Kawaguchi Kazuo Yashima Hajime Isomoto Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors
description	Although the recent development and widespread use of image-enhanced endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy have improved endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer, it is somewhat complicated, requires a higher level of expertise, and is still subjective. Photodynamic endoscopic diagnosis (PDED) is based on the fluorescence of photosensitizers that accumulate in tumors, which enables objective evaluation independent of the endoscopist’s experience, and is useful for tumor detection. The objective of this work was to perform a narrative review of PDED for gastric tumors and to introduce our approach to PDED in gastric tumors in our hospital. In our review there have been case reports of PDED for gastric cancer, but its usefulness has not been established because no prospective studies evaluating its usefulness have been performed. In our previous study, 85.7% (42/49) of gastric tumors exhibited fluorescence in PDED. PDED may be useful in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Our previous studies were pilot studies in cancer patients; therefore, future prospective studies are required to verify the usefulness of PDED.
format	article
author	Hiroki Kurumi Tsutomu Kanda Yuichiro Ikebuchi Akira Yoshida Koichiro Kawaguchi Kazuo Yashima Hajime Isomoto
author_facet	Hiroki Kurumi Tsutomu Kanda Yuichiro Ikebuchi Akira Yoshida Koichiro Kawaguchi Kazuo Yashima Hajime Isomoto
author_sort	Hiroki Kurumi
title	Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors
title_short	Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors
title_full	Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors
title_fullStr	Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors
title_full_unstemmed	Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors
title_sort	current status of photodynamic diagnosis for gastric tumors
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/35f95c8bd8104b2c8ebf8fa05209438a
work_keys_str_mv	AT hirokikurumi currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors AT tsutomukanda currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors AT yuichiroikebuchi currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors AT akirayoshida currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors AT koichirokawaguchi currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors AT kazuoyashima currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors AT hajimeisomoto currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors
_version_	1718412462615691264

Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors

Ejemplares similares