Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration

Abstract Adaptation to delays between actions and sensory feedback is important for efficiently interacting with our environment. Adaptation may rely on predictions of action-feedback pairing (motor-sensory component), or predictions of tactile-proprioceptive sensation from the action and sensory fe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Belkis Ezgi Arikan, Bianca M. van Kemenade, Katja Fiehler, Tilo Kircher, Knut Drewing, Benjamin Straube
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/36368c85669b4a27acad446a94b51427
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:36368c85669b4a27acad446a94b51427
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:36368c85669b4a27acad446a94b514272021-11-21T12:22:47ZDifferent contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration10.1038/s41598-021-02016-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/36368c85669b4a27acad446a94b514272021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02016-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Adaptation to delays between actions and sensory feedback is important for efficiently interacting with our environment. Adaptation may rely on predictions of action-feedback pairing (motor-sensory component), or predictions of tactile-proprioceptive sensation from the action and sensory feedback of the action (inter-sensory component). Reliability of temporal information might differ across sensory feedback modalities (e.g. auditory or visual), which in turn influences adaptation. Here, we investigated the role of motor-sensory and inter-sensory components on sensorimotor temporal recalibration for motor-auditory (button press-tone) and motor-visual (button press-Gabor patch) events. In the adaptation phase of the experiment, action-feedback pairs were presented with systematic temporal delays (0 ms or 150 ms). In the subsequent test phase, audio/visual feedback of the action were presented with variable delays. The participants were then asked whether they detected a delay. To disentangle motor-sensory from inter-sensory component, we varied movements (active button press or passive depression of button) at adaptation and test. Our results suggest that motor-auditory recalibration is mainly driven by the motor-sensory component, whereas motor-visual recalibration is mainly driven by the inter-sensory component. Recalibration transferred from vision to audition, but not from audition to vision. These results indicate that motor-sensory and inter-sensory components contribute to recalibration in a modality-dependent manner.Belkis Ezgi ArikanBianca M. van KemenadeKatja FiehlerTilo KircherKnut DrewingBenjamin StraubeNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Belkis Ezgi Arikan Bianca M. van Kemenade Katja Fiehler Tilo Kircher Knut Drewing Benjamin Straube Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
description	Abstract Adaptation to delays between actions and sensory feedback is important for efficiently interacting with our environment. Adaptation may rely on predictions of action-feedback pairing (motor-sensory component), or predictions of tactile-proprioceptive sensation from the action and sensory feedback of the action (inter-sensory component). Reliability of temporal information might differ across sensory feedback modalities (e.g. auditory or visual), which in turn influences adaptation. Here, we investigated the role of motor-sensory and inter-sensory components on sensorimotor temporal recalibration for motor-auditory (button press-tone) and motor-visual (button press-Gabor patch) events. In the adaptation phase of the experiment, action-feedback pairs were presented with systematic temporal delays (0 ms or 150 ms). In the subsequent test phase, audio/visual feedback of the action were presented with variable delays. The participants were then asked whether they detected a delay. To disentangle motor-sensory from inter-sensory component, we varied movements (active button press or passive depression of button) at adaptation and test. Our results suggest that motor-auditory recalibration is mainly driven by the motor-sensory component, whereas motor-visual recalibration is mainly driven by the inter-sensory component. Recalibration transferred from vision to audition, but not from audition to vision. These results indicate that motor-sensory and inter-sensory components contribute to recalibration in a modality-dependent manner.
format	article
author	Belkis Ezgi Arikan Bianca M. van Kemenade Katja Fiehler Tilo Kircher Knut Drewing Benjamin Straube
author_facet	Belkis Ezgi Arikan Bianca M. van Kemenade Katja Fiehler Tilo Kircher Knut Drewing Benjamin Straube
author_sort	Belkis Ezgi Arikan
title	Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
title_short	Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
title_full	Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
title_fullStr	Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
title_full_unstemmed	Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
title_sort	different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/36368c85669b4a27acad446a94b51427
work_keys_str_mv	AT belkisezgiarikan differentcontributionsofefferentandreafferentfeedbacktosensorimotortemporalrecalibration AT biancamvankemenade differentcontributionsofefferentandreafferentfeedbacktosensorimotortemporalrecalibration AT katjafiehler differentcontributionsofefferentandreafferentfeedbacktosensorimotortemporalrecalibration AT tilokircher differentcontributionsofefferentandreafferentfeedbacktosensorimotortemporalrecalibration AT knutdrewing differentcontributionsofefferentandreafferentfeedbacktosensorimotortemporalrecalibration AT benjaminstraube differentcontributionsofefferentandreafferentfeedbacktosensorimotortemporalrecalibration
_version_	1718419056632004608

Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration

Ejemplares similares